Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:54:51PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> control: retitle -1 unblock: systemd/247.3-5
This look ok. Kibi was already in Cc for the unblock-udeb (the original mail
is quoted below).
Cheers,
Ivo
>
> Am 11.04.21 um 18:48 schrieb Luca Bo
Hi Holger,
On 4/10/21 5:58 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
1. https://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html
It's of course additional work to file the unblock bugreports, but I would
do that, if there are no objections.
I went trough the list and unblocked all the translation updates. Let us
kn
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:18:37PM +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> (Don't know if this is a blocker for the release, but it should at
> least be reviewed before we release IMO, hence the severity)
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 12:53:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 21:33
Hi,
Given that there is still discussion about the impact of merged /usr at this
very late point of the freeze, I think having merged /usr by default for new
installations should be reconsidered.
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:22:08AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've been debating doing this, but con
Control: found -1 3.39
Hi
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 07:19:21PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> version: 3.47
As kibi noted on IRC, this also affects the version in stretch.
Ivo
package: task-kannada-desktop
version: 3.47
severity: serious
Hi,
task-kannada-desktop depends on 'firefox-esr-l10n-kn | firefox-l10n-kn', which
is not installable on mips and mipsel, because the latest firefox doesn't
build there (yet).
Please move this dependency to recommends, as is done with
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> The change (ba4e0289) also makes it more difficult for others to add
> items to the installer tasksel menu for customized builds without a
> technical reason. And any CTTE decision will anyway make
Hi Marga,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:44:42AM +, Marga Manterola wrote:
> I have a machine where I can reproduce this every time (since the partition
> never gets written to), so let me know if you want me to gather any additional
> information.
Thanks for investigating this in detail.
The ch
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:37:52PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Uploaded. Full final debdiff attached.
Unblocked. This needs an unblock-udeb as well. Cc'ing Kibi for that. Full diff
quoted below.
Cheers,
Ivo
> diff -Nru screen-4.5.0/debian/changelog screen-4.5.0/debi
Control: tags -1 stretch-ignore
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Since revision 3.39, tasksel limits the tasks to a predefined list in
> the installer, which ignores the blends task selection currently under
> CTTE discussion in #846002. The result of the discu
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:33:41AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:46:50AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Please unblock package linux
> > >
> > > This includes many important bug fixes, including security fixes, and
> > > new hardware support. It also disable
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 07:55:35PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2015-04-17):
> > # improve firmware support, avoiding loops (#779546); just uploaded,
> > # hopefully builds will be there on time:
> > unblock hw-detect/1.108
> > unblock-udeb hw-detect/1.108
> > urgent hw-de
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> here's a forth round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
> jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
> I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
> (https://lists.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:26:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
> jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
> I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
> (https://lists.
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Added all of these. For kfreebsd, the unblock is still needed.
>
> Please feel free to unblock, it has security fixes only.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note
> that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it.
I unblocked it. Ben, is there a specific reason you didn't include the fix for
#778
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:29:03PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > This probably counts as a d-i ack, but an explicit ack would be nice.
>
> I probably really wanted to get stuff pushed to git first, but now that
> it's done… here's an explicit d-i ack for you.
Added unblock-udeb.
Cheers,
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:11:50AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2015-02-26):
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > No objection on my side, but let's give BSD folks a heads-up since
> > > isc-dhcp-client-udeb depends on bind9's udebs.
> >
> > Thanks, the changes seem to onl
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
I unblocked it, but it needs a d-i ack.
> Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git.
This probably counts as
Hi Steven,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:09:46AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 06/01/15 00:04, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Ivo De Decker (2015-01-06):
> >> First of all: would you be ok with an unblock-udeb for kfreebsd-10?
> >
> > Provided Steven/BSD people a
Hi Kibi,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Also, is anything planned for busybox? Or do you want an NMU with just
> > the CVE fix?
>
> I had a look a while ago, which resulted in the following local patch
> (attached); if you can suggest a suitable version numbe
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:32:11PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Can we please pretend I didn't forget to mention this? ;)
We can try, but I can't promise anything.
> # Doc doc doc!
> unblock installation-guide/20141230
That one was easier :)
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Kibi,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2014-12-29):
> > here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match this
> > time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
> > should go away automatically when ca
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 08:37:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > unblock bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-8
> > unblock-udeb bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-8
>
> No objections.
Added unblock and unblock-udeb.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:35:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > unblock-udeb mdadm/3.3.2-4
>
> No objection, feel free to go ahead.
Added the unblock-udeb.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:01:06AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I unblocked both.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:07:07AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Steve McIntyre (2014-12-08):
> > > > Clearly, this is also d-i material. KiBi has been letting me drive
> > > > this, and I ho
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:08:49PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the
> > debian/rules changes.
>
> It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking
> and bugs it discovered s
Hi,
I unblocked both.
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:07:07AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steve McIntyre (2014-12-08):
> > Clearly, this is also d-i material. KiBi has been letting me drive
> > this, and I hope he's still happy here. I've added d-boot in CC
> > accordingly.
>
> Clearly, he's sti
Hi Kibi,
I added most of those.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> unblock base-installer/1.152
> unblock-udeb base-installer/1.152
Added.
> unblock debootstrap/1.0.66
> unblock-udeb debootstrap/1.0.66
Added.
> # TODO: Check with Colin
> unblock iprutils/2.4.5-
Hi,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:11:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Is there still a reason to keep trying the regular mount? Are there cases
> > where grub-mount is expected to fail? Maybe only trying grub-mount c
unavailable
(otherwise grub-mount will be used instead of the new code).
If dmsetup is not available, os-prober will fall back to the old code. Maybe
this shouldn't happen by default. Also, os-prober could recommend dmsetup, to
make sure it is available most of the time.
Cheers,
Ivo
>From 99
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> os-prober uses 'mount -o ro', or grub-mount from 1.45:
>
> commit 7ed9dec4d2c65056f211324f8e25a4d913b0f2a1
> Author: Colin Watson
> Date: Fri Apr 8 17:39:32 2011 +0100
>
> Use grub-mount if it exists. This lets us do tr
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:02:59PM +0400, Andrey Melnikov wrote:
> In generated config after fresh install - missing initrd= line for kernel
> image. consider use liloconfig form lilo package - it generate proper
> config.
>
> PS: Add in template lba32 by default to avoid lilo warnings on ea
retitle 666750 Please avoid differences between OS-en detected in the installer
and those offered in GRUB
severity 666750 wishlist
tags 666750 - wheezy sid
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 06:37:57PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> retitle 666750 Please avoid differences between OS-en detecte
gt; with admin privileges, i.e. a d-i setup which adds the user to group
> sudo (which is the case for a password-less root-account) should work ootb.
As Michael provided the information to implement this in d-i (which Joey asked
for), this bug should be reassigned to d-i.
Cheers,
Ivo De Decker
35 matches
Mail list logo
