RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release

[ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ] Dear fellow developers, Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds for this platform: - https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/ Debian Linux kernel packages a

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Hello El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió: > Hector Oron (2023-06-07): > > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64 > > (be) and cdrom targets and test that. > > > > Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable with t

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

t point release. Thanks for your support. On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 12:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi, > > Hector Oron Martinez (2023-06-07): > > We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel > > module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor mach

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230526 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: tpear...@raptorcs.com, zu...@debian.org Hello, We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could you please consider the following

dosfstools for EFI partition?

Hi, Hopefully this is the right, or close enough, place ... Given that EFI is common, should dosfstools now be a standard package, so that we can fsck the partition when required? Happy to file as a bug, if I know what to file it against. Cheers, Richard

Bug#1015887: debian-installer: Adding https repo doesn't work without manually installing ca-certificates

On 23/07/22 23:01, Cyril Brulebois wrote: As mentioned by Julien, getting the installer's syslog (compressed, to make sure it reaches the mailing list) would help understand what's going on. Oh - uncompressed, it made it into the BTS, but not to the list. Here's a compressed version. Cheers

Bug#1015887: debian-installer: Adding https repo doesn't work without manually installing ca-certificates

On 23/07/22 18:07, Geert Stappers wrote: Control: severity -1 wishlist Why? Because there's a workaround? Is everyone expected to be able to find that workaround? https is an option provided in the installer, that apparently doesn't work (at least with the netinst installer), and it's not i

Bug#1015887: debian-installer: Adding https repo doesn't work without manually installing ca-certificates

Package: debian-installer Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Using netinst bullseye 11.4 installer: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso I chose to add a network mirror, using https, and the default 'deb.debian.org'. I used (non-graphical)

Re: Installation comment

On 26/07/21 5:42 pm, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:43:18AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the minimal detail - hopefully someone else will understand this much better than I do, and be able to fill in if required. Failing that, I might be able to do better

Installation comment

Hi all, Sorry for the minimal detail - hopefully someone else will understand this much better than I do, and be able to fill in if required. Failing that, I might be able to do better later. Just spent many more hours on this than anticipated, and need sleep. I installed bullseye on my HP P

Re: serial console install issues

On 13/04/21 12:31 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 13:48 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: On 11/04/21 9:26 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Richard Hector, le dim. 11 avril 2021 21:18:49 +1200, a ecrit: > > On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > $ git gre

Re: serial console install issues, all the links of the chain

On 12/04/21 6:18 pm, Geert Stappers wrote: Do we know the "path" that original poster is using? Possible format for answer to this - APU device - 9-pin serial connector - null-modem, cross connects everthing - 9-pin serial connector - USB-Serial-Adapter - Linux computer - XFCE de

Re: serial console install issues

On 11/04/21 10:15 pm, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Geert Stappers, le dim. 11 avril 2021 10:55:28 +0200, a ecrit: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > On how to prevent that more people solve a solved

Re: serial console install issues

On 11/04/21 11:51 am, Richard Hector wrote: Then finally, I can't remember how, I discovered that it didn't like displaying on a 24-line terminal, which most of the terminals I tried default to. With a 25-line terminal, it all seems useable - and Minicom mostly displays it ok too

Re: serial console install issues

On 12/04/21 1:48 pm, Richard Hector wrote: I got the hang of the boot parameters, though that section doesn't mention removing the 'vga=xxx' section from the linux command line. I'm not sure if that's important; I'll have to retest to confirm. I've checked

Re: serial console install issues

On 12/04/21 4:38 am, Lou Poppler wrote: On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 21:18 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: I think so, yes. But my problems started earlier than booting linux, at the SysLinux menu. Perhaps what's needed is more of an appendix for dealing with serial consoles? Anyway, I'll

Re: serial console install issues

On 11/04/21 9:26 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: Richard Hector, le dim. 11 avril 2021 21:18:49 +1200, a ecrit: On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: > $ git grep -i "Boot console" . > en/boot-installer/parameters.xml: Boot console > po/[...] > > That's very

Re: serial console install issues

On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: Geert Stappers, le dim. 11 avril 2021 10:55:28 +0200, a ecrit: On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:51:57AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote: > > > > a serial port and no

serial console install issues

Hi all, I'm commenting here partly because I don't know which bit of software is at fault for each problem ... I have a PCEngines APU4, which has a serial port and no video hardware. I'm using a USB-serial adapter, with a null-modem cable. I'm using a Buster netinst USB stick - 10.1 I think

Re: XFS file system creation fails (https://chuangtzu.ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-testing-amd64-netinst.iso)

On 3/02/21 7:02 am, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi Steve! On 2/2/21 6:53 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: It appears that the latest version of xfsprogs (5.10.0) has just grown a dependency on libinih, and there isn't a udeb version of libinih to meet that dependency. I'll file a bug now. Might

Bug#842626:

On 23/08/20 8:17 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Yes, the bug is still existing: the > installer doesn't warn about installing 32bit on 64bit. But reporting > a new bug report would leave the old one unseen. And it'd then be even > less informative: with the new bug report only we would not remember >

Re: netinst sums and signatures?

On 2/11/19 6:56 PM, Richard Hector wrote: > On 2/11/19 4:04 AM, john doe wrote: >> On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: >>> >>> https://www.debian.org/CD/n

Re: netinst sums and signatures?

On 2/11/19 4:04 AM, john doe wrote: > On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: >> >> https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ >> >> I figured I should verify the checksum and

netinst sums and signatures?

Hi all, I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here: https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ I figured I should verify the checksum and signature, though, and looked at this page: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify That tells me there should be signed checksum files alongside the image

Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

Hello, > Missatge de James Clarke del dia dc., 17 de jul. > 2019 a les 8:25: > > vidcontrol, and the rest of src:freebsd-utils, is available in unreleased, > > since the source package only builds for kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. > > Avoiding this would require either getting the source pac

Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

Hello, Missatge de James Clarke del dia dc., 17 de jul. 2019 a les 8:25: > vidcontrol, and the rest of src:freebsd-utils, is available in unreleased, > since the source package only builds for kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. > Avoiding this would require either getting the source package to bu

Re: Multiple console support

On 19/01/19 5:27 PM, Wookey wrote: > This problem doesn't arise on x86 where there is 'always' a screen (or > some BIOs magic to reflect what would be on the screen to serial). Is that true? I'm sure the Soekris box I've got (in storage) (admittedly, probably not a supported cpu any more) only has

Re: Installer - add BIOS boot partition?

On 12/01/19 3:44 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:31:22PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: >> That worked great, thanks. Though it seems the '1.0MB' free before my >> first partition wasn't big enough (or not aligned right?) so I had to >> st

Re: Installer - add BIOS boot partition?

On 11/01/19 2:31 PM, Richard Hector wrote: > Incidentally, could/should I have made that RAID1? I created bios > partitions on both my disks, and have grub-install-ed to both. The > partitions do seem to be identical. I should clarify - I have 4 partitions on each drive: bios raid: /

Re: Installer - add BIOS boot partition?

On 11/01/19 6:52 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:04:16PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just done most of an installation on a BIOS machine, with a pair of >> new 4TB disks, which require GPT. >> >> Grub fa

Installer - add BIOS boot partition?

Hi all, I've just done most of an installation on a BIOS machine, with a pair of new 4TB disks, which require GPT. Grub fails to install, which I possibly should have predicted - though I thought di might have either coped or warned me. It seems I need a BIOS boot partition, and that it should f

Re: Bug#911241: grub-installer - Remove grub-legacy support

On 18/10/18 3:54 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: grub-installer > Version: 1.157 > > Please remove grub-legacy support. I intend to request removal pretty > soon as it does not longer work. > > Bastian Hi Bastian - do you mean you intend to request removal of grub-legacy from debian? I don

Re: Install on remote KVM?

On 12/08/18 01:37, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 00:25 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 12/08/18 00:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 22:58 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: >>> [...] >>>> I'm mostly familiar with the netin

Re: Install on remote KVM?

On 12/08/18 11:20, Jose R R wrote: > UpCloud provide a similar interface to Virt-Manager when installing > your own OS. They address the issue being discussed here -- by > describing 'a trick' to install your own OS: Thanks Jose - I don't think this method is applicable to my situation/provider, h

Re: Install on remote KVM?

On 12/08/18 00:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 22:58 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: > [...] >> I'm mostly familiar with the netinst image, and it's what I generally >> use to install on real hardware. >> >> I'm less familiar with netb

Re: Install on remote KVM?

On 11/08/18 22:43, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 20:14 +1200, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hi - I hope I'm in the right place; feel free to redirect me. >> >> I want to install on a KVM-based VPS, using an ordinary installer (ie >> not using the i

Install on remote KVM?

Hi - I hope I'm in the right place; feel free to redirect me. I want to install on a KVM-based VPS, using an ordinary installer (ie not using the image provided). I used the provider's method to provide an ISO, and supplied the standard amd64 netinst image - it boots fine, but can't find the 'cdr

Re: Updating the installation guide, arm platform support

Hello, 2014-03-20 19:26 GMT+01:00 Karsten Merker : [...] > This is the commit that has removed the code: > > commit c7c29b3aeb318b9efe3035cacf42800dfe2970f5 > Author: Matt Sealey > Date: Wed Aug 1 12:49:30 2012 -0500 > > ARM: efikamx: remove Genesi Efika MX platform files from the t

Re: Proposed changes to installer for armhf

ply a specific image for it using the armmp kernel: >> > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armhf/daily/netboot/efikamx/ >> > >> > If the docs are correct (which I think they are, git grep efika in the >> > kernel tree shows no DTB support) then it sounds like

Re: armhf d-i switched to armmp only, no armhf daily builds happening? (Was: Re: Uploading linux (3.11.5-1))

Hello, 2013/10/20 Cyril Brulebois : > Ian Campbell (2013-10-19): [...] > I'm not sure about ancina, but at least hasse had disc issues. Not sure > what the status is, but the right contact would usually be $arch@buildd, > added. Thanks for heads-up! I'll have a look during this week. Cheers, --

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

Hello, 2013/6/5 Cyril Brulebois : > Martin Michlmayr (04/06/2013): >> I just received several bug reports about this issue and decided to >> investigate. > Many thanks! +1 > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any > new such items would be spotted early? The follow

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision (patch)

Hello, On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:04:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hector Oron (08/01/2013): > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > > > When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would > > > be nice to output vers

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hello, 2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin : > It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images > for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening > or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is > expected to last longer. ancina has

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision (patch)

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.44 > Severity: wishlist > When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would be nice to > output version-revision information to keep track of which software versio

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.44 Severity: wishlist Hello, On a current debootstrap run: [..] I: Retrieving libacl1 I: Validating libacl1 I: Retrieving adduser I: Validating adduser I: Retrieving apt I: Validating apt [..] When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would b

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

Hi, 2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois : > Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012): >> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your >> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”. >> > What do others think? >> Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hi Ian, 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell : > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:37 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-) >> >> No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1. OK, I think we can go ahead now. :-) r

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hi, 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell : > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 17:25 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-) No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1. >> Unblock request has already been filed. >> Could you poke m

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/12 Martin Michlmayr : > * Ian Campbell [2012-07-10 15:31]: >> Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel >> while installing. > > Looks good. Hector, please apply after beta 1 is done. Ian, could you push your changes adding

Bug#682977: unblock: flash-kernel/3.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package flash-kernel Due to missing detection of the hardware in udeb, later d-i support for Dreamplug was not properly working. The flash-kernel 3.2 version attempts to fix

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/17 Ian Campbell : > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 9edf023..c5f7181 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > +flash-kernel (3.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > + > + * Use get_machine in flash-kernel-installer udeb. Fixe

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/10 Ian Campbell : > Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel > while installing. I believe him ;-) Thanks for the patch, it looks fine to me, but incomplete for d-i. You need to add Dreamplug platform in debian-installer configuration (see installer/b

Re: armhf missing on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

Hello, 2012/5/28 Francesca Ciceri : > It seems to be in webwml/english/template/installer.wml. > This change is needed to add the armhf link in the arch list: > > - devel-images-arches>amd64\narmel\nhppa\nkfreebsd-i386\nkfreebsd-amd64\ni386\nia64\nmips\nmipsel\npowerpc\nsparc\ns390\nsource > + de

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hi, 2012/5/18 Daily build aggregator : > * OLD BUILD:    armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot >                 > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log Apologies guys, but ancina.d.o doing d-i dailies is down. We are trying to contact local admi

Bug#670530: debian-installer-6.0-netboot-armel: missing support for LaCie NASes (Kirkwood)

Hello, On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:00:20PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > Additionally, here is a patch to add LEDs modules for LaCie device to > the network-console installer. Please consider submitting a new bug report for such change once #671200 is clarified. Thanks. Cheers, -- Hecto

Bug#670530: debian-installer-6.0-netboot-armel: missing support for LaCie NASes (Kirkwood)

Cheers, -- Hector Oron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120504151926.ga9...@flaco.tsc-farm.upc.es

Bug#670938: flash-kernel: support is missing for LaCie Kirkwood NASes

Tags: pending kthxbye Hi, 2012/5/3 Martin Michlmayr : > Loďc, can you please review/apply. > * Simon Guinot [2012-04-25 03:42]: >> Package: flash-kernel >> Version: 3.0~rc.4 >> Severity: normal >> Tags: patch >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> uImage et uInitrd files are not generated for LaCie Kirkw

Bug#667681: flash-kernel: Please add support for Dreamplug / Marvell Kirkwood FDT

Hello, 2012/4/9 Martin Michlmayr : > * Ian Campbell [2012-04-06 09:49]: >> Good question. Some DT stuff gets exported in /proc/device-tree. >> >> Aha: >> $ echo $(cat /proc/device-tree/model) >> Globalscale Technologies Dreamplug > In that case, I believe you should modify your flash-kernel pat

Re: armhf installer?

Hello Peter, 2012/2/9 peter green : > E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-3.1.0-1-mx5-di > E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-3.1.0-1-mx5-di' > Are the errors i'm seeing just caused by ongoing kernel transitions in sid > or are they indicative of a bigger problem? That's mo

Re: D-I daily builds failure for armel....

Hello, 2012/2/6 Christian PERRIER : > Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): >> Debian installer build overview >> --- >> >> Failed or old builds: >> >> * OLD BUILD:    armel Jan 31 06:07 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot >>                 >>

Bug#645738: rootskel: FTBFS on multiple architectures

Package: rootskel Version: 1.98 Severity: serious Hello, Your package fails to build from source on Debian autobuilder network: make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-rootskel_1.98-armel-LUOk5D/rootskel-1.98/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-rootskel_1.98-armel-LUOk5D/rootsk

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)

Hello Ben, 2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings : > I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this > week.  This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI > change (I haven't checked yet).  It should fix the FTBFS on some > architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may intr

Re: Bug#640220: linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x: Cannot update kernel image

Hello, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Michael Ott wrote: > Setting up linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x (3.0.0-3) ... > Running depmod. > Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. > run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-1-orion5x > /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-orion5x > update-

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hello, 2011/8/30 Daily build aggregator : > Debian installer build overview > --- > > Failed or old builds: > > * FAILED BUILD: armel Aug 29 06:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk >                 > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_

Bug#572431: busybox: add cross compilation support

Hello Michael, 2011/8/13 Michael Tokarev : > 04.03.2010 10:51, Hector Oron wrote: > Besides, can't we add something like CC=prefix-gcc to the > upstream make arguments (or to conffile), without patching > anything? No need to add upstream changes, on current version I have test

Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)

Hello, 2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama : >> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. >> >> > Sure.  Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you >> > file a bug. Patch applied on version

Re: armel daily builds stopped since June 21st

Hi, 2011/6/27 Hector Oron : > I think a safety check on rsync could be added. > Retrying the build... Fixed... http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/ --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conf

Re: armel daily builds stopped since June 21st

Hi guys, 2011/6/26 Steve McIntyre : > It doesn't look like alain came up, so it might need a hard power > cycle when I'm back in the office tomorrow. It is back on-line now. I manually triggered the build, but sometime we get: INFO: starting rsync Read from remote host ravel: Connection reset b

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hi, 2011/6/27 Daily build aggregator : > * OLD BUILD:    armel Jun 21 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot Some issues with alain.d.o prevented this to be fixed sooner, should be fixed by today. Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would

Bug#631396: flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100

Hello, On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:01:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: flash-kernel > Severity: wishlist Updated version after some IRC comments, for review: From 09e85bde46613216656c1cb9ea0c6eebb530701f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Andres Klode Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011

Re: [PATCH] Remove armeb netboot config

Hi, 2011/6/23 Loïc Minier : > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011, Hector Oron wrote: >> I would appreciate to keep armeb bits, just in case there is some >> unofficial usage or it comes back in the future, which I doubt. >  I don't think there is armeb support AT

Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X

Hi, 2011/6/22 : > 22.06.2011 16:44, Hector Oron wrote: >> 2011/6/15 Kenshi Muto : > It is already included upstream but only for some future version. [..] > Maybe it's a good idea to include it into squeeze-p-u, and it's > definitely nice fix to have for sid.  I

Re: UUID - autmatically entries?

Hi, 2011/5/22 Miguel Figueiredo : > On Sunday 22 May 2011 07:49:57 Rick Thomas wrote: >> On May 21, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: >> > Since like many others you find UUIDs a huge jumbled pile of human >> > meaninglessness, then by all means create labels for all your fixed >> > devices,

Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X

Hello, 2011/6/15 Kenshi Muto : > tags 63 + patch > thanks > > And here is quilt patch for 1.17.1-8. Thanks! Are you able to reproduce on latest busybox (1:1.18.4-2)? Have you tested the patch? Is it suitable to be included upstream? Kind regards, --  Héctor Orón

Re: [PATCH] Remove armeb netboot config

Hi, 2011/6/20 Loïc Minier : > --- > >        Hey > >  It seems this file is a leftover from the armeb removal; ok to remove? I would appreciate to keep armeb bits, just in case there is some unofficial usage or it comes back in the future, which I doubt. Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -..

Re: [PATCH] Add Freescale i.MX serial consoles, /dev/ttymxc*

Hi, 2011/6/20 Loïc Minier : > --- >  src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux > b/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux > index 79dde91..404a4e7 100644 > --- a

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hi, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > add support for the following omap devices to libdebian-install: Applied. Thanks. --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference?    ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hi, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> I was missing libdebian-installer bit. > > I used git send-email. Looks like it does not include a reference to > the git project. I guess I will have to send single patche

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hello, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > This mail is just about adding support for omap to libdebian-install. I was missing libdebian-installer bit. > I will continue with flash-kernel (which calls archdetect in one of >

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hello Sebastian, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > this commit adds support for >  * Nokia N900 >  * Beagleboard >  * Pandaboard > --- >  debian/changelog               |    9 - >  src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c |    4 +++- >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for th

Re: [listmas...@lists.debian.org: Re: Cron sudo -u buildd /home/buildd/di/di-autobuild/buildscript]

Hi, 2011/6/13 Stephen Gran : > Can someone figure out what to do here? That was fixed! Thanks for the heads up! Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference?    ** http://debconf11.debconf.org

Re: debian-installer: kernel lagging for sh4, m68k, alpha

Hello, Sorry for late reply, I have just found this email in my records. Just note that this email call for update, was related to Squeeze release. 2011/5/8 Thorsten Glaser : > The packages are linux-image-2.6.38-2-{amiga,atari,…} > versioned as *_2.6.38-5_m68k.deb (I don’t know which > of these

Bug#626434: flash-kernel: please add u-boot script support

am a bit stuck on how to set ROOTPARTITION on the bootscript, at the moment I have it hardcoded, but hopefully we can find a way around it. >From 93003a5b3affc1a5f3b3abac98d22d077a06f388 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hector Oron Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:15:17 + Subject: [PATCH] fl

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/10 Hector Oron : > 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : >> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it >> there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. > Thanks very much! > Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : > If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it > there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. Thanks very much! Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org, otherwise ping me? Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/9 Christian PERRIER : > By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a > couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in > favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the > required knowledge and access to setup a daily buil

Re: debian-installer: armhf initial work

Hi, 2011/4/20 Jeremiah C. Foster : > It might be nice to get some information and updates about your > progress so people can test and help out if needed. I proceeded and added some changes to relevant packages (see IRC log or check git commits). I added armhf to flash-kernel master, but it need

debian-installer: armhf initial work

Hello, I would like to start merging armhf changes into debian-installer master branch. I wanted to ask if someone feels opposed to that work going into master or have any comment about it. Initial changes are very preeliminar and it might need some fiddling to get it working as it is using d

Bug#620888: flash-kernel: please add armhf support

) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Hector Oron ] * Add Efika Smartbook and Nettop support (Closes: #612376) + * Add armhf support -- Hector Oron Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:13:12 +0100 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 465a495..8264e2d 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hi, 2011/4/4 Clint Adams : > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: >> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot, >> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated >> everytime kernel is installed. > > I

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hello, 2011/4/4 Loïc Minier : >  It would be nice if you could file a bug against linux to get the new >  flavor; I personally would recommend -mx5. That's fine with me. I'll wait for the bug report until we had proper patches for kernel. >  Technically, mx5 would only support mx51 right now, b

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hi Martin, 2011/4/4 Martin Michlmayr : > * Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]: >>   Please comments on: >>   >> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f > > Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch.

Re: Debian ARM architectures and subarchitectures

Hi, (CC debian-boot to see if someone there knows better) 2011/4/4 Arnaud Patard : > Hector Oron writes: >>   I am not sure how current Debian subarchitectures map to. Is it just >> a giving name? Do they map to platform devices in linux kernel? Do >> they map to machine

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

, -- Hector Oron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404115627.GA26134@enorme.TCLDOMAIN.OFFICE

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >  Not sure what you mean; I understand that cross-compiled kernel .debs >  should follow the same interface (/etc/kernel*) as described in the >  kernel packaging handbook.  Maybe the tool you use doesn't generate the >  proper postinsts and needs to be fixed? I mean

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Hector Oron : > 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >>>  1. Chainload boot, at first boot load the usual kernel then call the >>> new one with kexec, if everything is fine then the user can replace >>> old kernel with new kernel, else the kexec call fails and

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >  Ah thanks; sorry that it's not working, do you have the log of running >  flash-kernel/kernel updates etc.? Sorry I do not keep any logs, I'll do next time. >>  1. Chainload boot, at first boot load the usual kernel then call the >> new one with kexec, if everythi

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/9 Loïc Minier : >  I had forgotten the actual flash-kernel call.  I've also added >  a --supported test at the top in this v2. Last night I tested this patch, but maybe I was doing something wrong as it did not seem to work. Then I manually generated uImage and uInitrd and now kernel

Bug#550584: More info

Hi, 2011/3/4 Martin Michlmayr : > 14:59 < bwh> tbm: Are you going to put those hooks back in flash-kernel >  some time soon? > 15:02 < tbm> bwh: I asked joeyh and Sledge for help but nobody suggested >  a solution.  If someone sends a patch, I'd be happy to upload. > 15:06 < bwh> tbm: The solution

Bug#613714: debian-installer: make debian-installer builds available through Debian infrastructure

Hello Otavio, 2011/2/16 Otavio Salvador : > Right but in daily basis? it seems too frequent for me. True, maybe a parallel development daily builder is useful, but the reason I am asking for such feature is to ease the release process and those builds might be useful for other projects such debi

  1   2   >