On 2024-05-24 20:36:41, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
It is a known bug.
This is a highly destructive bug. You have UEFI boot finally working,
you just do some cleanup, and on the next reboot of your server 8
weeks later it doesn't boot anymore. :-(
AFAICT the problem is the config file isn't prop
Hi folks,
if I migrate a bookworm installation from grub-pc to grub-uefi,
then grub-pc.postrm removes /etc/default/grub on the final purge.
AFAICT /etc/default/grub is still processed for UEFI, so why
is it deleted?
Regards
Harri
I am not sure, but isn't systemd supposed to figure this out on the
next run anyway?
Regards
Harri
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.76
os-prober writes a lot of hard-to-get-rid-of debug messages into
/var/log/messages. 2 problems:
- The syslog lines lack a common pattern, e.g. "os-prober". Instead
they log entries for 40grub2, 83haiku, 10qnx, macosx-prober,
20microsoft, etc. This is extremely
Sorry, but this is not reasonable. If I violated some syntax,
then it could tell me. Please note that the postinst script
created a new file with the same bad syntax (2 XKBOPTIONS lines).
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.163
If I append
XKBOPTIONS="caps:none"
to /etc/default/keyboard, and run "dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration"
later, then there is a dialog
The current keyboard options in the config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.163
Severity: wishlist
To optionally replace caps lock by a return key would you mind
to add "caps:return" to the list of supported keyboard options?
I am using
remove Lock = Caps_Lock
ke
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.67
Severity: wishlist
I cannot exclude an essential package on the debootstrap
command line, e.g.
debootstrap --exclude=dash jessie /mnt
doesn't work as expected. It would be nice to have a
"do-as-I-say" option to exclude essential packages.
Please no
If would be nice if you could upload a patched version to experimental.
Thanx in advance. Keep on your good work
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20130613
Trying the Stable debian-installer on a Haswell PC
(Intel DH87MC) I got no network connection. d-i said:
No ethernet card detected
Manually choosing the e1000 or e1000e did not help.
Since Testing/Unstable is not an option in this case,
this i
Any news about this?
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51e2640c.5020...@afaics.de
Since the clone has been resolved, I wonder if this bug has to be kept open.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51e23441.2050...@t-online.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.57
Running os-prober (or update-grub) I get a few messages "Device
or resource busy". Sample session:
# os-prober
No volume groups found
grub-probe: error: no such disk.
/dev/md0p1:Debian GNU/Linux (wheezy/sid):Debian:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
kvm -m 2048 -drive file=/export/storage/usba.img,if=virtio -drive
file=/var/tmp/debian-wheezy-DI-b2-amd64-netinst.iso,if=virtio,media=cdrom,boot=on
-net nic,model=virtio -net tap -vnc :1 -usbdevice table
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why should the maintainer for a hardware dependent package
care for systems _not_ providing the hardware (or different
hardware)? This would be unreasonable.
It would be much easier if I could simply ignore these
packages. But I cannot, since tasksel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.09
Severity: wishlist
It would be very nice to have support for installing virtual
desktop systems based upon lxc.
The idea is to setup thin clients on the users' desktops
(Windows or Linux) and a pool of powerful lxc serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/12 17:05, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> I added a check for autoexec.bat || config.sys , just to have an added check
> and avoid the worse of the false positives. My gut feeling is that either a)
> nobody cares if their DOS is not detected, or b) if
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.49
os-prober finds some MSDOS partition on my laptop:
# os-prober
/dev/sda2:MS-DOS 5.x/6.x/Win3.1:MS-DOS:chain
# blkid | sort
/dev/sda1: UUID="063e2d53-7007-4112-822f-edcba00d2928" TYPE="ext4" LABEL="root"
/dev/sda2: LABEL="debian" UUID="af0b76b9-e91e-4bbd-a64c-b1a6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.49
os-prober fails to recognize a Debian root disk (sda2). Instead it
sees a MSDOS disk and tells grub to use a chain loader, but of
course this doesn't work, since there is no mbr installed on this
partition.
# os-probe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Don,
On 09/02/11 18:49, Don Wright wrote:
> Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Recently I had the chance to install openSUSE 10.3 (2007) in a virtual
>> machine. Instead of many dedicated menus in a chain Suse presents one big
>> scre
Hi folks,
Recently I had the chance to install openSUSE 10.3 (2007) in a virtual
machine. Instead of many dedicated menus in a chain Suse presents one
big screen giving an overview over the most important installation
options and their current settings (e.g. location, partitioning, which
packa
On 07/22/11 01:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Err, it looks plain wrong to me to configure the keyboard on the server
> side.
This bug report is not about configuring the keyboard-configuration
package on a remote machine, but on the client, i.e. the host with
the keyboard attached.
> If I want
On 07/08/11 10:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Xephyr is not X, and uses us by default. AFAICT you need to run
> setxkbmap yourself, so there's no bug in keyboard-configuration.
> Closing this bug report accordingly.
>
Sorry to say, but this is not reasonable. setxkbmap wouldn't
work if Xephyr wo
The Linux Vserver server in the computer room is running
Squeeze with kernel 2.6.32-5-vserver-amd64. It provides
5 identical versers.
The vservers are running squeeze. Using xdmcp and kdm
they are supposed to provide virtual desktops to one or
more users each.
The clients (e.g. my desktop PC) is
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.68+squeeze2
If I try to define a German keyboard layout for a vserver,
then this setting is ignored. I still get qwerty for the
XWindow session running on the vserver, even though all
real or virtual hosts involved have been configured for a
German layou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/11 10:58, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> I am not sure this is a special case. Yes, it makes no sense to
> manually install keyboard-configuration on a headless machine but there
> can be some other reasons that cause keyboard-configuration to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/11 20:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:24:07PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> > Trying to configure several servers over network I noticed that
>> > "dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-config
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.68+squeeze2
Trying to configure several servers over network I noticed that
"dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration" silently dies,
if no keyboard is attached to the PC. Thats pretty painful,
because the servers are supposed to be connected to a KVM only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
On 04/14/11 07:50, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> What parted.udeb did you load?
>
The parted.udeb chosen by the installer on
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
sorry to say, but did you check when this report was opened? The
log files are _way_ gone. The machine I not available
for a reinstallation.
Anyway, I had hoped that this problem would be fixed for Squeeze,
since this probl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta2-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2011/01/07
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please
On 08/10/10 09:13, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Can you provide the output from "/usr/share/bug/discover-data 3>&1"
> run as root on the machine to give info on the hardware and drivers
> involved.
>
See attachment. Hope this helps.
Regards
Harri
discover-data.log.gz
Description: applicati
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: boot cd, squeeze alpha 1
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2010/08/10
Machine: Samsung P460 model AA03DE
Processor: Intel Core2 Duo P7350
Memory: 4 GByte
Partitions:
O
Both command.com and kernel.sys are there:
# ls -al /mnt/
total 1183
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 .
drwxr-xr-x 36 root root 896 May 13 15:50 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 66945 Aug 29 2006 COMMAND.COM
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root2048 Mar 12 19:28 D510MO
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.38
Seems that os-prober fails to recognize bootable DOS
partitions. Sample session:
# os-prober
No volume groups found
/dev/sda2:openSUSE 11.0 (i586):SuSE:linux
/dev/sdb3:Debian GNU/Linux (squeeze/sid):Debian:linux
/dev/sdc2:Debian GNU/Linux (squeeze/sid):Debian1:
PS: I missed to mention the virt-install command line. Here it is:
virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n squeeze_x -r 1024
--os-variant=debiansqueeze -v -c
/export/storage/isos/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso --disk
path=/export/storage/squeeze_x.img,size=32 --vnc
Regards
Harri
--
To
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst iso booted via virt-install
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 20091206
Machine: kvm
Processor: Qemu Virtual CPU version 0.11.0
Memory: 1024 MByte
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst iso booted via virt-install
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 20091205
Machine: kvm
Processor: Qemu Virtual CPU version 0.11.0
Memory: 1024 MByte
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi folks,
Everytime I install Debain on a PC I have to enter aptitude to mark
all libraries and almost all other packages as automatically installed.
If I don't, then they are kept forever, even if dependencies change.
This was surely not the idea of
Hi folks,
Everytime I install Debain on a PC I have to enter aptitude to mark
_many_ packages as automatically installed. If I don't, then they
are kept forever, even if dependencies change.
This was surely not the idea of handling package dependencies. Do you
think it would be possible that d-i
Using a sata cd drive the installation succeeded. There was no network
problem, either.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst image of Oct.2nd,2008
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Oct 2nd, 2008
Machine: custom PC with Asus P5K SE/EPU mainboard
Processor: Intel E8500 (cor
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.8
Running
debootstrap --verbose --arch i386 sid /tmp/mychroot
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
it failed with
:
:
I: Configuring gnupg...
I: Configuring debian-archive-keyring...
I: Configuring apt...
I: Configuring apt-utils...
I: Configuring sysklogd...
I: C
?
Regards
Harri
===
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
On Thursday 20 December 2007 00:13, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I've got a Linutop PC, but maintaining the usual squashfs
system on a tiny USB stick is much too painful. I would
like to mak
Hi folks,
I've got a Linutop PC, but maintaining the usual squashfs
system on a tiny USB stick is much too painful. I would
like to make the USB stick obsolete, and use a USB harddisk
instead.
Question:
Is d-i supposed to support installing and running Debian
on a USB harddisk drive without any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
|
| What proof do you have that hotplug will discover all the same hardware as
| discover1, and load the same modules for it? If it doesn't, the
| installed system may not work.
|
hotplug uses the information in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
|
| I thought EFI was only an ia64 thing. Strange. Could you send a tarball
| of /var/log/debian-installer/ from the installed system so I can try to
| see why it was doing EFI stuff?
|
Sure. This is pretty huge (>1MB), so I send it jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: svn #23974
uname -a: 2.6.9-1 amd64 k8
Date: 11/24/2004
Method: converted monolithic iso image into an USB image,
boot via "expert", network install, no proxy
Machine: Shuttle SN85G4V2
Processor: am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giorgio Raccanelli wrote:
| Hello,
|
| Could you help me to understand what's going on?
|
| Thank you very much
| Giorgio Raccanelli
|
|
I haven't used dselect for a cdrom-based installation
for years, but AFAIR you should press A and select
"cdrom" fir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
|
| I re-did the Installer with 'expert' instead of 'expert26' and the
| 2.4.27 kernel just boots fine. So I have a working system to repair
| things from the inside when necessary...
|
| I read this at
| http://wiki.debian.ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Williams wrote:
| Hello,
|My name is John Williams. I have obtained a CD rom set of
| installation disks for the Woody version of Debian and have had an error
| in the base installation. The error message is that file
| /instmnt/pool/main/m/m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Patrick,
Would you mind to check http://bugs.debian.org/266239 ?
Does this sound familiar ;-)?
For 2.4.27 I would suggest to use sym53c8xx_2, if possible.
This seems to be the most recent driver. And it is not
renamed by initrd-tools.
Good luck
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
|
| Yeah, this is why the lspci output is important so that the bug may be
| assigned to discover-data...
|
|
| So, what we need you to do is report a bug against the discover-data
| package with "lspci -n" and "lspci -v" output
Ali ASLANDAS wrote:
hi,
i made a custom initrd for debian installation cd, but after cd boot,
mounted file systems is not as i expected.
and df out look like this
rootfs 102400 9432 92968 9% /
tmpfs 102400 9432 92968 9% /
i cannot find a way to get rid of rootfs, it must not
Hi folks,
When I tried to update my local copy of d-i, I got an
error message saying
% svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk d-i
:
svn: Berkeley DB error while checkpointing after Berkeley DB transaction for
filesystem /svn/d-i/db:
No space left on device
After that all further checkouts returned
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Please check http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263169
Welcome to the family.
Ooops, sorry, I klicked on the [Reply] button in the
wrong EMail window.
Sorry for the confusion.
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Please check http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263169
Welcome to the family.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
This is not about initrd. The IDE drivers are not loaded from the
initrd in this case, because my root disk is managed by sata_sil.
Sorry, probably my report wasn't precise about this.
Surely the initrd must load the appropriate ide drivers for your syst
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
- hdparm was not installed. (If you install some non-standard
tools like pppoe, then you should install hdparm, too. I
would guess there are more users with an IDE disk than with
a PPPoE connection.)
Hdparm is not necessary if the kernel detects your ide
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
Seems that anna depends upon libdebconfclient0-dev (>= 0.46), which
is not in d-i/installer/debian/control .
Ooops, my error. Of course its a build-time dependency.
Sorry
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
Hi folks,
Seems that anna depends upon libdebconfclient0-dev (>= 0.46), which
is not in d-i/installer/debian/control .
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can understand that managing all the different locales
is pretty complex. But if I skip the menu for selecting
LANG, then the system should still work. And it did,
except for the cryptic country names in select-mirror.
Maybe its too late to change now. But I would guess that
the cryptic country n
Frans Pop wrote:
Harald: AFAIK it is not possible to select C in the installer; you can
of course edit /etc/environment after the installation.
Of course I can manually configure my system, but what do
I need all the choose-something and select-something menus
in d-i for?
LANG=C is the def
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SVN revision 21448
uname -a: 2.6.8-3-amd64
Date: 20040912
Method: grabbed SVN image, built monolithic for
amd64(gcc-3.4), wrote it on a USB stick,
boot using 'expert'
packages grabbed from http://debian-amd64.alioth.deb
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SVN revision 21410
uname -a: 2.6.8-3-amd64
Date: 20040911
Method: grabbed SVN image, built monolithic for
amd64(gcc-3.4), wrote it on a USB stick,
boot using 'expert'
packages grabbed from http://debian-amd64.alioth.deb
Torsten Sadowski wrote:
And if so what is the best replacment for inclusion in /etc/modules.
If not which config option do I need?
Torsten
Yes, ide-detect, ide-mod, ide-probe-mod and maybe some other
modules are gone for kernel 2.6.x.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261780
contain
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SVN revision 21208
uname -a: 2.6.8-3-amd64
Date: 20040907
Method: grabbed SVN image, built monolithic for
amd64(gcc-3.4), wrote it on a USB stick,
boot using 'expert'
packages grabbed from http://debian-amd64.alioth.deb
Hi folks,
Are there problems with svn.debian.org? When I try to do
an anon. co of d-i then it gets stuck :-(.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
Apparently it only lets you change the label is the partition is marked
to be formatted. Probably because the tools in the installer are only able
to do so at format time. If you choose to keep the data on the parition,
it won't let you change the label.
mkreiserfs is pretty fast,
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 02:26:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
It seems that active_partitions/reiserfs/choices still uses
partman-reiserfs/text/options, which was removed earlier. So the script
bombs out before it can give a mount point choice.
I commited the fix.
Using the new
If I select ext3 instead of reiserfs, then I can set the
mount point as expected.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem seems to be fixed in partman_54.
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SVN revision 20757
uname -a: 2.6.8-3-amd64
Date: 20040904
Method: grabbed SVN image, built monolithic for
amd64(gcc-3.4), wrote it on a USB stick,
boot using 'expert vga=0x318'
packages grabbed from http://debian-amd64.
It would help alot if you include the output of lspci and lspci -n
in this bug report, as well as the kernel version (reported by uname -a)
and your boot method.
Could you reproduce the problem using the most recent debian
installer image? See
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i38
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SVN revision 20628
uname -a: 2.6.8-3-amd64
Date: 20040902
Method: grabbed SVN image, built monolithic for
amd64(gcc-3.4), wrote it on a USB stick,
boot using 'expert vga=0x318'
packages grabbed from http://debian-amd64.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Built monolithic_2.6 for amd64 (gcc-3.4)
using svn revision #19897
uname -a: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-amd64-generic-di_0.13_amd64.udeb
(yes, I know its not the output of uname -a)
Date: Aug 25 13:42:35
Method: boot via USB stick, e
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Whats behind the story about libc-udeb vs libc6? Several udebs depend
upon libc6, even though this package is not included in d-i
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Whats behind the story about libc-udeb vs libc6? Several udebs depend
upon libc6, even though this package is not included in d-i, e.g.
busybox-cvs-udeb, dash-udeb, etc. Other tools depend on libc-udeb as
expected
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Whats behind the story about libc-udeb vs libc6? Several udebs depend
upon libc6, even though this package is not included in d-i, e.g.
busybox-cvs-udeb, dash-udeb, etc. Other tools depend on libc-udeb as
expected
VSJ wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I've installed Debian using Debian Installer RC1 ISO
after installation, the /etc/hosts file starts with the following line:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
where is the computer name given during install after the
DHCP/network config dialog.
I'd like to know
Hi folks,
svn.debian.org gives me an ECONNREFUSED when I try to grab d-i.
Would you mind to check?
Many thanx
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Whats behind the story about libc-udeb vs libc6? Several
udebs depend upon libc6, even though this package is not
included in d-i, e.g. busybox-cvs-udeb, dash-udeb,
etc. Other tools depend on libc-udeb as expected (e.g.
nano-udeb).
???
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: grabbed from SVN, revision 19009, AFAIK
uname -a: 2.6.7-5-amd64-k8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.1 (Debian
3.4.1-4.0.0.1.amd64)) #1 Sat Jul 31 14:03:13 CEST 2004
Date: 20040813
Method: build monolithic image for 2.6, boot using 'expert
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
trying to make build_hd-media_2.6 using revision 18997
I got billions of broken dependencies:
You need to satisfy the build-dependencies of the debian-installer
package before building images.
Sorry, stupid mistake. Somehow some "obsolete" packages
Hi folks,
trying to make build_hd-media_2.6 using revision 18997
I got billions of broken dependencies:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
cdebconf-udeb: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.29)
Depends: libtextwrap1 but it is not installable
di-utils-shell: Depends
Hi folks,
When I tried to access https://alioth.debian.org/projects/d-i/
I got a certification failure saying
Website Certified by an Unknown Authority
???
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This problem has gone away, so I would suggest to close the
bug report.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040729,
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
uname -a: 2.6.7-5-amd64-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian
1:3.3.4-3)) #1 Thu Jul 15 02:11:18 CEST 2004
Date: 20040730
Method: conver
Hi folks,
I tried to rebuild a kernel without OSS support. But this
new kernel dies with
pivot_root: No such file or directory
/sbin/init: 424: cannot open dev/console: no such file
at boot time. Google shows that this problem occured several
times with different 2.6.x kernels, but only for D
Package: ddetect
Version: 1.00
Hi folks,
hw-detect.sh lists some modules for kernel 2.6, that
don't even exist. I know of
ide-mod
ide-probe-mod
ide-detect
but maybe there are others.
At installation time this produces an error message about
some modules that could not be fou
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
[snip]
@@ -251,13 +253,27 @@
# XXX: This isn't the best way to do this; we should autodetect.
# The order of these modules are important.
get_manual_hw_info() {
+ case $KERNEL_VERSION in
+ 2.4.*)
+ KERNEL_IS_2
Hi folks,
Attached you can find a small patch for hw-detect.sh
to avoid some error messages about kernel modules
that are not available for newer kernels.
Regards
Harri
--- debian-installer/packages/ddetect/hw-detect.sh 2004-07-26 21:58:18.272069317 +0200
+++ debian-installer.new/packages/ddetect/h
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
Wouldn't it be reasonable to introduce a new bus 'sata'
to discover?
IMO no. What should it be good for? I don't know of any device hanging
on an SATA bus needing some special k
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I would suggest this patch:
--- hw-detect~ 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ hw-detect 2004-07-23 20:46:40.657067301 +0200
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
sparc/*) sbus=",sbus" ;;
esac
discover --format="%m:%V %M\n
Hi folks,
Here is a patch for hw-detect making the sata_sil
appear in d-i's list of modules:
# diff -u hw-detect~ hw-detect
--- hw-detect~ 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ hw-detect 2004-07-24 06:58:56.628433993 +0200
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
sparc/*) sbus=",sbus" ;;
I would suggest this patch:
--- hw-detect~ 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ hw-detect 2004-07-23 20:46:40.657067301 +0200
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
sparc/*) sbus=",sbus" ;;
esac
discover --format="%m:%V %M\n" --disable-all \
-
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
reassigning this bug report to discover-data won't help. I
have mounted the initrd and verified that sata_sil is a
lready in discover-data.
For your pci id? Reported by discover when it's run?
Yes.
To be sure I have rebooted my PC some minutes ago,
Joey,
reassigning this bug report to discover-data won't help. I
have mounted the initrd and verified that sata_sil is a
lready in discover-data.
There is a problem with d-i that prevents sata_sil from
being loaded at installation time.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
>
> Can you provide the output of lspci -n please ?
>
Sure:
:00:00.0 0600: 10de:00d1 (rev a4)
:00:01.0 0601: 10de:00d0 (rev a6)
:00:01.1 0c05: 10de:00d4 (rev a4)
:00:02.0 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5)
:00:02.1 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5)
:00:02.2 0c03: 10de
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20072004,
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.6.7-5-amd64-generic #1 Thu Jul 15 02:11:18 CEST 2004 x86_64
unknown
Date: 21072004
Method: converted ISO to USB boot image, boot
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
