On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
> progress to fixing the issue.
I still feel this is an overreaction as only the original reporter has ever
see
(No need to CC on replies: I read the list.)
On Thursday 05 August 2010, Thibaut Girka wrote:
> If you're talking about user-setup, they are cleared, that the first
> thing I've checked (better done that checking network-console, it seems)
> before sending this mail.
With user-setup the passwords
On Thursday 05 August 2010, Thibaut Girka wrote:
> > Did you actually check this? The password templates are of type
> > 'password' and thus the value should be in
> > /var/lib/cdebconf/passwords.dat (and thus encoded) instead of in plain
> > text in questions.dat.
>
> Well, you can still db_get th
On Wednesday 04 August 2010, Thibaut Girka wrote:
> He starts the installation in front of the computer, sets a password,
> that happen to be its daily-use one.
That's not very smart, is it?
> Then, an untrustworthy colleague goes to the computer, and just
> reads /var/lib/cdebconf/questions.dat:
On Sunday 01 August 2010, Lee Winter wrote:
> > It means that we probably need a few more DD's to look at signalled
> > spam for the debian-boot mailing list through
>
> I disagree. I believe the above fact indicates that we need a better
> communication mechanism for reviewers, rather than more i
reassign 590993 debian-cd
severity 590993 normal
thanks
Since you are trying something that's not really supported, this is
certainly *not* a "grave" issue. After all, a CD image is not a mirror
even if both contain a repository.
It is correct that the error occurs because CD images have symlin
On Thursday 22 July 2010, Ed Kohlwey wrote:
> If I run this command from another machine on the LAN I get output from
> grep showing "Codename:squeeze", so its clear to me there's something
> misconfigured or broken in d-i.
That's the wrong assumption. Assume there's something wrong in your setup
> Basing on debcommit seems the only correct option to me. Possibly a
> fallback to stripped epoch could be used to cover current cases.
Actually, the best solution is probably to simply rename the tags in SVN to
include the epoch using 'svn mv'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ..
On Monday 19 July 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Christian PERRIER
wrote:
> > The packages I released were tagged with the attached script,
> > contributed by Joey back in.a long time ago..:-)
> >
> > Apparently, it does strip the epoch when calculating the ta
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 23:11 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > + if grep -q '^flags.*\blm\b' "$CPUINFO"; then
> >
> > Has this been tested with busybo
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> + if grep -q '^flags.*\blm\b' "$CPUINFO"; then
Has this been tested with busybox shell?
Does busybox' grep understand '\b'? I don't recall us using it anywhere
else in D-I.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3. The 686 flavour is considered unsuitable for some AMD K7 processors
>
> Problem 3 appears to be due to a workaround for an incorrect kernel
> configuration. The comment on this exclusion is 'May not have SSE
> support', but this has never been a re
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> So if I had used the one from
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/
>images/netboot/
>
> it would have worked?
No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from the
page I referred to! For
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a
> > current "D-I alpha 1" image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari.
>
> The
(Daniel: sorry for the private duplicate of this mail; no need to CC me.)
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I
> > images and as the Recommen
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I need to add such a file, but "svn add" apparently chokes on it:
>
> bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
>haracters> LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found
> bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/d
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for
> popularity-contest, which I believe i a better place to implement the
> change.
No, it is not reasonable to ask packages to change functionally correct and
policy-compliant dependencies
(Replying to list only.)
On Friday 16 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Please make some effort to understand how things work before making
> > wild guesses.
>
> I've spent an effort over several years to understand how d-i is
> working, but thank you for voicing your concern.
For your ed
On Thursday 15 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I suspect the change you propose can not be implemented by
> debian-installer, but instead would have to be done by changing cron
> or any other package pulling in the mta package. At least the way d-i
> is designed at the moment.
And on what
On Thursday 15 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> From the looks of it, exim4 is installed because of a Recommends: by
> the cron package:
>
> Recommends: exim4 | postfix | mail-transport-agent, lockfile-progs
How exactly did you determine this? I doubt it is cron as Recommends are
not ins
tag 580508 pending
thanks
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The chapter numbers of the brltty manual have unfortunately changed.
> The attached patch points at its index instead of directly to a chapter
> number.
Updated. I've used a different patch as IMO the text where the URLs
tag 579954 pending
thanks
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It has been reported that it would be useful to add a link from the
> accessibility to the boot screen section, as the attached patch does,
> since the latter describes precisely how keypresses work there.
I've added the li
On Saturday 01 May 2010, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:13:56AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > It's time for another upload of the Installation Guide.
>
> Hi Frans, please consider applying the attached patch (or something
> along the lines), which IMO g
On Friday 30 April 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Add 2010 to the copyright hint on the first side of the manual?
>
> Copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 the Debian Installer team
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > OK, I'll add them to the packages_list file after we're done with
> > > the beta1 release preparation.
On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> OK, I'll add them to the packages_list file after we're done with the
> beta1 release preparation.
Why wait?
> This way, trnaslators can work on them and, if we happen to release a
beta2, or rc1, these packages will at least have some localiz
Dear Stephen,
On Monday 12 July 2010, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Here's a nickel, kid, buy yourself a sense of humor. The entire message
> was surrounded by giant blinking sarcasm tags.
Actually no, it wasn't. The only really clear clue was the last line.
The message was fairly long and especially t
On Monday 12 July 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > That was something I was looking
> > forward to fixing in the coming weeks.
>
> This is just a rant, no useful information.
Actually, it was a compliment disguised as a joke! I had to read it twice
myself to get it t
On Friday 09 July 2010, Ian Campbell wrote:
> In light of Frans' concern perhaps consider dropping 686 instead of 486?
> I think that will result in 686-bigmem being installed on systems which
> would have previously got 686 (I can confirm if necessary). This isn't
> necessarily a bad thing -- it e
On Friday 09 July 2010, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> True. Any better suggestions?
No. Not without doing substantial work on this, which I've already
indicated I'm not going to do this release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Friday 09 July 2010, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> What I've done for now is drop the -486 kernel flavour from the m-a
> netinst. From a test build I've just done, everything fits on a single
> CD again, even with firmware included. If people want to install from
> a netinst onto a pre-686 machine the
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Frans Pop (06/07/2010):
> > The proposed fix could well be OK, but maybe the code can be fixed a
> > bit earlier so the trailing comma is avoided in the first place?
>
> Whatever unbreaks g-i.
Not really. There's also s
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> 5. Fix for real:
> Edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/keyboard-configuration.config, and add the
> following line in ask_debconf(), right before the if part, once all
> choices have been merged together:
> choices=`echo $choices | sed 's/,$//'`
On Sunday 04 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Looks so, I never expected that the two packages could get out of
> > sync.
>
> Is there some way to get the udevadm settle command work also with
> older udevd versions? Can the protocol be changed?
This is a D-I release management problem a
On Tuesday 29 June 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > NACK. The errors are too useful to suppress.
> >
> > I disagree. The error in question is almost useless. There is no way
> > to see which URL was missing, and the message show up in the wrong
> > location in the l
On Tuesday 29 June 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Frans Pop]
> > So, one wget results in a 404. As choose-mirror tries various
> > possible suites and codenames and wgets are used for other purposes
> > as well, a 404 is always a possibility.
>
> Sure, but all the
On Tuesday 29 June 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> In Debian Edu, we automatically search for error: in the installation
> log to detect errors during installation.
Then it seems you need to make an exception for this error.
> When PXE installing, I get this one:
>
> Jun 28 23:18:29 main-men
On Monday 28 June 2010, Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote:
> So, I would like to skip at stage 5, the following modules:
>
> - base-installer
> - user-setup
> - apt-setup
> - pkgsel
>
> Is that possible?.
Create a custom udeb that runs before base-installer, does the rsync and
provides the udebs you want
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [1] Checking installation of packages using apt-install is much
> > harder to do as there are many different calls and failure may be
> > expected in some cases. It also gains much less as their total size
> > is much less.
>
> I believe it wou
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Rick Thomas wrote:
> If you are *very* short of disk space, doing it twice might make sense.
Nonsense. If you're that short on diskspace you have a totally unusable
system anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Maybe, for more corner cases where keepign the cache would be
> good, could we have a low priority option (or a preseed-only choice)
> to *not* clean the cache?
I don't think it has anything to do with user choice or preseeding. Making
this a deb
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> Any disk space savings are IMO illusionary as the cache will fill up
> again anyway during later updates and any system that does not have
> sufficient disk space to hold a decent package cache will also have
> serious problems during later st
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> The main reason IIRC is that leaving the packages makes it unnecessary
> to download them again if part of e.g. tasksel fails for whatever reason
> and the user has to install some packages manually [...].
Note that the above argument is on
On Saturday 19 June 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I see no reason for leaving .deb files in /var/cache/apt/archives on a
> fresh installation, so let's run apt-get clean before reboot.
This has been suggested and discussed before. IIRC (but I may be mistaken)
Joey has always been against it.
T
On Sunday 20 June 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2010-06-19 12:35]:
> > > The following patch, which clears the cache after debootstrap and
> > > then again at the end (after kernel/extra packages), works for me.
> > > OK to apply?
> >
> > Conceptually it is OK but why not mov
On Saturday 19 June 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> cleanup () {
> + rm -f /target/var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb 2>/dev/null || true
> rm -f "$KERNEL_LIST" "$KERNEL_LIST.unfiltered"
> }
Shouldn't this call 'apt-get cleanup' in /target instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >I'm afraid I don't have any good ideas. Is this particular image
> >supposed to contain a complete base system or just enough to fetch the
> >remainder of the base system from the net?
>
> The netinsts are meant to have the base system, yes. I can
On Tuesday 15 June 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps the firmware loading changes in hw-detect?
No way. That's nowhere near stable material.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Saturday 05 June 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > This is the second time you've missed spams others have found.
>
> As you seem to question the care I used for this work, could I mention
> that, well, two other people also missed two spams before I did. Maybe
> not the same ones, but still..
On Friday 04 June 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > I marked 20. Maybe I'm too strict -- which ones aren't spam?
>
> All are. Your list helped me spotting two spams I initially
> missed...Thanks for taking care to send your list.
This is the second time you've missed spams others have found.
IMO
> Detect device driver media from hardware manufacturer
>
> I find Frans' version more newbie-friendly but further from the
> original idea of "driver injection disks" (which is maybe described
> in some manufacturer documentation...or some Ubuntu documentation).
>
> "media" is less precise than "d
reopen 505609
reassign 505609 linux-2.6
affects 505609 lilo
thanks
Stephen Powell wrote:
> The real question is, "Why didn't the map installer get run during
> the kernel upgrade?"
[...]
> So is this a bug in the kernel maintainer scripts? Or is it a feature?
> I don't know. I'll leave that up
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org):
> > I don't know if all udebs are automatically included in d-i, but if
> > they are, I doubt d-i people will like the additional 1.3MB
> > uncompressed.
>
> They aren't automatically included.
But udebs we
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > Please install kde-config-tablet if a tablett (wacom-like)_is found
> > > and the user is installing kde task.
> >
> > Why not always, so that a wacom tablet that's plugged in later can
> > still be configured?
>
> I guess that could be done. it was
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Detect device driver media from hardware manufacturer
>
> I like that onethough it brings back wording to "any kind of
> driver disk" while the original idea was "very special things embarked
> in the devices itself" and was fitting something
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> _Description: Detect hardware manufacturer driver injection disks
1) Phrasing is convoluted.
2) IIUC they are not necessarily "disks"?
3) What exactly is "injection" here?
So maybe:
Detect device driver media from hardware manufacturer
--
To UN
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> Maybe use "hardware vendor" instead of OEM. Using just "hardware" does
> lose information as the essence is that the drivers are provided by the
> vendor, not by the distro.
Or maybe better "hardware manufacturer"
On Saturday 29 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > I replaced "OEM" by "hardware" in an attempt to unjargonize.
> >
> > And thereby losing information.
>
> Well, then define OEM in this contextThis acronym is used in each
> and every possible situation and nearly means nothing nowadays. S
On Friday 28 May 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frans Pop [2010.03.14.0811 +0100]:
> > > Yes, I think it should be in mdadm. It should be as easy as
> > > reverting
> > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=commitdiff;h=7d5c3964
> >
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Because the question is "where?". The lilo approach is "inside the
> filesystem", which can break. The grub approach is "right after MBR",
> which needs room there.
grub (legacy) can be installed in any partition. IIUC grub2 is limited to
being i
On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> "this OS release": we never talk like this in other parts of D-I. If
> we want to avoid branding ("this release of Debian"), we could at
> least use "this release of the operating system").
My first question would be: do the disks actually work
On Monday 24 May 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Is it possible to change the lenny arm guide so it points to the armel
> images?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://li
On Monday 24 May 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I noticed that http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ refers to the arm
> install guide and release notes rather than to that of armel. Since
> are is deprecated, I wanted to change the links to armel but then I
> noticed is that there's no install guide
On Monday 24 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 24 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > 3 languages were complete before sibyl-installer re-addition
>
> Sibyl installer strings can be recovered using msgcat from an older
> version of the PO file.
Done from revision 59835
On Monday 24 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> 3 languages were complete before sibyl-installer re-addition
Sibyl installer strings can be recovered using msgcat from an older version
of the PO file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Friday 21 May 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Unfortunately I still get the same error. I even 'rm -rf' the whole
> directory and started from scratch, but I still get the same error.
Give it some time...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Friday 21 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I also fixed hppa today
> >
> > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
> > initial run.
>
On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I also fixed hppa today
>
> Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
> initial run.
Ping. hppa is still not being built automatically.
TIA
--
To UNS
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Please provide references as new udebs are only allowed with approval
> > of the debian-installer team.
>
> I'm not aware of any such policy; there's no mention of such a
> requirement in the developers reference or debian policy manual.
http://lists.
> *Exactly* when did you do this? I suspect it was after the step of
> loading additional components? Before that point changing the language
> should work fine. After that point the language setting *is* changed,
> but you get English because other translations have been deleted to save
> memory.
severity 582223 normal
tags 582223 wontfix
thanks
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> partman wants to overwrite the swap partitions on a already setup
> machine. As swap partition can contain hibernation data, this is an
> data-destroying operation.
Doing any system install while th
On Tuesday 18 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org):
> > To the d-i team: you can start converting your packages to use the
> > official name now.
>
> Any objections for me to do this in SVN?
>
> Apart from changelog documentation, is there anything else
On Friday 30 April 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> It's time for another upload of the Installation Guide.
The new release has been uploaded.
The following translations have been disabled as they are incomplete:
Korean, Portuguese (BR), Spanish, Swedish.
Thanks to all translators for th
On Monday 17 May 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> The earliest possibility to reach the main menu in standard priority
> is when network configuration via DHCP fails or if I abort it before it
> succeeds.
I would say it is during keyboard selection (if you ignore the
localechooser dialogs). And you
reassign 581873 2.09 localechooser
block 581873 by 470258
thanks
On Sunday 16 May 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> If I remember now, that I wanted to do an italian installation (for
> example, every other choice does the same), and I go back to the
> "change language" step as soon as I can access th
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I also fixed hppa today
Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
initial run.
TIA,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
On Monday 10 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > I have an ext2 formatted usb stick
>
> The installation guide specifies that the stick should be *FAT* (or
> VFAT) formatted. ext2 may work with some installation methods, but not
> wit
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Henning Sprang wrote:
> O.k., I think that'll serve me to dowhat I want! One other thing that
> I don't find being documented anywhere is the use of scripting inside
> a preseed file. Seems like it's Perl?
No, shell script. No perl (or anything else) in the D-I environment.
CD builds are failing because (moved) win32-loader files are missing.
buildd needs update to latest version.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I just reenabled powerpc btw
Does not seem to have been built since 3 Apr. Forgot to enable in crontab?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> it seems like d-i daily builds are quite broken:
> | make[2]: `sources.list.udeb' is up to date.
> | util/get-packages: line 138: 7733 Segmentation fault $APT_GET
> | update Failed to update the Packages file. […]
I suspect this was from a log
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Henning Sprang wrote:
> I'm desperately trying to use something that I couldn't find being
> documented anywhere but a changelog entry that makes me believe it
> exists:
>
> Using multiple preseed files on a custom CD install - with the purpose
> of having a generic one for a
I've just uploaded an updated version of choose-mirror. There's only a fix
of a minor bug from the previous release, but the upload also contains an
updated mirror list.
Note that this update means debian-installer should also be updated before
the next point release. Are there any plans for th
On Monday 03 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 03 May 2010, Terry Stroup wrote:
> > On completing the partitioning, I get the following error:
> >
> > File system has an incompatible feature enabled. Compatible
> > features are "has_journal", &
On Friday 30 April 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> It's time for another upload of the Installation Guide. As we're getting
> closer to the Squeeze release I will drop incomplete translations this
> time. Most translations need updates.
>
> The deadline for translation updates is
reassign 580265 linux-2.6 2.6.32-9
thanks
On Tuesday 04 May 2010, Gmail Notifier wrote:
> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82578DC Gigabit
> Network Connection [8086:10f0] (rev 06)
> Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:0037]
> Kernel driver in use: e1000e
On Tuesday 04 May 2010, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> The d-i manual in file preseed.po has several msgids like these:
>
> msgid "debian-installer/framebuffer"
> msgid "language"
> msgid "debian-installer/language"
> msgid "country"
> msgid "debian-installer/country"
None of those should be translated.
tag 579995 moreinfo
thanks
On Monday 03 May 2010, Terry Stroup wrote:
> On completing the partitioning, I get the following error:
>
> File system has an incompatible feature enabled. Compatible
> features are "has_journal", "dir_index", "filetype", "sparse_super"
> and "large_file". Use "
reassign 579948 libparted0debian1 2.2-5
tags 579948 d-i
affects 579948 partman-base
thanks
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 03:57:48PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> ~ # fdisk -l /dev/sdb
>
> Disk /dev/sdb (Sun disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8864 cylinders
>
reassign 579948 partman-base
severity 579948 serious
thanks
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The display of partition sizes appears to be all screwed up (see the
> first attached screenshot).
Possibly a regression in libparted for sparc disklabel. Please send the
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> We're now in May, so it's time for our tireless reviewers to work on
> April 2010 archives.
>
> Should be easy: I found only 2 spams.
You've missed 1...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> You can at least run the installer up to the partitioning step...up to
> the moment where file systems are written on disk. But you won't reach
> the timezone selection step as it happens after this.
Not correct. TZ selection (clock setup) happens
On Saturday 01 May 2010, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> I have an old Apple PowerBook G3 (prism/bronze) and I'm trying to
> install Debian on it. I'm using a netinst CD dated 20100201. I tryed
> many times but installer stops installing base system, every time at a
> different percentage but when it s
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> 3) The system mumble a bit then show what i've attached.
> Here normally i choose what the installer propose: United States
> en_US.UTF-8.
That is correct. If you were installing in expert mode, you would have the
option to select it_IT.UTF-8 as ext
On Saturday 01 May 2010, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> And unfortunately I cannot reinstall on the qnap, I've already a fully
> working and configured system that is in use. and I cannot just ran
> the installer again there, I would need to re-flash it and probably
> lose everything.
If you abort the in
On Saturday 01 May 2010, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> I wanted to use an english locale/language with my timezone
> (Europe/Paris UTC+1 or 2) but that was not possible. After selecting
> english (or was it american?), I only had a very restricted list of
> timezones, with no obvious way around. So I had
It's time for another upload of the Installation Guide. As we're getting
closer to the Squeeze release I will drop incomplete translations this
time. Most translations need updates.
The deadline for translation updates is in two weeks: ***Monday May 17***.
Status info can be found at:
http://d-
On Monday 26 April 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Now I tried:
> 1dae5d9f29de2a3dd7a367d442921991 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> Still no luck.
OK. That excludes a known issue. It could still be a missing kernel module,
but that seems unlikely. Not sure what else it could be though. AFAIK U
Colin Watson wrote:
> I agree that it would make sense to ask this at (probably) medium
> priority, although I'm not sure when I'll have time to make this change.
> Perhaps somebody could file a reminder bug?
#579625
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Package: partman-base
A new template partman/alignment has been added which is currently only
preseedable. During a discussion [1] it was suggested that the question
should also be asked during interactive installs (at medium and/or low
priority and only for relevant disk labels).
The template
1 - 100 of 6359 matches
Mail list logo
