On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:19:16 +0300 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:37:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:22:46 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Dear console-setup package maintainers,
> > is there anything blocking th
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:22:46 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> In conclusion, it really appears to be the solution to be adopted in
> order to fix this issue: once again, please consider adding such file
> as /lib/udev/rules.d/90-setupcon.rules to package console-setup.
[...]
Dea
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:19:41 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just my +1
>
> Francesco Poli, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 19:00:30 +0100, wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Anyway, the things will work even without such checks, so maybe your
> > > proposed solution can be used unch
ere's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp92OeHMYhTv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:42:34 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:54:01PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Dear console-setup maintainers, this bug has been reported quite some
> > time ago: is there any progress on this?
>
> In order to be
rogress on this?
Please fix this issue.
Thanks for your time!
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFF
! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp9WUY012l1S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
...
Thanks for your time and helpfulness.
Bye!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpZtfYrt9Y0O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:17:55 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> After booting the installed system, I noticed that the /etc/fstab
> needed to be fixed by hand.
[...]
I forgot to mention that this bug looks similar to #609716, but it is
not exactly the same...
I experienced #
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Hello,
I would like to report a successful (well, let's say almost successful)
installation, with a single little issue in the auto-generated /etc/fstab
file.
The issue may be easily fixed by hand, but, still, I think it's caused
by a bug:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:07:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > >
> > > Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in
> > > xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:49:36 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> >
> > > > I suppose that only the horizontal lines are broke
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you
> > wanted. Instead of telling me the name of the used font (
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:53 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
> > have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
> >
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:19:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
> > If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
> > again, then the output of
> >
> > $ toilet -f f
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.50
Severity: normal
Hi (again)!
During the discussions for bug #546983, console-setup was greatly
improved by Anton Zinoviev (which I would like to thank again):
the console is now able to display 'toilet -f future' symbols in a
strange, yet charming way, by usin
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.50
Severity: normal
Hi and thanks for maintaining console-setup!
On a box where console-setup-mini was installed, I issued the following
command:
# aptitude install console-setup console-setup-mini-
in order to switch from console-setup-mini to console-setup.
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:32:25 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > > Where can I find a list of the symbols that the fonts in console-setup
> > > need to support?
> >
> > As far as the toi
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:56:59 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know why the fonts in console-setup didn't work for you (as I
> > > don't use toilet)
> >
> > I
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:16:22 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I really appreciate you efforts to report everything relevant in the bug
> tracking system.
I am glad you find my efforts useful! :-)
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:03:37AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:03:37 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I will try and perform some more tests tomorrow...
Let's *really* restart from scratch:
# aptitude -t unstable install console-setup console-setup-mini-
This installed console-setup/1.46 and console-terminus/4.28-
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:42:02 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:26:52AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > If you are able to suggest better fonts, please do not hesitate to do
> > so!
>
> First you need to install console-setup. Console-setup-min
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:43:29 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:50:38PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> >
> > Despite XKBLAYOUT is clearly set to "it", I still get a US keyboard
> > map on the console (X is fine, instead).
>
>
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:50:38 +0200 Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
> Today, I booted up the notebook and logged in on the console
> (I do not use any graphical login manager) and noticed that
> the keyboard layout was set to US, while my notebook has an
> Italian keyboard
[...]
&
Package: console-setup-mini
Version: 1.44
Severity: important
Hi!
I upgraded my Debian testing (squeeze) notebook yesterday and various
packages were upgraded (among which several xorg packages).
Due to dependencies, console-setup-mini was pulled in, as confirmed
by /var/log/aptitude :
[INSTAL
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:32:00 +0200 Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:29:23PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I am not completely sure I understand what direction was taken to fix
> > the bug: does partman-lvm use decimal (i.e.: SI) multiples everywhere
>
w*, on both input and output, consistently with the rest of partman?
Could you please clarify?
Thanks in advance.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:28:48 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 21:55, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I see the FSF and GNU links fixed (and that's OK), but I still see
> > the seemingly off-topic link to http://www.li.org/linuxhistory.php .
>
> Thanks fo
-through?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpVnjVgGQmeu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:51:58 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I set the severity of this bug to "important" bug, since it has a
> > major effect on the usability of a package, but I strongly believe
> > that et
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 50
Severity: important
Hi!
I'm again trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on the
same brand new machine, as described in bug#411586.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:04:02 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 411586 partman-lvm
> severity 411586 minor
> thanks
I think you forgot to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
>
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:44, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I cannot understand what's wrong.
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 18
Severity: normal
Hi!
I'm trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on a brand new
machine.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1 20070218-08:47
that is to say
http://cd
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 6.3.2.1. _Partitioning Your Disks_[1] states:
| If you choose guided partitioning using (encrypted) LVM, the installer
| will also create a separate /boot partition. The other partitions,
| except for the swap partition,
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 1.2 _What is GNU/Linux?_[1] states, in part:
| Development of what later became GNU/Linux began in 1984, when the
| _Free Software Foundation_ began development of a free Unix-like
| operating system called GNU.
|
| The G
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 1.1 _What is Debian_[1] states, in part:
| Debian is an all-volunteer organization dedicated to developing free
| software and promoting the ideals of the Free Software Foundation.
I'd say that Debian promotes (or shou
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:39:21 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 04 January 2007 17:16, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > But nothing asked me whether the hardware clock was in local time or
> > UTC!
> > It was silently assumed to be UTC, which, BTW, was I what I wanted
> >
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:11:36 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:30, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > No problems AFAICS.
> > Note that I tested the guided partitioning of the entire disk with
> > encrypted LVM (choosing to separa
Package: installation-report
Severity: wishlist
Boot method: multi-arch netinst CD (as of 2006-12-28)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-testing-MULTI-NETINST-1.iso
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:50:33 +0100
Machine: assembled box
CPU: Pentium
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:02:55 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:27, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I'm talking about the published stable version of the manual: it's
> > been the same exact version since June 2005 so far (or am I wrong?).
>
> Yes,
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 16:35:33 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:50, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > The problem is: figuring out where to get the source by looking at
> > the webpage[1] is not made easy. In that page[1] there are links
> > for a great number
reopen 401233 !
thanks
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:50:02 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> reopen 40123 !
^^^
> thanks
[...]
Let's see if this time I manage to reopen the right bug! :-/
I hope I didn't reopen a very old bug by mistake:
http://bugs.debian.org/40123 gives the
reopen 40123 !
thanks
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:05:22 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 00:59, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian
> > Installation Guide.
>
> For the Sarge version: apt-get source debia
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian Installation
Guide.
At the Debian Documentation Project page[1], there's a Subversion
command line that will probably checkout the latest development
version (right?). This seems OK.
44 matches
Mail list logo
