On 31/08/07, Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:45:24PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > >> Hi folks
> > >>
> > >> I prepared a busybox update. The following changes are not yet done:
>
Package: installation-report
Severity: important
Hello,
I tried the Etch MA image and an Etch netboot on a desktop. The
installer failed to detect the network interface. I think the problem
lies somewhere in the kernel or in some basic library since lspci did
not returned any results in DI and a
Package: ppp
Tags: patch d-i
Severity: important
Hello,
Attached is a patch that closes a few open issues with the ppp-udeb.
The most important are #402450 (not bringing up the interface after
install and not saving a correspondent section in the target
/etc/network/interfaces) and the handling
tag 384121 patch
tag 385150 patch
thanks
On 27/09/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:34:57PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
>
> Please do test without the "|| true" code attached to apt-install and
> with the db_stop line removed or commented out.
>
> I expec
On 25/09/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> A round of PPC tests would be useful, especially it happens to find
> >> owners of ATI or NVIDIA boards.
> >
> >
> > Got one.
>
> Eddy, do you have the chance to test if forcing off DFB&#
On 23/09/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> A round of PPC tests would be useful, especially it happens to find
>> owners of ATI or NVIDIA boards.
>
>
> Got one.
Eddy, do you have the chance to test if forcing off DFB's
On 23/09/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, about the console font corruption with radeonfb, i would be interested
> in feedback of if it is a powerpc only issue, or ppc stuff ?
No idea, i on no radeon boards :(
$ lspci | grep ATI
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Colpart wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:01:43AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
It seems (thanks again Joey) that the problem is the db_stop line
which, if commented out should kill the problem appear in both of
these cases.
Gregory kno
On 18/09/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:31, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Have you seen the vertical line in the upper right corner?
Yes, I already reported that one a long time ago...
Hmm, I was under the impresion that the vertical line should
On 18/09/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, let's assume for now that I am not crazy.
If I run g-i in vmware, I get this:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_lineheight-and-ugly-font.png
That is almost double lineheight between choices! Also, does the font look
uglier than it used
On 05/09/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here are bits from my (nightly) PPPoE tests with d-i.
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:06:45AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> >> >Then tell me if things improve? With logs, if not.
> >
> >Same problem with debconf error.
I retry/retry/retry
On 11/09/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
to the
> previous, see [3]
>
> feedback is very welcome
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01178.html
[2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/
On 10/09/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
> +iplocated_country=`wget -q http://api.hostip.info/country.php -O - | head -c
2`
This is a third-party point of failure. Altough your code does
gracefully degrade if it fails. Would Debian be able to run this service
itsel
On 01/09/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 04:21:33AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> It should be in /var/lib/dpkg/ppp-udeb.postinst, sorry for forgetting that
> info.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ppp-udeb.postinst ;)
Indeed.
> >Then tell me if things improve? Wit
On 31/08/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aug 31 00:24:00 pppd[11082]: pppd 2.4.4 started by (unknown), uid 0
> Aug 31 00:24:00 apt-install: Queueing package ppp for later installation
> Aug 31 00:24:00 main-menu[2142]: (process:10955): 0
> Aug 31 00:24
On 31/08/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Sorry for the lag of my answer, I was on "pseudo-[VAC]".
NP, this debugging is not such a pleasure :-D
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:24:31PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> Could you please set DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 at boot time an
On 29/08/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/08/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is it not really a bug in the strict sense of the term, as this is
> simply the default behaviour of GTK+.
> Anyway, i'll try to see if it'
On 29/08/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is it not really a bug in the strict sense of the term, as this is
simply the default behaviour of GTK+.
Anyway, i'll try to see if it's possible making the enter key activate
the ok button (and it should be).
What? Are you sure yo
On 29/08/06, Abel McClendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For assistance in debugging a "simpler" syslog is attached.
the failure is towards the end of the log...
of course i did the "mv" patch...
going to try again with the latest build.
A custom image could be built with the patched ppp-udeb p
clone 384709 -1
# I haven't analysed the whole bug report, but I'll take this ppp-udeb
# related issues int consideration for bug -1
reassign -1 ppp-udeb
retitle -1 unsanitized output, makes debconf think an error appeared
thanks
On 27/08/06, Abel McClendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > c
On 27/08/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Indeed, this was discussed many times, but I think the main stopper is
> their real meaning (which in turn is 0 information for a newbie user).
>
> I would suggest:
> businesscard -> keychain
>
clone 384709 -1
reassign -1 cedebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle -1 display issues in chekbox lists
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27/08/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(this is back in public)
> > > check this out and keep the URL under your hat ;-) if someone finds
> > > it.. fine... no reason to publicize it..
> > > I am sending a install report that almost mirrors this.
(this is back in public)
On 27/08/06, Abel McClendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Things should be easier now, as I have found ou about
> > > DEBCONF_DEBUG.
> > >
> > > Could you please set DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 at boot time and run the
> > > PPPoE step (after doing the move of the plugin) and sen
On 24/08/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Marco,
(Pathes were intentionaly not forwarded since they are already in BTS)
I just realised I sent this to -quiet.
A fix for this bug is attached. Please note that I have updated the
Romanian translation, too.
Now I have a
On 24/08/06, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
(please CC: me)
I tested the current Beta 3 of the installer (my aim was not to install a new
system, that's why I send no installation report) and want to inform you about
my experiences. There are many little issues which are mostly not
On 24/08/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:58:07PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> >Then my PPPoE connection is up correctly (I can wget web files
> >on busybox) even I have the red screen [!!] Configure and start a
> >PPPoE connection, "Installation step f
On 23/08/06, Abel McClendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
actually it's a different error that occurs after the 'mv'.
the "mv" fixes one issue.
I understand.
the other issue has to do with which physical device is actually
connected to the DSL service provider. (usually in my case(s) a bridg
On 23/08/06, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:10:08PM -0400, Abel McClendon wrote:
> check bug #384121
Indeed, it's exactly same problem.
> > and issue the command
> > "mv /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4b1 /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4"
With this workaround, I retry my tests wi
On 20/08/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 01:13, Frans Pop wrote:
> Author: fjp
> Date: Sat Aug 19 23:13:50 2006
> New Revision: 4
^
Another milestone reached...
I still wonder why we don't consider milestones at revisions with
numers rep
On 18/08/06, Tapio Lehtonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
more readable.
I mean, text like this is pretty bad for reading:
msgid ""
"The benefit you gain depends on
On 18/08/06, Tapio Lehtonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it necessary to have the installer guide msgids in po files one
huge line? It would seem to me they could be indented to make them
more readable.
I mean, text like this is pretty bad for reading:
msgid ""
"The benefit you gain depends on
On 17/08/06, Stephen Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am interested in using the first two udebs (cfg-netcfg and
cfg-partman). How do I get a copy of them? How do I set up ETCH to use them?
If you want the binaries you can grab them from the mirrors (under
debian-installer, instead of debia
On 02/08/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 13:18, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > > That's why automated partitioning exists (question for others, is
> > > "automated paritioning in free space" an option currently present
On 02/08/06, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that, generally the defaults chosen in the installer are prety
> decent and in most cases you will need to adjust questions' priority
> minimal level that needs to be shown.
Actually I was planing to create such a "Debian Desktop"
On 31/07/06, Hans-J. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear developers,
Hello Hans
I would be pleased, if you could tell me your thoughts about some points,
which came in my mind.
1. In the past I discovered the project "FAI" by Thomas Lange and changed it
to the possibility to install not a
On 29/07/06, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a i386 is lspci present in the recent builds op debian-installer.
While the installer waits for a keyboard selection,
I switched to the second console and typed `lspci`
and got the output of lspci.
Could this be verified on a powerpc co
On 30/07/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 02:49:53PM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > It would be nice if this text were more generic so that derived
> > distributions didn't have to mess with it. How about "only the core of
> > your new sys
On 28/07/06, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Hello!
I've made a proof-of-concept d-i build with grub as the CD loader:
http://aybabtu.com/rmh/d-i_with_grub.iso
cool
Pros:
- boot screen not shown at all unless requested with ESC (avoids confusing
newbie users).
- op
On 28/07/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> May I suggest removing "your" from your proposed text? It seems more
> professional to me.
At the moment, only the core of the system is installed. To tune the
system to your needs, you can choose to install one or more o
On 24/07/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Pierre Broeders wrote:
> I have a problem after i flashed for the last time using this manual:
> http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/
>
> After is flashed "debian-sda1.bin", I shutdown the power and connect my
> usb harddisk. When I power my n
Please submit an bug against the installation-reports meta package.
(Hint: using reportbug will allow to generate a proper installation
report).
On 24/07/06, AlexB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good day everyone,
just managed to install Debian unstable to an IBM p570 LPAR. Generally
installation w
On 24/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
> The release preparation page on the wiki [1] is mostly up-to-date with
> regards to issues and TODO items before the release.
After a week or so of silence on the g-i, a quick note about the status
of gtkdfb libra
On 24/07/06, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The installer started in text mode and not g-i, I assume it's something
to do with qemu.
Note that the installer does no0t default yet to GUI, you need to boot
with "installgui" to start the graphical installer.
--
Regards,
Eddy
On 21/07/06, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:13:51PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> Some testing also noted that /etc/apt/sources.list includes the
>> install CD as a source. I don't think this is a good idea
On 21/07/06, Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
this bug is fixed in experimental. Thanks!
What prevents you to upload the updated version into unstable?
The fact that the GNOME team will use which ever gtk+2.0 version they
see fit in order not to break GNOME.
Until the changes
On 21/07/06, Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
the package iso-codes could be hinted into testing today, if the D-I team
doesn't have any objections.
So RO is not 100% in the beta release :( #378665 (judging from the changelog) ?
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
On 20/07/06, Mark Pictor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something else: extended partitions aren't supposed to be
bootable, are they? Yet sda7 was set to boot, and it is extended,
not primary. sounds like a bug to me...
You are confusing logical partitions with extended partitions. The
later typ
On 18/07/06, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, the installation was done yesterday with an image built on
20060716 (July not June).
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
--
To UNS
On 16/07/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>ADSL does not imply PPPoE though. I have ADSL too, but don't need PPPoE.
In some countries (e.g. DE, IT) is always does for consumer connections.
Add RO to that list :-)
--
Regards,
EddyP
==
On 15/07/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 15 July 2006 09:40, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Recent ppp package versions have bringed an enhanced ppp-udeb package
> which allows configuring a PPPoE connection for the installer. Thanks
> a lot for this work.
I have not really seen
(Keeping Marco CC-ed as I don't know if he is listed)
On 15/07/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco, Eddy and D-I team,
Hello,
Recent ppp package versions have bringed an enhanced ppp-udeb package
which allows configuring a PPPoE connection for the installer. Thanks
a lot f
On 16/07/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ATM there are 30+55 errors (suspect variables + level specific errors)
in level1 translations (see [1]).
Languages currently affected:
[snip]
Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
error-free set of translations
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where from can I get the gtk-demo app source?
usually it's built togheter with gtk libraries : you should have it
already compiled and ready to run somewhere in the gtkdfb packages you
built..
But those are linked against the X11 var
Hello all,
Please excuse the spam, just wanted to announce I will not be
available during the next week as I will be on vacation.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Forgot the patch
On 05/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: ppp-udeb
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hello,
This patch should provide pppoe functionality to the D-I images, if
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imaginat
Package: ppp-udeb
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hello,
This patch should provide pppoe functionality to the D-I images, if
loaded and ran from D-I itself. It also provides a Romanian
translation of the used debconf templates.
It still needs some polishing and some answers[1][2], bu
The new packages:
http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/
It seems nobody complained about this, but the permissions are wrong
for this. I will fix them tonight when I get home.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than
On 03/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also remember that on sven's macintosh (which should be similar o
> yours), back at extremadura, we had to boot textua, run gtk-demo, close
> gtk-demo, and then run the graphical installer as we were experiencing a
On 03/07/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be
> > released.
>
> This has just happened. It has been uplo
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This evening i built a test tarball, similar to those i used to build
when developing the GTK frontend, to test the web frontend with thttpd
in a real d-i environement.
The results were encouraging, even if a lot of work has to be done ye
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> does anyone has a
>> better candidate than webfs ()?
>
> I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
> that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
> be smaller.
Good advice : i install
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unst
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs and this could be bug #342053 :
have you tried booting with the textual frontend, adding "no-hardware"
to directfbr
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I've build the image with gtk 2.8.18...and it crashes.
A friend tested the PPC mini ISO on a minimac and he had to boot with
video=ofonly to prevent the installer from crashing, and colours were
mess
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
Note that I ran a session with video=ofonly which also crashed, but I
didn't made a trace.
I looked at both df
On 30/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
[snip]
I've build the image with gtk 2.8.18...and it crashes.
> > For sure new libraries will need some testing.
>
> If others don't obj
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
On 29/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc bugs
> >
Hello all,
I wanted to point out that the translation status page could use some
cleanup in the news section.
The last entry is from 2004/04/27 which, in my universe does not count
as news ;-).
Probably is wise if the news section is shortened and (if desired) the
old entries are moved in anoth
On 29/06/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 10:19, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> If others don't object, then, after te build of the images, I shall
> make a call for testers for the iso image with new libriaries..
Please test it extensively yourself
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc bugs
>> were gone with newer libs.
> I am also curious about this. Probably some publicity on -powerpc,
> after I have build some images might be a good way to attract t
As a summary, now we have on powerpc:
> I have recompiled the cairo packages yesterday for powerpc tried to
the cairo packages are at:
http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/cairo/libcairo-1.1.10-2/
and gtk+2.0 packages:
[1] http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-pp
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Done, they are available on my router[1], in case anybody else wants them.
> Man, the compilation needed about 1.5GB free disk space..
>
> [1] http://eddyp.homelinux.net:8080/eddy/g-i/gtk2.8-ppc/libs/gtk/2.8.18-4/
On 27/06/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le mardi 27 juin 2006 à 00:29 +0200, Davide Viti a écrit :
> I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
I've rebuilt gtk+ against a fixed glib, the correct cairo, and without
all loaders except the PNG one. Same place:
On 6/24/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont
> have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil
> was announced a supported lan
On 6/23/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F
On 6/23/06, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
where can i submit some wish list bugs?
cdebconf-gtk-udeb package.
i re-installed yesterday my laptop, and i found some flaws in it, mostly
non searchable box for languages, keyboards, etc.
Where did you got from the image you tested. Some o
On 6/21/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We think there's everything you need to produce gtk+-directfb packages;
it's not officially available yet, but packaging could be done anyway
and would help the d-i team to start working on migrating from old
libraries to new ones.
Your help is
On 6/20/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:50:31PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
following the wiki or using the build script committed in extremadura you
should be able to build any of the g-i libs and that is what Sven, Attilio
and myself did. Packagi
On 6/20/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:50, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Dave announced the availablity of the cairo packages for quite a while
> and I haven't seen any move from the gtk/gnome team. The most
> important thing I learen in OSS i
On 6/20/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > why?
> > The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the
> > gtk+-directfb packages.
>
> I wanted to do so... and if I do it right, their work will be less.
I'm not sure they need help on packaging; I might be wrong but
I don't th
On 6/20/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been fighting the whole Sunday to make a patch to the debian
> package gtk+2.0 so that it produces also a library with the directfb
> backend.
why?
The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the gtk+-directfb
packages.
I wa
On 5/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Emmel wrote:
> I think a lot of the issues were actually 64 bit stuff thats
recently been fixed
> any chance you could try 25.1 ? or a cvs build just to see.
> I believe the problems were down in the directfb layer so it would
be
> nic
On 6/17/06, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > And what has that to do with anything ? I have no interest in
> > > going into this hate-game, i want the situation solved, and be
> > > able to commit as any normal DD would.
> >
> > You have that already. There are >1000 DD's, and onl
On 6/14/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
If any powerpc people care, I build both 1.1.6 and
On 6/15/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fix given in #372773 is working for me, too. This seems weird, the
> G-I daily worked fine for me around the 18th of May. Is this due to
> directfb 0.9.24?
uhm.. afaik daily images are still built with DFB 0.9.21: migration to
DF
On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> > On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >&g
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably non D-I udebs should be on this list, too. (I personally have
fixed this for ppp-udeb and hope to publish it tonight, after some
testing).
I am sorry, I couldn't make this happen due to some problems with the
internet c
Hello all,
I have reported this issue for about a week and I don't know yet if is
related to #372773, but the G-I interface (powerpc daily image)
crashes and I haven't seen anybody interested in fixing this issue.
Can somebody confirm/infirm this?
Tests have been ran on a PowerBook5,2.
I have
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in experimental?
>
> It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it -
> and whether to set it for experimental or unstable.
On 6/13/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Don't forget as there are new deb packages here, there's at least a
>> month to
>> wait for the NEW "queue" to p
On 6/13/06, Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ATM Debian-Edu is not installable because the change from
prebaseconfig.d to finish-install.d since we use etch as basis of our
CDD. This here is a list of the packages which still install scripts
into the /usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/ dir in et
On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the same place as the othe
On 6/12/06, Sandesh Sethia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
This is my first post on this group. I am a novice programmer who
wanted to know that can I use GTKDFB for creating a PNG image of any window
(browser especially) delivered to the GTKDFB toolkit through a C++ program ?
I do n
On 6/11/06, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that this is blocked for Etch by the fact that [decent] PPP support
is no more present.
I have been working recently on the PPPoE issue; is almost finished
but I still face two problems.
For more information see threads related to:
h
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
>
> You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to:
"> On
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and
-dev.udeb in the link provided by Dave.
Ok, th
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say what? The source is the same...
But compiled with different flags
> that's what I said about three mails ago.
Then what you said three mails ago is wrong.
I was asking then if they were the same... and nobody said that I was
wrong abou
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
> Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Say what? The sour
On 6/9/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:37PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > Hmm, thining again at the problem...
> > We are using now the same source for building
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
