On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 03:22 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Drew, such conversion from xsfbs to dh should really be accompanied
> by
> a thorough debdiff check:
>
> $ debdiff --controlfiles=ALL ../libxcursor*changes
>
> which makes the breakage obvious:
> > Shlibs files of package libxcursor
Christian PERRIER a écrit:
> There's one: the LANGUAGE variable. ...
> Northern Sami fallsback successively to:
> - Norwegian Bokmal
> - Norwegian Nynorsk
> - Danish
> - Swedish
Ah, that sounds like a good mechanism. I am satisfied :)
> turned out to be sensitive: Ukrainian was falling back
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first release
> candidate release of the installer for Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze.
> ...
> * Localization:
> ...
* 70 languages activated (included English);
>* For 57 of these, t
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:04 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:39:22AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > I fail to see why this
> > > would be a problem or is, indeed, relevant.
>
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:18 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I fail to see why this
> would be a problem or is, indeed, relevant.
I'm sorry, Wouter, it's not clear to me that you correctly read the
problem I was describing.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:40:17AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Robert wrote:
> > >
> > > as far as i know it's also possible to set the counter to a specific
> > > value, which might be bet
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:54:24AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > You're taking it too disastrously. The problem I'm trying to solve is
> > when the max mount count is reached, this is the case in which the
Wouter wrote:
> > The problem then is when the partitions hit the forced-fsck mark, with
> > the default settings they all have to go through their fsck at the same
> > time. It takes time, and when all you had intended to do was to resume
> > out of suspend to quickly check some data, but came up
Robert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:40:05PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
> > could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
> > partition on every 20 mounts, the second on every
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 09:57 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 08:40, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
> > could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
> > partition on every 20
Hi debian-installer people,
Partitions have a counter so that an fsck is forced on them at reboot
after they have have mounted as certain number of times (I think it's
after 20 or 30 mounts).
The last time I checked, on a default installation with multiple
partition this forced fsck occured after
Hi,
I've just created the woody install CDs using jigdo on the files from
http://non-us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/current/jigdo/i386 (the "Europe"
link from http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/ for the official files).
The README.txt and README.html have not been updated for the final release
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:40:17PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > ...
> > > I just tested it on all the bootable
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
...
> I just tested it on al
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 03:46:13AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Here's a provisional list of packages which are standard or higher and
> should not be:
> exim we should move to postfix, IMHO
Just for education's sake, what are the reasons you hold this opinion?
I use exim simply b
15 matches
Mail list logo
