ld be in the environment. As far as I'm aware this hasn't been done.
HTH,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
ere it seemed to work nicely, so if you can improve
it then that's great!
If you have any questions do feel free to mail me directly, I'm much
more likely to see your mail that way.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tness (see #995833).
Yes, we probably do want to do that. I was going to vimdiff the configs
to see what we might need to change and harmonise between them. And
thanks for pointing out CONFIG_DESKTOP, though, I wasn't aware of it.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
a package, it would be entirely possible for telnetd to be included
in it. There is no timeline for the introduction of such a package and
every chance it might not happen, though.
Best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t
would be an alternative route for you to explore to introduce this
functionality in Debian.
Best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
27;ve also had a thought, and I can't remember if we've considered it
already: do the environment variables get preserved in /proc/1/environ,
even if busybox ash can't grok them? Could d-i be modified to pull them
from there?
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
rge/reinstall could well fix it, just double-check you haven't
ended up with *both* /bin/busybox and /usr/bin/busybox. You should have
only the former and should be able to safely remove /usr/bin/busybox,
assuming /bin/busybox is not a symlink anymore.
Best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
/usr/bin/busybox and the binary in
there. Do you have any idea where that came from?
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
this? I have
>>>> checked
>>>> the developer website (http://hands.com/d-i/) but the proxy argument is not
>>>> mentioned.
>>> You can preseed any question from the kernel command line, including the
>>> proxy
>>> one. The general sy
On 24/04/18 02:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Chris Boot (2018-01-22):
>> I think it would be helpful to start using Salsa for some of our repos.
>>
>> I would like to move my personal busybox work-in-progress repo to Salsa;
>> I know nothing prevent
or not. Whether this is done by asking for a
password anyway or by some other means is up for debate.
Is this what you meant?
If so I will bring it up for discussion on the busybox-users mailing list.
Best regards,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
C library, as broken.
To facilitate this busybox-static always prefers to run its own applets,
including dpkg, rather than the system-supplied binaries; if your system
is sufficiently broken that you are running busybox ash, it's a safe
assumption that your system tools are also hosed.
Th
at gcc points
at gcc-7 (>= 7.2.0-1~) in sid and, as far as I can tell, it also applies
to m68k.
To me this is really a gcc bug, and the fix belongs there. busybox has a
real interest in remaining small on several architectures, and I really
don't believe a workaround like this belong
On 23/01/18 15:17, Chris Boot wrote:
> On 22/01/18 17:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Chris Boot (2018-01-22):
>>>> What should it be called?
>>>
>>> Good question. d-i looks good
On 23/01/18 15:17, Chris Boot wrote:
> On 22/01/18 17:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Chris Boot (2018-01-22):
>>>> What should it be called?
>>>
>>> Good question. d-i looks good
On 22/01/18 17:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Chris Boot (2018-01-22):
>>> I think it would be helpful to start using Salsa for some of our repos.
>>>
>>> I would like to move my personal busybox w
hip anyway?
axhn: any objection to moving busybox into Salsa?
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e from Denys about this first but I don't have
any particular objection to patching this for Debian; I just want to
understand better why this was done upstream before simply reverting it.
We also have a new upstream release of busybox to push into unstable, so
it's tempting to roll this tweak in with that.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
reminds me quite a bit of shellshock, and that's not a path I
want to tread.
I'd like to spend a little time investigating this to correct the
behaviour without opening ourselves to security vulnerabilities. It's
not wrong that an environment variable probably shouldn't inc
ting one option over another
as I feel it represents a conflict of interest, but I'm definitely
interested in levelling the playing field and making it more difficult
to pick between the two!
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
GPG: 8467 53CB 1921 3142 C56D C918 F5C8 3C05 D9CE
use I suspect this is a documentation bug rather than actual broken
behaviour, I am reducing the severity of this bug.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
e widespread.
As you can see it's actually a critical piece of the puzzle in Debian,
so we're keen to make sure someone is actively taking care of it now
rather than the Debian Installer and/or kernel teams chipping in now and
again to fix the worst of the bugs.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chr
on, triage bugs, tidy things up and basically make the
Debian package look alive again. Please bear with us, this won't be a
quick process.
In the mean time, please let us know if you have any questions.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@debian.org
GPG: 8467 53CB 1921 3142 C56D C918 F5C8
23 matches
Mail list logo
