Hi,
the bug is more-or-less solved: I deleted the one partition that
caused the partial overlap. Then parted found my partitions, I created
a new one, and now everything is fine...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
> Can I use fdisk to de-overlap my partitions (the end-cylinder and the
> begin-cylinder of the next partition are identical!)?
FYI: I just tried to use gparted to resize my partitions.
But guess what: It doesn't recognize any partitions! :-O
Any ideas?
Thanks
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
> The bug probably really lies in parted, and is probably related to
> #418704. Could you please give use the full output (complete this,
> with sectors and size) of both "fdisk -l /dev/hda" and "parted /dev/hda
> print".
Hi there, thanks for the hints!
The problem is that parted thinks that my
Hi all,
I am still stuck installing debian on my laptop with partman denying
any partitions on the toshiba-hdd.
Can someone tell me how to use partconfig without involving partman
upfront?
This is really bugging me!
Thanks
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
> Unfortunately, the menu item "installer components to
> load" does not show partconf or anything similar.
Actually, partconf-find-partitions is included on the CD. I also think
that it is loaded as "additional component". But probably, it is part
of partman, and hence not listed as a separate me
> You could maybe boot in expert mode and install the "partconf"
> optional package when prompted for extra Debian Installer components
> to install.
Sounds good.
Unfortunately, the menu item "installer components to
load" does not show partconf or anything similar.
Can i build my own installer i
> Please, can you post the whole output of fdisk -l? I bet you have a
> dualboot system with Windows but I'd like to check that.
It is a bit cumbersome to get the debian-installer here, so let me try
to explain in words what is going on:
/dev/hda1 is a windows FAT partition indeed (marked bootabl
> Hmm, OK. That confirms that, as you suggested, partman (rather
> libparted) cannot read your partition table...and there really is a
> bug somewhere.
:-O
Does anyone know a way around this? Can I get an older installer
somewhere, install an old version, and then dist-upgrade step-by-step?
Than
> Hmmm, have you tried hitting Enter to select the drive that's
> displayed?
>
> *That* should show you the partitions to display, IIRC.
Not quite: He asks whether it is okay to generate a whole new
partition table (but I can still undo that). If I agree, I see one
more line underneath the drive s
Hi,
is there any way of bypassing the partitioning step in the debian
installer?
I want to use existing partitions to install debian, and I just have
to tell the installer which partitions to use.
The problem is that partman does not recognize the partitions (while
fdisk does).
Is there a way o
Hi,
I managed to obtain the partman logfile, see below.
My harddrive is Toshiba MK4025GAS, and partman can obviously not read
the partition table.
However, fdisk (when invoked from the console) can accurately access
the partition table!
Best,
Andreas
/var/log/partman:
/bin/partman:
package: partman
severity: important
I am just trying to install debian to existing partitions of the
harddisk of my laptop.
However, the "manual" partitioning method only shows the whole
Harddisk, and wants to create a new partition-table for the whole
disk.
This is true with the netinst-, as we
12 matches
Mail list logo
