Re: Indexes of DVD 2,3,... on DVD1?

2025-06-05 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 06:31:27AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > I just came across a StackOverflow question[1] where someone wants an > installation medium that works offline but does not ask for the extra disks > unless they are necessary. > apt-cdrom add DVD1 - repeat for DVD2 and DVD

Indexes of DVD 2,3,... on DVD1?

2025-06-05 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, I just came across a StackOverflow question[1] where someone wants an installation medium that works offline but does not ask for the extra disks unless they are necessary. Since we need the indexes and disc IDs, this is difficult to do with the current setup, but in principle I think it

Re: Uploading linux (6.12.32-1)

2025-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-06-05): > I would like to upload the next version of the 6.12.y stable series to > unstable (once linux/6.12.30-1 migrates to testing). There are two > upstream stable versions imported, 6.12.31 and 6.12.32 where 6.12.31 > was of considerable size (note there is ong

Uploading linux (6.12.32-1)

2025-06-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi I would like to upload the next version of the 6.12.y stable series to unstable (once linux/6.12.30-1 migrates to testing). There are two upstream stable versions imported, 6.12.31 and 6.12.32 where 6.12.31 was of considerable size (note there is onging merge window for 6.16 ongoing and from ex

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 05.06.2025 16:15, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:13:59PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: But I know right to nothing about ppc64 and its page sizes. Okay, so we should remove kvm support from ppc64*, because it is not supported anymore? I can't parse this sentence. There's

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Okay, so we should remove kvm support from ppc64*, because it is not > supported anymore? It looked to me as if all you have to do is pass a command line argument to qemu-kvm telling it to use 4k page size instead of the default 64k.

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:13:59PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > I definitely don't want to change upstream defaults here. And noone asked for changed defaults, just overriding them when it already saw it will not work. Bastian -- A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:13:59PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > But I know right to nothing about ppc64 and its page sizes. Okay, so we should remove kvm support from ppc64*, because it is not supported anymore? Bastian -- Insults are effective only where emotion is present.

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 04.06.2025 23:32, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 04:04:43PM +0530, Trupti wrote: Testing with the debian-testing-ppc64el-DVD-1.iso confirms that Debian Trixie on ppc64el currently installs a 4KB page kernel by default. This default (ref: #1074217) causes issues, especially for K

Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

2025-06-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:32:13PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 04:04:43PM +0530, Trupti wrote: > > Testing with the debian-testing-ppc64el-DVD-1.iso confirms that Debian > > Trixie on ppc64el currently installs a 4KB page kernel by default. This > > default (ref: #1074217)

Processed: reassign 1106658 to src:linux, found 1106658 in 6.15-1~exp1, closing 1106658

2025-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1106658 src:linux 6.12.30-1 Bug #1106658 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [installation-reports] installation-reports: Touchpad not active Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'src:linux'. Ignoring request to alter found ve

Bug#1106658: marked as done (installation-reports: Touchpad not active)

2025-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:11:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1106658: fixed in linux 6.15.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1106658, regarding installation-reports: Touchpad not active to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de