Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Am 27. Mai 2025 01:47:15 MESZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : >Holger Wansing (2025-05-26): >> - What happens, if both are installed at the same time? Any harm expected? >> - Is Debian an OS common for touch devices (= tablets)? I personally >> would go with the desktop variant only, if installi

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2025-05-27): > … and depending on your goals on the Lomiri side, maybe we could do the > opposite of what I was suggesting earlier: propose something small from > the installer, and let desktop users “upgrade” their systems by pulling > task-lomiri-desktop afterwards if they so ch

Processed: Bug#593105 marked as pending in tasksel

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #593105 [tasksel] tasksel: Please add a "Smartphone" task Added tag(s) pending. -- 593105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Holger Wansing (2025-05-26): > - What happens, if both are installed at the same time? Any harm expected? > - Is Debian an OS common for touch devices (= tablets)? I personally > would go with the desktop variant only, if installing both is not good. All good questions. Seeing how adding Phos

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Philip Hands
Cyril Brulebois writes: > [ cc += Guido Günther ] > > Philip Hands (2025-05-26): >> Combining this and the Phosh MR[1] ends up looking like this (1024x768): >> >> https://openqa.debian.net/tests/399843#step/choose_software/1 >> >> Lomiri currently appears twice, so that is 3 new entries with

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Mon, 26 May 2025 22:52:22 +0200): > > Lomiri currently appears twice, so that is 3 new entries with Phosh. > > > > BTW The descriptions for the 2 Lomiri tasks need to be fixed, in order > > to distinguish between the `desktop` and `tablet` variants, unless we > > decid

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
[ cc += Guido Günther ] Philip Hands (2025-05-26): > Combining this and the Phosh MR[1] ends up looking like this (1024x768): > > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/399843#step/choose_software/1 > > Lomiri currently appears twice, so that is 3 new entries with Phosh. > > BTW The descriptions fo

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Philip Hands
Cyril Brulebois writes: > At the moment, even if it's been growing as of late, the list doesn't > strike me as being “too long” (no, I don't have a precise definition for > it). Even with two extra desktop entries, the whole list of choices > would still appear on a single screen, and would be vi

Re: No speech in the alpha Installer, and speech freeze in Bookworm

2025-05-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Cleverson Casarin Uliana (2025-05-26): > Hi, Roland Clobus writes: > > After some more digging, we came up with another image for you to test > > (this time a network installer image): > > It turned out that the firmware needs to be made available in another > > location for the speech instal

Bug#1102140: marked as done (CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia)

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 May 2025 18:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103650: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.195 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103650, regarding CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Processing of apt-setup_0.195_source.changes

2025-05-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
apt-setup_0.195_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-setup_0.195.dsc apt-setup_0.195.tar.xz apt-setup_0.195_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1103650: marked as done (Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM)

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 May 2025 18:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103650: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.195 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103650, regarding Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM to be marked as done. T

Bug#1102140: marked as done (CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia)

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 May 2025 18:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102140: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.195 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102140, regarding CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#1103650: marked as done (Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM)

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 May 2025 18:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102140: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.195 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102140, regarding Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM to be marked as done. T

apt-setup_0.195_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-05-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 20:23:24 +0200 Source: apt-setup Architecture: source Version: 1:0.195 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-

Processed: forcibly merging 1106495 1106496

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1106495 1106496 Bug #1106495 [installation-reports] installation-reports: kernel image missing (Trixie RC1) Bug #1106496 [installation-reports] installation-reports: kernel image missing (Trixie RC1) Bug #1106496 [installation-reports

Bug#1106496: installation-reports: kernel image missing (Trixie RC1)

2025-05-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
[ re-added CC to the BTS and the merged bugs ] On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 07:38:45PM +, Sistemas Jaguar wrote: >On Sunday, May 25th, 2025 at 1:08 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Those log messages are not showing a failure due to a missing kernel >> image (that's ignored with a warning). Instead,

Bug#1102140: CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Testing/Trixie

2025-05-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 03:31:18PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >(Adding debian-cd list) > >On 28/04/2025 at 23:13, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >> On 13/04/2025 à 18:33, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >> > >> > In order to move forward I prepared a patch implementing the >> > following logic: >> > >> > if in

Processed: Bug#1103650 marked as pending in apt-setup

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103650 [debian-installer] Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM Bug #1102140 [debian-installer] CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia Ignoring request to alter

Processed: Bug#1102140 marked as pending in apt-setup

2025-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1102140 [debian-installer] CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Test/Trixia Bug #1103650 [debian-installer] Debian installer adds the CDROM in APT sources even when the installation source is not a CDROM Added tag(s) pending. Add

Bug#977877: console-setup: setupcon --setup-dir ... generates temporary file name inside etc/console-setup directory

2025-05-26 Thread Philip Hands
writes: > Hi Anton, > > Apologies for my late reply. > >> I don't feel myself competent to answer this question. > > You are listed as the maintainer of the console-setup package under > packages.debian.org [1]. Hence the question. Is the package maintained by > someone else now ? > On that not

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?

2025-05-26 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Cyril, On So 25 Mai 2025 17:18:20 CEST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hallo Mike, Mike Gabriel (2025-05-25): I have sort of asked for Lomiri inclusion in tasksel and installer here three weeks ago: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/merge_requests/30#note_609616 (and below). 3

Re: No speech in the alpha Installer, and speech freeze in Bookworm

2025-05-26 Thread Cleverson Casarin Uliana
Hi, Roland Clobus writes: After some more digging, we came up with another image for you to test (this time a network installer image): It turned out that the firmware needs to be made available in another location for the speech installer to work. It talked, hence it works! I actually had no

Re: Test image bug-1092977+intel+depmod+efd -> Success!

2025-05-26 Thread Roland Clobus
Hello Cyril, On 26/05/2025 01:03, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Here we go [+depmod]: https://people.debian.org/~kibi/bug-1092977+intel/debian-13.0.0-amd64-NETINST-1+depmod+efd.iso This includes your suggestion (on Salsa) to embed both packages at the same time, otherwise we only see the first or

Re: No speech in the alpha Installer, and speech freeze in Bookworm

2025-05-26 Thread Roland Clobus
Hello, On 20/05/2025 13:35, Cleverson Casarin Uliana wrote: Thanks but no luck. After some more digging, we came up with another image for you to test (this time a network installer image): https://people.debian.org/~kibi/bug-1092977+intel/debian-13.0.0-amd64-NETINST-1+depmod+efd.iso You'll

Re: Bug#1106070: Raising the severity?

2025-05-26 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 08:32:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi Roland, hi Cyril, > > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:44:42PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 25/05/2025 17:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > To be honest, I almost asked what