Bug#1100474: marked as done ([INTL:es] Spanish translation of blendsel debconf template)

2025-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 May 2025 08:55:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: #1100474[INTL:es] Spanish translation of blendsel debconf template has caused the Debian Bug report #1100474, regarding [INTL:es] Spanish translation of blendsel debconf template to be marked as done. This me

Re: Bug#1105164: linux-image-6.1.0-35-amd64: watchdog kernel module load errors with "Bad message"

2025-05-16 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi [not yet trimming the CC list to give a short update] On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:34:51PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi Robert, > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 04:38:19PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 6.1.137-1 > > Sev

Re: Is blendsel part of D-I RC1? (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

2025-05-16 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Am 17. Mai 2025 07:21:40 MESZ schrieb Andreas Tille : >I was particularly interested in the planned integration of blendsel. I >understand that it might already be included in this release, but I >didn’t find it mentioned in the changelog. Since this feature is quite >important to me, I just w

Is blendsel part of D-I RC1? (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

2025-05-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Holger, Am Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 10:20:19PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Since not everybody is reading the Blends list I've added the relevant > mailing lists in CC. I personally confirm for Dropped other lists in CC except debian-boot which is relevant for my question. I was very happ

win32-loader is marked for autoremoval from testing

2025-05-16 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
win32-loader 0.10.6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-05-30 It is affected by these RC bugs: 1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1 https://bugs.debian.org/1089276 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1079184: wine: Removes and generates debian/control at build t

Debian Installer Trixie RC 1

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first release candidate of the installer for Debian 13 "Trixie". Foreword Cyril would like to dedicate this release to his dad, Gérard Brûlebois, the nicest and kindest man one could ever dream of. Improvements in this release ==

Re: Bug#1105892: [pre-approval request] unblock: screen/4.9.1-2.1

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-05-16): > [Cc'ing as well debian-boot and Cyril, as screen produces a udeb and > needs an ack for d-i, additionally we are freezing udebs for the d-i > preparation] […] > Additionally there is an Upload from Chris Hofstaedtler > which has not yet migrated to test

Re: RFC MR: Update btrfs mount options

2025-05-16 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Pascal Thank you for your feedback, I sincerely appreciate it. Pascal Hambourg writes: > On 15/05/2025 at 20:43, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >> 1. Can the fstab tab mount line generating script handle both the = and : >> symbols? Ie, can partman-btrfs have "compress=zstd:1" in the lis

Bug#1105892: [pre-approval request] unblock: screen/4.9.1-2.1

2025-05-16 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: scr...@packages.debian.org, Axel Beckert (Debian Developer) , Christian Hofstaedtler , debian-boot@lists.debian.org, k...@debian.org, car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:screen User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags

Re: Saving some space on installation images

2025-05-16 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 15/05/2025 at 05:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have a number of unused udeb packages getting included. In other words, we could save some space! I suspect that

Re: Bug#1105882: unblock: util-linux/2.41-5

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hallo zeha, Chris Hofstädtler (2025-05-16): > [ Reason ] > Helmut Grohne requested in #1105006 a restriction to the libuuid > symbol files, to make a single symbol glibc-only. > > [ Impact ] > bootstrapping non-glibc archs fails without this fix. > > [ Tests ] > I've diffed the libuuid1 binary

Re: rescue_1.102_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-16): > However it may not work with a system installed from Debian live with > Calamares which appears to set a different btrfs subvolume layout (see > #1104552). I guess repair is possible in a live session but probably not as > automated as rescue-mode (select root parti

Bug#1105882: unblock: util-linux/2.41-5

2025-05-16 Thread Chris Hofstädtler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: util-li...@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:util-linux Please unblock package util-linux. [ Reason ] Helmut Grohne requested in #110

Re: rescue_1.102_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-05-16 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 16/05/2025 at 16:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote: with a tentative netinst for amd64, I deployed a laptop, full disk, switching the / FS from the default ext4 to btrfs, and proceeding as always for the rest. Then I broke the boot by removing the initramfs. Then ran d-i in (graphical) rescue mode,

Re: Bug#1105170: unblock: glibc/2.41-8

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2025-05-14): > If you can wait a few days, that would be best. I don't want to jinx > it so I won't mention the expected (short) timeline. > > Feel free to upload as soon as you see the announce hits the lists. Images are built and don't look too broken: udeb freeze just lifted,

Re: rescue_1.102_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Debian FTP Masters (2025-05-14): > rescue (1.102) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Re-upload without extraneous files. I have no idea what I'm doing, but in case it's a good sign I'll mention it anyway: with a tentative netinst for amd64, I deployed a laptop, full disk, switching the / FS fr

Processed: Re: Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1099535 ftbfs Bug #1099535 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] missing build dependency on apt Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1099535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Re: Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 1099535 ftbfs thanks El 16/5/25 a las 16:08, Cyril Brulebois escribió: tag -1 pending Bug #1099535 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] missing build dependency on apt Added tag(s) pending. Severity: normal vs. (theoretical) hard freeze is a bit of a disconnect… The initial descriptio

Processed: Re: Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1099535 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] missing build dependency on apt Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' -- 1099535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099535 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Re: Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Holger Levsen
control: severity -1 important thanks On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > The initial description didn't really imply there were any practical > issues; your commit message does quite the opposite. Let's bump the > severity to important for documentation purposes? (A

Re: Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Debian Bug Tracking System (2025-05-16): > Processing control commands: > > > tag -1 pending > Bug #1099535 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] missing build dependency > on apt > Added tag(s) pending. Severity: normal vs. (theoretical) hard freeze is a bit of a disconnect… The initial

Processed: Bug#1099535 marked as pending in debian-installer-netboot-images

2025-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1099535 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] missing build dependency on apt Added tag(s) pending. -- 1099535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099535 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: forcemerge

2025-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 807168 buildd.debian.org Bug #807168 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] debian-installer-netboot-images: required resources not declared as build-dependencies (fetches via network) Added indication that 807168 affects buildd.debian.or

Re: RFC MR: Update btrfs mount options

2025-05-16 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 15/05/2025 at 20:43, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: 1. Can the fstab tab mount line generating script handle both the = and : symbols? Ie, can partman-btrfs have "compress=zstd:1" in the list of mount options? I do not know if cdebconf supports "=" and ":" in item names (used to display

Bug#1088104: partman-auto-raid: Recipe delimiter parsing shortcoming restricts mdadm $EXTRA_ARGS

2025-05-16 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 14/05/2025 at 21:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Feel free to add this to the wishlist, without any promises though. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Trixie/Wishlist I can do it if Johannes agrees. I haven't tried to fully understand the patches and its implications, but that might