Re: RFC MR: Update btrfs mount options

Nicholas D Steeves writes: > 1. Can the fstab tab mount line generating script handle both the = and : > symbols? Ie, can partman-btrfs have "compress=zstd:1" in the list of > mount options? I worried for nothing, and confirmed this works fine. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your De

debian-installer-netboot-images_20250515_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 17:19:50 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20250515 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Bug#1103843: debian-installer: Installer generates apt sources.list that can be modernized

Hi, Christopher Bock (2025-05-15): > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:14:18 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Thanks for the report, but there's a bug report and a merge request > > against apt-setup already. > > I can't find either but maybe i'm just "blind". Would you be so kind > to provide the ref's?

Bug#1103843: debian-installer: Installer generates apt sources.list that can be modernized

Hey, On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:14:18 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Thanks for the report, but there's a bug report and a merge request > against apt-setup already. I can't find either but maybe i'm just "blind". Would you be so kind to provide the ref's? o/ -- Christopher Bok

Re: RFC MR: Update btrfs mount options

P.S. Yes, I also updated https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Trixie/Wishlist :)

Bug#1105822: installation-reports: ethernet detection sometimes fails after installation (NO-CARRIER)

On 15/05/25 at 15:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > However, after booting the installed system, ethernet randomly fails to be > detected after boot (after some boots it works, after some it doesn't). Even > if > a cable is plugged, no network leds light up. When this happen, one can simply > 'ip

RFC MR: Update btrfs mount options

Hi, I opened an MR for discussion because we were so close (and now into) the freeze, and because I won't be able to find answers for a couple of questions in any kind of timely manner. Here are the questions; please feel free to reply either here or at the MR: 1. Can the fstab tab mount line g

Bug#1105822: installation-reports: ethernet detection sometimes fails after installation (NO-CARRIER)

On 15/05/2025 at 15:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Machine: Olimex A20-OLinuXino-LIME2 rev C (...) I did not find a bug report about this issue I also faced this issue but was lazy. It may be related with this but I haven't investigated:

Re: Added Trixie bootloader splash screen

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 07:38:48PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: >Hi, > >Steve McIntyre wrote (Wed, 14 May 2025 13:48:31 +0100): >> Maybe I'm getting old and forgetful - I don't remember an issue with >> the kernel command line in Bullseye? > >See screenshot attached. Thanks Holger, that's exactly

Re: Saving some space on installation images

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:08:23AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into >installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have >a number of unused udeb packages getting included. In other words, we >could save som

Bug#1105822: installation-reports: ethernet detection sometimes fails after installation (NO-CARRIER)

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: lu...@debian.org Boot method: SD-card Image version: https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer-armhf/current/images/hd-media/SD-card-images/ Date: 2025-05-15 Machine: Olimex A20-OLinuXino-LIME2 rev C Base System Instal

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:36:02PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: Yes, changing that in the short term seem quite unwise, so I guess a rewritten deb822 version of apt-setup, post-release, is what we'll need. Has anybody talked to the apt maintainers whether they would be willing to disable the dep

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Philip Hands (2025-05-15): >> Cyril Brulebois writes: >> >> > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single >> > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different >> > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Cyril Brulebois writes: > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a bunch. It > could also break the CI (mostly run/monitored by the other

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Philip Hands (2025-05-15): > Cyril Brulebois writes: > > > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single > > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different > > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a bunch. It > > could also break t

Bug#1105804: discover: Updates & installs return the same error.

On 15/05/2025 at 03:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Peter N. (2025-05-14): Error message is: Package failed to install: Error while installing package: installed linux-image-6.1.0-34-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 We could reassign but it'd probab

Re: Early migration for adduser? (was: Accepted adduser 3.152 (source) into unstable)

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:38:27AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Thanks to everyone involved in restoring support for non-ASCII fullnames! (Discussions, code, tests, etc.) I apologize for goofing this up. Sadly it was only noticed when it had already crippled the installer. Thanks to everyon