Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1030850 [src:tzsetup] Please stop creating /etc/timezone
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1030850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Am 23.11.24 um 16:38 schrieb Holger Wansing:
Hi all,
from the originally 20 bugreports there are 12 still open more than 16 months
later.
Do we want to wait any longer?
And if so, should severity be raised?
Please also usertag those bug reports.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: Open
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #985463 [partman-auto] partman-auto: Use ext4 filesystem for /boot if boot
loader supports it
Added tag(s) pending.
--
985463: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985463
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tags -1 + pending
MR24 merged, so mark this bug as pending
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Roland Clobus, le sam. 23 nov. 2024 15:34:49 +0100, a ecrit:
> On 19/11/2024 14:17, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Cc-ing debian-accessibility at least for information.
> > Roland Clobus, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 12:31:15 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > (I've noticed e.g. 'Chinese letter - Chinese letter' being spok
Control: severity -1 serious
Dear Maintainers(s),
These bugs have been open since the release of Bookworm, and now the
development cycle for Trixie is approaching its end. Bumping the
severity of these bugs hence, as tzdata no longer creates the legacy
file.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1030850 [src:tzsetup] Please stop creating /etc/timezone
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1030850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:38:35 +0100 Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> from the originally 20 bugreports there are 12 still open more than 16
> months later.
>
> Do we want to wait any longer?
> And if so, should severity be raised?
Yeah, we have waited for the whole development cycle of Trixie
Hi all,
from the originally 20 bugreports there are 12 still open more than 16 months
later.
Do we want to wait any longer?
And if so, should severity be raised?
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
On 23/11/2024 at 15:33, Holger Wansing wrote:
Ah, indeed I forgot that part.
I should have known, that you understand that all better than I do ;-))
No worries, even I tend to forgot about my own work sometimes.
But I would not fix a regression with another regression knowingly.
By the way, y
On 23/11/2024 at 15:05, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
The new PRIORITY values defined in other recipes
Correction: the new MINIMUM and PRIORITY values.
(atomic, home, multi, small_disk) were designed to limit the swap size
to approximately 5% of disk size.
And the new MAXIMUM values limit the sw
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:05:15
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 14:32, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
> > +0100):
> >> On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>>
> >>> but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most d
Hello Samuel, lists,
On 19/11/2024 14:17, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Cc-ing debian-accessibility at least for information.
Roland Clobus, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 12:31:15 +0100, a ecrit:
The most striking recording is at step 2:6:1
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/325775/file/bootwalk_2:6:1-captured.w
On 23/11/2024 at 14:32, Holger Wansing wrote:
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
+0100):
On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close this repo
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
> > now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close this report.
>
> This bug report could
On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close this report.
This bug report could even have been closed in 2020 after the
introduction of partman-auto/cap-ram.
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:55:45
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 12:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> >> I was a bit surprised when I did a quick Debian Stable install on my new
> >> workstation (384 Gb RAM, 512 Gb ssd) and ended up with just 80 Gb usable
> >> diskspace, thanks to
On 23/11/2024 at 12:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
I was a bit surprised when I did a quick Debian Stable install on my new
workstation (384 Gb RAM, 512 Gb ssd) and ended up with just 80 Gb usable
diskspace, thanks to a 400 Gb swap partition that the Debian installer
created. I think a warning/quest
Package: partman-auto-raid
Version: 51
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i patch
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to get a preseeded Debian installation to create a md software
RAID array with superblock version 1.0. To do that, one has to issue `mdadm
--create ... --metadata=1.0 ...` at array creation time.
Your message dated Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:03:14 +0100
with message-id <20241123120314.5bc9e4c1323842aea360d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #969450 partman-auto: on a machine with 384 Gb Ram and 512
Gb SSD, creates 400 Gb swap partition
has caused the Debian Bug report #969450,
regarding partman
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 06:14:13PM -0600, Ava wrote:
> debootstrap --exclude=systemd-sysv doesn't work. The option is completely
> ignored.
Could you please describe your goal? If you want to exclude the init
system, using "--variant=minbase" should help.
Bastian
--
There's a way out of any c
21 matches
Mail list logo
