Bug#1078936: cdebconf: allow building without libglib2.0-dev

Source: cdebconf Version: 0.272 Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi, lately, glib2.0 has become difficult to cross build. As a result, there now is a desire to remove it from dependencies. cdebconf has such a dependency as it is required via the essential package base-pa

Bug#1078871: some backlog from #1076952 (installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?)

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:00:36 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote: > Pascal Hambourg wrote: > > 16 MB (~15.3 MiB) or 16 MiB (~16.8 MB) ? > > In partman, 1 MB really means 10^6 bytes, not 1 MiB (2^20 bytes). > > I think I've actually tried both and IIRC that didn't make a difference. for the MNT Reform we

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Hi arm people, could you please comment on this bug, please? Is there a need for some change? Many thanks Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Am 17. August 2024 14:22:39 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : >Shouldn't this bug be advertised in debian-...@lists.debian.org so that people >familiar with ARM platforms are aware of it ? Indeed, I intended to do so, but forgot then. Thanks -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On 17/08/2024 at 12:30, Holger Wansing wrote: Pascal, would you be able to form the proposed changes as they are currently into code for a patch or a merge request, maybe for amd64 only, for now? The details would be mostly as you stated in your first proposal, AFAICS. Currently there are no s

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Shouldn't this bug be advertised in debian-...@lists.debian.org so that people familiar with ARM platforms are aware of it ?

Bug#1078871: some backlog from #1076952 (installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?)

Copying my latest response on this subject into this bug (too) ... On Sat Aug 17, 2024 at 1:00 PM CEST, Holger Wansing wrote: > A summary from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug76952#65 > and follow-ups: >

Bug#1078871: Fwd: Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

Forward to the correct bug Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Diederik de Haas Gesendet: 17. August 2024 13:17:18 MESZ An: Pascal Hambourg , Holger Wansing , 1076...@bugs.debian.org, Philip Hands CC: "José Ángel Pastrana" , Vagrant Cascadian Betreff: Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-a

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

On Fri Aug 16, 2024 at 8:39 AM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 16/08/2024 at 00:27, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> Then I guess a 16 MiB unused partition could be added to relevant > >> recipes. Now, which are the relevant recipes ? I

Bug#1078871: some backlog from #1076952 (installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?)

A summary from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076952#65 and follow-ups: Holger Wansing wrote: > Looks like another incarnation of > > > @vagrant: > is this still (or again) an issue? --

Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices?

Package: partman-auto Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 00:47:22 +0200 From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Pascal Hambourg" , <1076...@bugs.debian.org>, "Philip Hands" , "Holger Wansing" Cc: José Ángel Pastrana , "Vagrant Cascadian" Subject: Re: Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning si

Bug#1076952: [RFD] partman-auto: Update guided partitioning size limits for current and future needs

Hi, Pascal Hambourg wrote (Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:39:18 +0200): > On 16/08/2024 at 00:27, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> Then I guess a 16 MiB unused partition could be added to relevant > >> recipes. Now, which are the relevant recipes