Hi,
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 04:31 +, mwhud...@debian.org wrote:
> Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
> to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
> important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
> to
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 04:31:14 +
Source: discover
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.2-10.1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Tea
discover_2.1.2-10.1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover_2.1.2-10.1~exp1.dsc
discover_2.1.2-10.1~exp1.debian.tar.xz
discover_2.1.2-10.1~exp1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Source: discover
Version: 2.1.2-10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wiki
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1061820 [debootstrap] debootstrap fails if target has spaces
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1061820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061820
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
On 2024-01-31 09:15, Ken Sharp wrote:
Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct
place?
the bts is the correct place but debootstrap is maintained by unpaid
volunteers like many other open source projects. So getting your patch
merged depends on somebody finding
Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
7 matches
Mail list logo
