Re: Immediate fallouts from the big linux changes, and actions

2023-12-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Bastian Blank (2023-12-24): > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > - kernel-image-* packages are now shipping /boot/vmlinuz-* (or > > /boot/vmlinux-* depending on the arch), instead of just /boot/vmlinuz > > (respectively /boot/vmlinux). > > This was even depen

Re: Immediate fallouts from the big linux changes, and actions

2023-12-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > - kernel-image-* packages are now shipping /boot/vmlinuz-* (or > /boot/vmlinux-* depending on the arch), instead of just /boot/vmlinuz > (respectively /boot/vmlinux). This was even dependent on architecture. A lot of secondary

Re: Immediate fallouts from the big linux changes, and actions

2023-12-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.12.2023 11:16, Cyril Brulebois : ... Searching for information about fuse and virtio, I finally noticed this entry, which probably explains both fuse's “going away” and ditto for some (but not all) virtio modules: * Set CONFIG_VIRTIO_FS and its dependencies to builtin, to allow building

Re: Immediate fallouts from the big linux changes, and actions

2023-12-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2023-12-24): > Feel free to reply to this thread if you spot other fallouts. Another FYI: one thing that I spotted early on (before realizing module support was entirely broken), when I first diffed the list of files available in the initramfs, building against testing's or unsta