debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Mapping buster to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 06:29:23 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20190702+deb10u13 Distribution: buster U

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u13_source.bu

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Mapping bullseye to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 05:53:21 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u5 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: mediu

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u5_source.buildi

Re: Analysis: mismatched shim* packages vs. debian-installer (opu/pu)

Cyril Brulebois (2022-09-08): > TL;DR: Everything matches what was already assessed by Steve McIntyre: > mismatched shim* packages shouldn't be an issue from a d-i perspective, > we're “just using the old shim” (sorry, buster…). Furthermore, I've just checked on two laptops (Dell G3 and Asus Vivo

Re: Analysis: mismatched shim* packages vs. debian-installer (opu/pu)

Thanks for the analysis and confirmation! :-) On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:16:16PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >This is just a summary (TL;DR at the bottom) of my findings from the >past few days, while preparing d-i for the upcoming point releases. I >thought I would share in case anyone (

Analysis: mismatched shim* packages vs. debian-installer (opu/pu)

Hi, This is just a summary (TL;DR at the bottom) of my findings from the past few days, while preparing d-i for the upcoming point releases. I thought I would share in case anyone (e.g. future self) wonders what might happen again in the future if we get unlucky again. I'll focus on bullseye but b

debian-installer_20190702+deb10u13_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:57:03 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20190702+deb10u13 Distribution: buster Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois Changes

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u5_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 22:55:12 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u5 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois Change