Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version >> 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. >> > > The version mentioned above i

Re: hello, issue with grub and os-prober

sorry i mistypoed PROBER for PROPER fixed On Sat, Feb 19, 2022, 16:58 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote: > ive helped a fella install and update debian > but then os-prober wont run, for his windows partition > we added GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false to /etc/default/grub without effect > > see termux s

Re: Bug#1005694: bullseye-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4+deb11u1

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2022-02-19): > Thanks. That looks OK to me, but will need a d-i ack as gtk+3.0 builds > a udeb; tagging and CCing accordingly. d-i in bullseye is still on gtk2 (sorry), so gtk3 should be a no-brainer. :) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 18:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2022-02-19 17:04:16 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > … > > Thanks. Assuming the above is still accurate, then this looks good > > to > > me. > > > > As the package builds a udeb, it will

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

On 2022-02-19 17:04:16 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i … > Thanks. Assuming the above is still accurate, then this looks good to > me. > > As the package builds a udeb, it will need a d-i ack; tagging and CCing > accordingly. I'm confused. May I upload or do I w

Re: Bug#1005694: bullseye-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4+deb11u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 13:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Typeahead search in the file chooser (File -> Save As... dialog) > doesn't > work on networked filesystems (NFS/CIFS) under some circumstances. > (Having Tracker installed might accidentally avoid the bug,

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

but yes its a 5 tree debian, oldstable stable testing unstable experimental On Sat, Feb 19, 2022, 18:10 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from vers

Re: Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version > 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. > The version mentioned above is correct, but the proposed changelog is not: +gnupg2 (2.2.27-2+deb

Re: Bug#1003484: bullseye-pu: package openssl/1.1.1m-0+deb11u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 00:00 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > This is an update to the latest stable update of the openssl package > provided by upstream. It contains fixes for bugs which were not > identified as security critical but still worth fixing. >