Bug#983704: Switch to fcitx5 for Simplified and Traditional Chinese desktop

Hi, Shengjing Zhu wrote (Mon, 1 Mar 2021 01:22:18 +0800): > So I think it's better to replace fcitx with fcitx5 for Bullseye, instead of > documenting in release notes that tells users to switch to Xorg. Currently we have for Chinese: Package: task-chinese-s-desktop fcitx, fcitx

rescue_1.83_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:08:52 +0100 Source: rescue Architecture: source Version: 1.83 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: rescue (1.83) unsta

Processing of rescue_1.83_source.changes

rescue_1.83_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rescue_1.83.dsc rescue_1.83.tar.xz rescue_1.83_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

partman-jfs_61_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:57:46 +0100 Source: partman-jfs Architecture: source Version: 61 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: partman-jfs (61)

partman-auto_156_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:50:17 +0100 Source: partman-auto Architecture: source Version: 156 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: partman-auto (

Processing of partman-jfs_61_source.changes

partman-jfs_61_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-jfs_61.dsc partman-jfs_61.tar.xz partman-jfs_61_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processing of partman-auto_156_source.changes

partman-auto_156_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_156.dsc partman-auto_156.tar.xz partman-auto_156_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

lvmcfg_1.55_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:35:58 +0100 Source: lvmcfg Architecture: source Version: 1.55 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: lvmcfg (1.55) unsta

Processing of lvmcfg_1.55_source.changes

lvmcfg_1.55_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lvmcfg_1.55.dsc lvmcfg_1.55.tar.xz lvmcfg_1.55_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

cdebconf_0.257_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:21:24 +0100 Source: cdebconf Architecture: source Version: 0.257 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: cdebconf (0.257)

Processing of cdebconf_0.257_source.changes

cdebconf_0.257_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.257.dsc cdebconf_0.257.tar.xz cdebconf_0.257_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

apt-setup_0.163_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:17:17 +0100 Source: apt-setup Architecture: source Version: 1:0.163 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Holger Wansing Changes: apt-setup (1:

Processing of apt-setup_0.163_source.changes

apt-setup_0.163_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-setup_0.163.dsc apt-setup_0.163.tar.xz apt-setup_0.163_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#985463: debian-installer: kernel complains about /boot partition in LVM install (ext2 filesystem being mounted at /boot supports timestamps until 2038)

On 3/18/21 9:08 PM, Charles Curley wrote: How much memory does the computer have? It is a VM with 1GB of RAM. On my FIT-PCs, using the same installer (but with firmware), I see that debian installer (d-i) goes to ext2 rather than ext4. They have 228Mi of physical memory. On my IBM R51, with

Re: 10.9 planning

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as >> already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with >> basically *just* th

Re: 10.9 planning

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as > already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with > basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if > that's our pre

Re: 10.9 planning

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:07:59PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:24:45PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >>Hi Steve, >> >>On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for >>> the point release, b

Re: 10.9 planning

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:24:45PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for >> the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for >> then. >> >> We've

Fw: Bug#985463: debian-installer: kernel complains about /boot partition in LVM install (ext2 filesystem being mounted at /boot supports timestamps until 2038)

Forgot to hit "Reply All". Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:23:53 -0600 From: Charles Curley To: Laurent Bonnaud Subject: Re: Bug#985463: debian-installer: kernel complains about /boot partition in LVM install (ext2 filesystem being mounted at /boot supports timestamps until 2

Debian-boot | Electronics Parts | KALIS

Hi Debian-boot, Good day. How are you ? Glad to hear that you’re on the market for Electronics Parts, we specialize in this field formany years, with the strength ofMLCC,IC,Transistors,Diodes and Resistors, with good quality and pretty competitive price. We will do our bestto meet any of your r

Re: 10.9 planning

Hi Steve, On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for > the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for > then. > > We've been hard at work testing and fixing things for the last couple > of w

Re: 10.9 planning

Hey folks, On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:36:47PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:33:15PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >>Hi, >> >>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >>release. >> >>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preference

Rebuilding the installer in order to get a newer kernel version

Hello maintainers of the Debian installer, Now that Debian Bullseye is in hard freeze, could you consider to update the Debian installer to use the current kernel from Bullseye? This would help in building live images using live-build [3]. The last published image of the Debian installer is from

Processed (with 5 errors): your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Tags 984816 + patch upstream Bug #984816 [busybox-static] busybox resume fails to resume with swap file after hibernation Added tag(s) upstream and patch. > Severity 984816 important Bug #984816 [busybox-static] busybox resume fails to resume wit

Bug#984816:

Tags 984816 + patch upstream Severity 984816 important This is https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12006 - which also has a patch which wasn't adopted yet (but is straight from klibc-utils, so really should get adopted). Setting severity to important, as this makes hibernation to a swapfile