Hello,
jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 12:26:44 +0200, a ecrit:
> Both loop variables are named
> "s". And 'download_release_indices' calls 'validate_suite'.
Eew. Some of the for variables were made local, but not all, now done
so, thanks for the bug tracking!
Samuel
On 19.08.20 19:01, jhcha54008 wrote:
> Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>>
>> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
>> even if a port doesn't hav
On 8/19/20 7:08 PM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> * powerpc and ppc64 :
>
> base package powerpc-utils(1.3.7-1) has a missing dependency :
> pmac-utils
> and pmac-utils(1.1.3-27+ports) is in unreleased
Both powerpc and ppc64 are perfectly installable as pmac-utils is part
of the installation CD. I may als
jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 19:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> > like is done for -backports).
>
> I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
> of an
On 8/19/20 6:55 PM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> I think this is a misunderstanding.
>
> There is no 'unreleased' suite on install cdrom
> (and I am still unconvinced that one would be of any help there).
There are individual packages from "unrelased" on the CD image when
building a CD with debian-cd beca
Le lundi 17 août à 10h 17mn 24s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>
> ... I don't quite understand why "unreleased" is supposed to be part of the
> base installation. "unreleased" is not a regular package archive and all
> packages in there are usually only added temporarily.
>
> Does
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > My current plan is (1) breathing a little, (2) getting the needed
> > > bugfixes into 10.1.
> >
> > Whoops, I'm afraid I totally neglected to followup on this so I
> > apologise this got stalled. Anyway, anything I can do to help?
>
> I've made an initial step of taking my
Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> like is done for -backports).
>
Hi again,
I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
of an 'unreleased' distribution on install cdrom ?
Regard
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>
> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
> even if a port doesn't have any package in this suite.
Hi again,
I
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 38mn 15s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
>
> Installing the base system now fails with:
>
> Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
> --debian-installer --resol
Hi,
In some circumstances, debootstrap may fail to download
'Packages' files if the option --extra-suite=unreleased is
in use (it doesn't happen with the debian-ports mirrors
but with custom mirrors). It seems that it is caused by
a forgotten 'local' declaration in the patch merged.
In the detail
11 matches
Mail list logo
