Hi Steve and Julien,
On 4/20/20 6:45 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
There are checksums for these in the archive
(dists/buster/main/installer-amd64/current/images/SHA256SUMS etc.) and
those files are themselves checksummed in the top-level buster Release
file, and that's signed by Release.gpg (or vi
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 07:36:42PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>On 20/04/2020 18:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Does /dev/tty0 show up in /proc/consoles in your setup? We might need
>> to tweak that yet...
>
>Here is a small but untested patch for rootskel's reopen-console for that.
Hmmm. Is this
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:43:57PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:03:02PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>>>On 20/04/2020 16:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm just going to test again with that change inclu
Hi Laurențiu
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Laurențiu Păncescu wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to put a preseed file on the same USB stick as the installation,
>using hd-media/boot.img.gz is easier than remastering the iso. It works, but
>there seems not to be any signed checksum file for
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Laurențiu Păncescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to put a preseed file on the same USB stick as the installation,
> using hd-media/boot.img.gz is easier than remastering the iso. It works, but
> there seems not to be any signed checksum file for these ima
Hello,
I'm trying to put a preseed file on the same USB stick as the
installation, using hd-media/boot.img.gz is easier than remastering the
iso. It works, but there seems not to be any signed checksum file for
these images and they are served only over http:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian
On 20/04/2020 18:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Does /dev/tty0 show up in /proc/consoles in your setup? We might need
to tweak that yet...
Here is a small but untested patch for rootskel's reopen-console for that.
(Thanks for the cd image, it'll probably take me until tomorrow to test
and report b
> You will also need to add support for f2fs in libparted to get it works in
> d-i (a patch is pending on upstream and in the debian package).
I wasn't aware that there is no f2fs support in libparted yet - thanks for
doing that. I hope your patch gets reviewed soon.
> Otherwises, I can format
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:03:02PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>>On 20/04/2020 16:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> I'm just going to test again with that change included, then I can
>>> push a netinst image somewhere for you to test..
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:03:02PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>On 20/04/2020 16:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm just going to test again with that change included, then I can
>> push a netinst image somewhere for you to test...
>
>I'd appreciate it. Here's another patch, this time for the armh
On 20/04/2020 16:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'm just going to test again with that change included, then I can
push a netinst image somewhere for you to test...
I'd appreciate it. Here's another patch, this time for the armhf
graphical cdrom. I checked that it boots into a graphical installer w
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:23:06PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>On 16/04/2020 15:40, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:43:36PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >
>> > ACK.
>> >
>> > Building locally to test here...
>>
>> And I have a build that looks OK by eye. Unfortunately,
12 matches
Mail list logo
