debootstrap_1.0.122_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:43:24 +0100 Source: debootstrap Architecture: source Version: 1.0.122 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois Closes: 953588 95359

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.122_source.changes

debootstrap_1.0.122_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.122.dsc debootstrap_1.0.122.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.122_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#953588: marked as done (debootstrap: fails for mirrors without translations)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953588: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.122 has caused the Debian Bug report #953588, regarding debootstrap: fails for mirrors without translations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#951709: /boot should get a bigger share of disk in default installation

Steve McIntyre (2020-03-12): > I'm torn - that's a good plan for large systems, but people on smaller > platforms (e.g. small SD on rpi) that's a lot of space. Don't people usually flash ready to use images on such devices, instead of going through d-i? Meaning acepting whatever (hopefully approp

Bug#953617: marked as done (E: Release file for ... is expired)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953617: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.122 has caused the Debian Bug report #953617, regarding E: Release file for ... is expired to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#953594: marked as done (debootstrap: not anymore possible to do stable debootstrap from snapshot.d.o)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953594: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.122 has caused the Debian Bug report #953594, regarding debootstrap: not anymore possible to do stable debootstrap from snapshot.d.o to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#953759: marked as done (debootstrap: mandatory security support breaks too many things)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953759: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.122 has caused the Debian Bug report #953759, regarding debootstrap: mandatory security support breaks too many things to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#953593: marked as done (debootstrap: --no-check-gpg and --keyring options not working with Debian stable chroots)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953593: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.122 has caused the Debian Bug report #953593, regarding debootstrap: --no-check-gpg and --keyring options not working with Debian stable chroots to be marked as done. This mea

Processed: Bug#953759 marked as pending in debootstrap

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953759 [debootstrap] debootstrap: mandatory security support breaks too many things Added tag(s) pending. -- 953759: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953759 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#953588 marked as pending in debootstrap

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953588 [debootstrap] debootstrap: fails for mirrors without translations Added tag(s) pending. -- 953588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953588 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#953617 marked as pending in debootstrap

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953617 [debootstrap] E: Release file for ... is expired Added tag(s) pending. -- 953617: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953617 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#953759: debootstrap: mandatory security support breaks too many things

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Package: debootstrap >Version: 1.0.120 >Severity: serious >Justification: RoM > >Hi, > >It seems my comments in [1] were ignored, so filing an RC bug to make >sure this is tracked at least by the BTS and britney. > > 1. https://lists

Bug#953759: debootstrap: mandatory security support breaks too many things

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.120 Severity: serious Justification: RoM Hi, It seems my comments in [1] were ignored, so filing an RC bug to make sure this is tracked at least by the BTS and britney. 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2020/03/msg00103.html The latest batch of bug repor

Re: boot-time accessibility issues

I would try something with timing and detection of a sound card in addition to the monitor. Ubuntu systems use ks.cfg files Debian uses preseed files. I saved from several years ago a ks.cfg file in braille that was offered by a website in England and believe it or not actually got ubuntu in an e

Re: boot-time accessibility issues

The idea of detecting the presence (or absence) of a blind-related device seems worth pursuing, even if there are some issues to be resolved. For example, following Jude's notion of checking for a monitor, maybe Avahi and SSH could be enabled whenever a monitor isn't found. For that matter, ena

Bug#951709: /boot should get a bigger share of disk in default installation

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:21:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 18:50 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> > > Package: debian-installer >> > > Version: 20190702+deb10u3 >> > >

Re: boot-time accessibility issues

At least if a Braille Display is connected, accessibility resources should be enabled. Also, I don’t think desktops and such should have an accessibility toggle. If it doesn’t bother the visuals, accessibility setting for the desktop GUI itself, not Orca and such, should always be set to on. Tha