Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #689528
Dear Maintainer,
any progress on this, I still have this issue.
I think the culprit might be in the `list-devices cd`, but the git /
salsa organization of debian-installer is very convoluted, and I can't
track it down where it is.
Regards,
Wi
Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #949572
One more thing, reportbug, apt-listchanges, and few other packages
that look to be using Python, all work fine, and use Python3.
I rebooted the system, and things are working fine.
Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #869897
The dmcrypt / LUKS doesn't enable discard by default on purpose, as it might
potentially be a security issue. I don't think personally it is actual
security problem, but it is just my personal opinion. You would need to
convince dmcrypt / luks m
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just installed Debian using daily amd64 netinst iso (2020-01-21 iso),
and after I selected mostly minimal amount of stuff (plus popcon,
unatannteded-upgrades, and ssh server and standard utilities),
I rebooted, and checked the python2 packages.
I
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 07:57:54PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 22:34 -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > +e2fsprogs (1.44.5-1+deb10u3) buster; urgency=medium
> > +
> > + * Fix CVE-2019-5188: potential stack underflow in e2fsck (Closes:
Hi,
Carsten Schoenert (2020-01-18):
> I've tried to rebuild the current debian-installer for buster. But this
> fails as without further modification the environment tries to get the
> udebs from the unstable archive.
d-i can definitely be built on buster, we do that regularly.
> I guess the re
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 22:34 -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> +e2fsprogs (1.44.5-1+deb10u3) buster; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Fix CVE-2019-5188: potential stack underflow in e2fsck (Closes:
> #948508)
> + * Fix use after free in e2fsck (Closes: #948517)
>
This lo
7 matches
Mail list logo
