Package: debian-installer
Version: Debian 10 buster
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
Installing from USB stick on a supermicro server.
Tested with netintall, full local install and firmware install iso. All of them
have the same behavior.
At fi
On 8/16/2019 8:34 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 15.08.2019 [17:08:39 +0200], Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Nishanth Aravamudan (2019-08-14):
>>> We are able to reproduce this issue at will in Ubuntu Bionic's
>>> installer (not identical to Debian's, but code-wise in this path the
>>> same). Whi
Hello,
Attached patch proposes new flash-kernel entry for A64 OLinuXino board
with eMMC support.
A64 OLinuXino board from Olimex has three variants with onboard eMMC:
A64-OLinuXino-1Ge16GW, A64-OLinuXino-1Ge4GW and A64-OLinuXino-2Ge8G-IND. In
addition, there are two variants without eMMC. One wit
On Aug 19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thank you for expressing your position in more detail.
> usrmerge works by moving all data from /lib into /usr/lib and then
> creating a symlink /lib -> /usr/lib. The same is done for the biarch
> or triarch directories, namely /lib32, /lib64, /libx32 and /libo32
Martin Samuelsson, le jeu. 22 août 2019 13:19:58 +0200, a ecrit:
> >[0.564101] Unpacking initramfs...
> >[0.634972] Initramfs unpacking failed: write error
>
> Since this error message appears in the log and attempting to continue after
> it will guaranteed yield in strange behavio
Bernhard Übelacker @ 2019-07-16 (Tuesday), 22:01 (+0200)
just tried to have a look at the part where steal-ctty is crashing.
Thank you Bernhard!
Maybe that situation could be detected when the initramfs was not
unpacked successfully, but has enough unpacked to attempt starting
the installer.
Martin Samuelsson, le jeu. 22 août 2019 12:58:41 +0200, a ecrit:
> The values seem to come from version 1.47 of lowmem from merely a few months
> back. How are they obtained?
As described in lowmem's README.
But AIUI the Xen case (which I indeed didn't test) requires bigger
values.
> Since they
Dear Samuel Thibault,
I was about to prepare a patch to fix #932149 by removing what I understood
to be outdated information, but then realized you've actually made recent
changes to it and must thus ask for your knowledge. Details below.
Martin Samuelsson @ 2019-07-16 (Tuesday), 17:58 (+0200
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 932149 -1
Bug #932149 [installation-reports] Buster install requires more ram than
documented
Bug 932149 cloned as bug 935407
> retitle -1 Failure to unpack initrd should be handled better
Bug #935407 [installation-reports] Buster install r
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
[full quote for KiBi's benefit]
On 2019-08-21 20:05, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2019-08-21 18:19:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
* We adopt GnuPG's upstream approach of making keyserver access
default to self-sigs-only. This means that the keyserve
10 matches
Mail list logo
