Re: Bug#877258: stretch-pu: package busybox/1:1.22.0-19+deb9u1

2019-03-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Heya, Christoph Biedl (2019-03-17): > Adam D. Barratt wrote... > > > Folks, what's the current status here? > > It's not forgotten, but now quite outdated. There are several more fixes > that should go into the stretch version of busybox. I will take care of > this in the next days. > > Cyril,

Processed: Re: Bug#924760: logfiles...

2019-03-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 grub-installer Bug #924760 [debian-installer] Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #924760 to the same values previously set Ig

Bug#924760: logfiles...

2019-03-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: reassign -1 grub-installer Brian Wengel, le dim. 17 mars 2019 23:09:13 +0100, a ecrit: > Here it is Ok. It looks like os-prober finds the sda1 EFI partition fine, and apparently "dummy" is correct for EFI platforms. But then grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install --

Bug#924760: logfiles...

2019-03-17 Thread Brian Wengel
Here it is...sorry (one of many symptoms of this last century bug system...I have to use an obscure webmail because the bug system doesn't follow good practice of NOT showing email addresses to the public. Of all people, the Debian techies should know that) On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 10:37 PM Samuel

Re: Bug#877258: stretch-pu: package busybox/1:1.22.0-19+deb9u1

2019-03-17 Thread Christoph Biedl
Adam D. Barratt wrote... > Folks, what's the current status here? It's not forgotten, but now quite outdated. There are several more fixes that should go into the stretch version of busybox. I will take care of this in the next days. Cyril, you previously mentioned the submission was too close t

Bug#924760: logfiles...

2019-03-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brian Wengel, le dim. 17 mars 2019 22:19:57 +0100, a ecrit: > The problem seem to be related to XFS filesystem (of the root partition). > I hereby attach syslog and partman from the installation. Mmm, nothing was attached? Samuel

Bug#924760: logfiles...

2019-03-17 Thread Brian Wengel
The problem seem to be related to XFS filesystem (of the root partition). I hereby attach syslog and partman from the installation.

Bug#924760: Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition

2019-03-17 Thread Brian Wengel
it seems the issue is the XFS root partition. Thought XFS was support by both Debian and GRUB2? KVM guest, qcow2 file, 50GB EFI partiton(1) 300MB ROOT: 53,4GB, ext4 OK! EFI partiton(1) 37MB ROOT: 53,5GB, ext4 OK EFI partiton(1) 37MB ROOT: 10GB ok EFI: 37MB ROOT: 10GB, XFS fail On Sun, M

Bug#924760: Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition

2019-03-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Please make sure to always hit "reply to all" so everything is recorded in the tracking system. Brian Wengel, le dim. 17 mars 2019 20:01:21 +0100, a ecrit: > Can you point me in any direction on how to get more info about the error? As documented in the installation manual, press alt-f4 to get to

Processed: Re: Bug#924760: Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition

2019-03-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #924760 [debian-installer] Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 924760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924760 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#924760: Grub is extremely picky in regards to partition

2019-03-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hello, It is hard to understand what issue exactly you had, so we can only try to guess... Brian Wengel, le dim. 17 mars 2019 01:52:17 +0100, a ecrit: > I hope the installer could be a little more flexible in regards to  EFI > partition, [...] > Why put a size limit w

release-notes for Buster installer

2019-03-17 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, while translating the release-notes into German, I noticed that the content for the installation system is still for Stretch. I have prepared a first patch, to get that updated for Buster. My proposal would be, to go for something like a "minimalistic approach" like the following: (which me

di-netboot-assistant_0.60~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports

2019-03-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 10:16:33 +0300 Source: di-netboot-assistant Binary: di-netboot-assistant Architecture: source all Version: 0.60~bpo9+1 Distribution: stretch-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System