> On Feb 13, 2019, at 6:51 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 5:47 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 16:17 -0500, Laurent Dumont wrote:
>>> I'm not sure if it's the exact same case but I had the same issue with a
>>> more recent motherboard. Debian faile
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 5:47 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 16:17 -0500, Laurent Dumont wrote:
>> I'm not sure if it's the exact same case but I had the same issue with a
>> more recent motherboard. Debian failed to detect the network card with the
>> E1000 drivers.
>>
>> I
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 16:17 -0500, Laurent Dumont wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's the exact same case but I had the same issue with a
> more recent motherboard. Debian failed to detect the network card with the
> E1000 drivers.
>
> I tried an iso with the non free repo without success.
>
> A base U
I'm not sure if it's the exact same case but I had the same issue with a
more recent motherboard. Debian failed to detect the network card with the
E1000 drivers.
I tried an iso with the non free repo without success.
A base Ubuntu iso install was able to detect and configure the network
driver.
I recently bought an intel NUC BOXNUC8i3BEH1. You can see a description of the
product at Newegg:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856102213
I’m trying to install Debian Stretch on it
debian-9.7.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
and (later)
firmware-9.6.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
I mad
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2019 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> > [Holger Wansing]
> > > Hmm, looking today, I see nb at 100% on both sites.
> > > When did you discover that?
> >
> > How strange. I still see 98% for nb on level 2 when looking at
> > https://d-i
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: PXE Network with Syslinux/UEFI
Image version: Debian 10 Alpha 5
Date: 2018-02-12
Machine: Asus Zenbook Pro UX501J
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4720HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
Memory: 16GB
Partitions:
> DateisystemTyp 1K-Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Verw% E
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:46:39 +
Source: partman-lvm
Architecture: source
Version: 127
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>
Closes:
partman-lvm_127_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_127.dsc
partman-lvm_127.tar.xz
partman-lvm_127_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:05:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922100: fixed in partman-lvm 127
has caused the Debian Bug report #922100,
regarding Buster-DI-Alpha5-netinstall: unable to remove logical volume in
guided LVM setup
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:05:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922230: fixed in partman-lvm 127
has caused the Debian Bug report #922230,
regarding partman-lvm: Cannot delete volumes created by the guided partitioning
- partman-lvm targets wrong block device
to be marked
Hi Hideki,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:16:30AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Control: reopen -1
>
>Hi Hideki,
>
>I'm afraid your fix in choose_partition/lvm/do_option is broken. It's
>causing problems for other people trying to use LVM in d-i. See
>#922100, which I've just confirmed locally.
I've
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #911036 [partman-lvm] partman-lvm: Volume group name "■" has invalid
characters, and cannot removed
Added tag(s) pending.
--
911036: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:53:49 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:06:45PM +, João Pirralha wrote:
> >Package: partman-lvm
> >Severity: important
> >
> >Dear Maintainer,
> >
> >Using buster DI alpha 5 (firmware-buster-DI-alpha5-amd64-DVD-1.iso)
I couldn't
> >delete any vol
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:06:45PM +, João Pirralha wrote:
>Package: partman-lvm
>Severity: important
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>Using buster DI alpha 5 (firmware-buster-DI-alpha5-amd64-DVD-1.iso) I couldn't
>delete any volume created by the guided partitioning (LVM + encryption) (I was
>trying to
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Using buster DI alpha 5 (firmware-buster-DI-alpha5-amd64-DVD-1.iso) I couldn't
delete any volume created by the guided partitioning (LVM + encryption) (I was
trying to remove the swap volume to have a single root volume). Looking at
virtua
Package: console-setup-linux
Version: 1.188
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2019 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Holger Wansing]
> > Hmm, looking today, I see nb at 100% on both sites.
> > When did you discover that?
>
> How strange. I still see 98% for nb on level 2 when looking at
> https://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/ > right now, while eve
This issue has been fixed in the Ubuntu package :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/1753572
Regarding debirf, my workaround for now is to replace busybox by the Ubuntu
package inside the debirf initrd.
rescue/modules/fix-busybox :
#!/bin/bash -e
latest_version=$(curl -fSsL
[Holger Wansing]
> Hmm, looking today, I see nb at 100% on both sites.
> When did you discover that?
How strange. I still see 98% for nb on level 2 when looking at
https://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/ > right now, while every
sublevel on weblate is 100%. I saw it initially this morning, when I
dis
Hi Petter,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Hi. I just noticed a strange mismatch between the translation status
> for nb on https://d-i.debian.org/l10n-stats/ > and
> https://hosted.weblate.org/languages/nb_NO/debian-installer/ >.
>
> On the first the translation is incomplete, while on the sec
21 matches
Mail list logo
