Re: Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Adam-- On Tue 2018-10-23 16:18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Sure, but that's not what I said. My distinction was between including > the gnupg update in the point release versus pushing it more urgently > via stable-updates. I never implied the updates shouldn't be released at > all.

Re: Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2018-10-23 20:00:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > From discussions elsewhere, I understand that the "raw" upstream > enigmail - i.e. installed via upstream's addons service - is actually > already compatible with the new Thunderbird version, and the problem > only affects the Debian packag

#911705 [l10n|gu] debian-installer: fonts broken for Gujarati

2018-10-23 Thread Holger Wansing
I filed this bugreport today, but forgot to add debian-boot as X-Debbugs-CC, so I'm resending to debian-boot here a copy of the bug text: Please keep debian-boot in CC Holger Wansing wrote: > Package: fonts-freefont-udeb > Severity: normal > > > I just noticed that Gujarati is no longer unusa

Re: Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 10:35 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > The fact that the upstream-supported version of enigmail that works > with the upcoming stretch version of thunderbird depends on these > fixes is, as you say, another reason to suggest inclusion in debian > stretch. >From discussions

Re: Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2018-10-23 15:35, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases! I just wanted to clarify a few points here. On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for stable-updates a

Re: Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases! I just wanted to clarify a few points here. On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for > stable-updates any more than it qualifies for stable-security.

choose-mirror_2.95_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2018-10-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:15:45 +0200 Source: choose-mirror Binary: choose-mirror choose-mirror-bin Architecture: source Version: 2.95 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By

Processing of choose-mirror_2.95_source.changes

2018-10-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
choose-mirror_2.95_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_2.95.dsc choose-mirror_2.95.tar.xz choose-mirror_2.95_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#911664: debian-installer: add input-modules to mips/mipsel/mips64el's netboot

2018-10-23 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: debian-installer Please add input-modules to mips/mipsel/mips64el's netboot image. When we install on some machine with usb keyboard only, we cannot use them at all. -- YunQiang Su