Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 11:44:57 +0900
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.103
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-
debootstrap_1.0.103_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.103.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.103.tar.gz
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.103_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.103_all.deb
debootstrap_1.0.103_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (ru
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:18:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901808: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.103
has caused the Debian Bug report #901808,
regarding debootstrap: --merged-usr is silently ignored on "blacklisted" suites
like stretch
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:18:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#900925: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.103
has caused the Debian Bug report #900925,
regarding debootstrap may fail because of arch-test in stretch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #900925 [debootstrap] debootstrap may fail because of arch-test in stretch
Added tag(s) pending.
--
900925: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #900925 [debootstrap] debootstrap may fail because of arch-test in stretch
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #900925 to the same tags previously set
--
900925: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900925
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #902020 [debian-installer] debian-installer: netboot.tar.gz archives should
have identical structure, include version.info file
Added tag(s) pending.
--
902020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Cyril,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andreas B. Mundt (2018-06-22):
> > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I worked out a minimal
> > patch that fixes the issue.
>
> From a quick look, that should be fine; feel free to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 806984 + ftbfs
Bug #806984 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: ftbfs because d-i needs
network to build…
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
806984: https://bugs.debian.o
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 17:30:43 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Upgrading to cryptsetup ≥2:2.0.3-2 from d-i might yield an unbootable system
> if the initramfs image is updated at finish-install stage.
This was not the only thing need to fix the cryptsetup initramfs
integration from d-i, by the way
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> tom (2018-06-17):
> >
> > I installed '/' on /dev/sdc. The installer defaulted to also install
> > grub there. I accepted. The system was not bootable.
>
> Which Debian version and d-i version did
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.94
Severity: important
Hi there,
Upgrading to cryptsetup ≥2:2.0.3-2 from d-i might yield an unbootable system
if the initramfs image is updated at finish-install stage.
That's because the cryptroot hook script is now relying on pseudo-filesystems
proc(5) (for /
Hi Andreas,
Andreas B. Mundt (2018-06-22):
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I worked out a minimal
> patch that fixes the issue.
From a quick look, that should be fine; feel free to push (with a
changelog entry), thanks!
> However, it would be interesting to know why armhf uses
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #902020 [debian-installer] debian-installer: netboot.tar.gz archives should
have identical structure, include version.info file
Added tag(s) patch.
--
902020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Cyril,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:48:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: d-i
>
> (No need for this tag for d-i and debs/udebs maintained by debian-boot@;
> we tend to use it for pieces not directly linked to us.)
Ah, thanks for info and f
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - help wontfix
Bug #611250 [netcfg] please support network bonding
Removed tag(s) wontfix and help.
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #611250 [netcfg] please support network bonding
Added tag(s) patch.
--
611250: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611250
D
Control: tag -1 - help wontfix
Control: tag -1 + patch
On 05/02/2018 07:09 PM, Michal Humpula wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> so it's 2018 and I've already booted quite a few machines with this patch, so
> it comes the time to ask, whether it could be included in netcfg now?
>
> As posted above, if the
17 matches
Mail list logo
