Bug#901332: d-i: Offer to shut down / power off instead of reboot at the end

2018-06-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 17:23 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: normal > > d-i always insists on rebooting at the end. This is made worse > by it telling the user to change boot media, which, for virtual > machines, means reconfiguring the VM. virt-manager (or ma

Bug#871835: systemd-setup-machine-id leaving mount behind? (was "Bug#871835: Call for help: review patches for debootstrap")

2018-06-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Antonio sorry for the late reply... Am 13.06.2018 um 01:20 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 22.04.2018 um 15:09 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > >> # findmnt | grep machine-id >> ├─/root/patched2/etc/machine-id >> /dev/mapper/lemur--vg-root[/root/patched2/run/machine-id] ext4

Bug#871835: systemd-setup-machine-id leaving mount behind? (was "Bug#871835: Call for help: review patches for debootstrap")

2018-06-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Am 22.04.2018 um 15:09 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > # findmnt | grep machine-id > ├─/root/patched2/etc/machine-id > /dev/mapper/lemur--vg-root[/root/patched2/run/machine-id] ext4 > ro,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered > > This explains the crash in mko

Bug#694965: netcfg: Allow setup of pointopoint routes to reach gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Igor Scheller
Oh, and here is the patch File ;) On 12.06.2018 13:49, Igor Scheller wrote: > Hi, > i created a merge request [1] that allows to preseed pointopoint > connections so anyone can use a preseed file or boot parameters to > define a pointopoint connection. > -> If a pointopoint connection is preseeded

Bug#829134: debootstrap: Changes needed to support unprivileged userns debootstrap

2018-06-12 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:39:57 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:12:16 -0700 Ben Longbons wrote: > > Now that the kernel supports user_namespaces(7), it should be possible to > > debootstrap in them. Some small changes are needed. > > > > Configuration needed: > > * Kerne

Bug#782287: hw-detect: install open-vm-tools in d-i

2018-06-12 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi again, things have changed - thanks VMware - and I'd be happy to support whatever is needed to make d-i install open-vm-tools when being run in a VMware environment. Regarding the suggested extra binary I'm wondering if dmidecode wouldn't be appropriate to handle the detection of a virtualized

Re: [l10n-sync] Updating sync script on git migration

2018-06-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Holger Wansing (2018-06-12): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I think it would make sense to have you in the d-i gid, so that you can > > access dillon, and re-enable crontab entries, maybe subscribing to cron > > mails? Of course I could re-enable those crontab entries myself but I > > won't be

Re: [l10n-sync] Updating sync script on git migration

2018-06-12 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I think it would make sense to have you in the d-i gid, so that you can > access dillon, and re-enable crontab entries, maybe subscribing to cron > mails? Of course I could re-enable those crontab entries myself but I > won't be able to fix any possible fallouts in th

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-12): > Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on > getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted. > > For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, Debcamp > starts on July 21st and then Debconf on the 28

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
El 12 de junio de 2018 13:44:52 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió: >On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> [Cc += debian-kernel] >> >> On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >>> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >[...] >> We're past any of the above by now

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:44:52PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on >getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted. > >For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 15:19:25 +0200, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault writes: > > > It's a matter of someone fixing the code. It seems Igor Scheller is > > happy to work on it, he just needs a way forward, not being only told > > that what is currently there is nonsense. > > Well, using f

Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Bjørn Mork
Samuel Thibault writes: > It's a matter of someone fixing the code. It seems Igor Scheller is > happy to work on it, he just needs a way forward, not being only told > that what is currently there is nonsense. Well, using fe80::1 as default gateway would not be a problem if it weren't for the e

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 14:12:28 +0200, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault writes: > > Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit: > >> But this will: > >> > >> frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1 > > > > So this is a route, which can be checked for. > > No, it is

Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Bjørn Mork
Samuel Thibault writes: > Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit: >> But this will: >> >> frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1 > > So this is a route, which can be checked for. No, it is a route you can safely add. Checking for it is no point. It does not hav

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit: > But this will: > > frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1 So this is a route, which can be checked for. > > which is the point of the test AIUI. > > The test is pointless. There is absolutely no requirement that the > ga

Bug#694965: netcfg: Allow setup of pointopoint routes to reach gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Igor Scheller
Hi, i created a merge request [1] that allows to preseed pointopoint connections so anyone can use a preseed file or boot parameters to define a pointopoint connection. -> If a pointopoint connection is preseeded it would be used. Improvements / thoughts welcome! Greets Igor Scheller [1] https:

Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Bjørn Mork
Samuel Thibault writes: > Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 10:52:30 +0200, a ecrit: >> Huh? What is this? There is no "gateway must be in subnet" requirement >> in IPv6. The gateway must only be reachable, which means that you must >> be able to resolve the L2 address using ND. > > Before that

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Cc += debian-kernel] On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] We're past any of the above by now, and while looking through the to-do list for the final jessie point release, I not

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
-kernel: any chance of a yes/no ASAP, please? On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Cc += debian-kernel] On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a > big >  as

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Igor Scheller, le mar. 12 juin 2018 11:28:58 +0200, a ecrit: > Imho it could be a better option to just configure the interface and > test if something is reachable? "something" is the problem. We do test for reachability of the mirror anyway. But again, checking that there actually is a route do

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 10:52:30 +0200, a ecrit: > Huh? What is this? There is no "gateway must be in subnet" requirement > in IPv6. The gateway must only be reachable, which means that you must > be able to resolve the L2 address using ND. Before that, you need a route, which is the p

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Igor Scheller
On 12.06.2018 10:52, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Igor Scheller writes: > > From 6bff2dee11a8d5493f87ec541f854e3897ef6a9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Igor Scheller >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 23:52:37 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] Added support for fe80 addresses as gateway >> >> --- >> netcfg-common.c

Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway

2018-06-12 Thread Bjørn Mork
Igor Scheller writes: From 6bff2dee11a8d5493f87ec541f854e3897ef6a9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Igor Scheller > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 23:52:37 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Added support for fe80 addresses as gateway > > --- > netcfg-common.c | 5 - > static.c