Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:57:52 +0900
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.99
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2018 02:36:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#898738: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #898738,
regarding debootstrap fails when specifying components
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
debootstrap_1.0.99_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.99.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.99.tar.gz
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.99_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.99_all.deb
debootstrap_1.0.99_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 12:47, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> I think an appropriate fix would be for debuerreotype to simply
> unilaterally remove "/run/mount/utab" (and then "/run/mount" if it's
empty)
> to re-achieve reproducibility across different debootstrap versions (given
> that the new version does
On Tue, 15 May 2018 at 14:50, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> Given how this got mangled, I've attached a plain-text version of the diff
> here.
I think an appropriate fix would be for debuerreotype to simply
unilaterally remove "/run/mount/utab" (and then "/run/mount" if it's empty)
to re-achieve reproduc
Paul Gevers (2018-05-16):
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 16-05-18 13:33, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > 2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
> >> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
> >> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
> >> isn't blocking
Hi Luca,
On 16-05-18 13:33, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
>> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
>> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
>> isn't blocking migration anymore².
>
> This is due to #
On Wed, 16 May 2018 13:34:44 +0200
Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > Simply initialize "ext" prevents this failure, could you check attached
> > patch, please?
>
> I applied to 1.0.98 package in unstable, and it fixes the problem for me.
Good :) Then, let's add test for it as attached.
>From fe8dc5
Hi Hideki,
2018-05-16 2:03 GMT+02:00 Hideki Yamane :
>> See attached patch, against the offending commit. It doesn't apply to
>> master as-is because of the by-hash addition.
>
> Simply initialize "ext" prevents this failure, could you check attached
> patch, please?
I applied to 1.0.98 package
Hi Paul,
2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
> isn't blocking migration anymore².
This is due to #898738.
--
Cheers,
Luca
On 2018-05-16 09:55, Hideki Yamane wrote:
While I had fixed some bug reports and added some bugs ;) in
debootstrap,
I want to reduce regressions by using Merge Request feature of GitLab.
- Go "Repository Settings" page
→ set master branch as "Allowed to push" to "no one"
- Then, all push
Hi all,
On 15-05-18 15:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tl;dr: debootstrap/1.0.98 breaks debomatic/0.23-1 autopkgtest in testing
> see: https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debomatic/testing/amd64/
The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
without the new debootstrap for reasons u
Hi,
While I had fixed some bug reports and added some bugs ;) in debootstrap,
I want to reduce regressions by using Merge Request feature of GitLab.
- Go "Repository Settings" page
→ set master branch as "Allowed to push" to "no one"
- Then, all pushes are not allowed directly, it is trea
13 matches
Mail list logo
