Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 690210 - pending
Bug #690210 [debootstrap] debootstrap: please add support for debian-ports
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690210: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
tag 690210 - pending
thanks
On 4/20/18 12:16 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> control: tags -1 +pending
>
> It's not "pending" because it's not yet pushed to the official git
> repository. I don't know if you just forgot to push or if willingly kept
> it o
Hideki,
On 4/24/18 3:29 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 09:40:54 +1000
>> David Margerison wrote:
"$@" is extracted as '' and wget tries to fetch it and fails,
then returns 1.
>>>
>>> Regarding the proposed fix, in general
tag 886016 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On 2/21/18 2:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 02/15/2018 11:31 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 2018-01-01 17:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> following patch looks at the Acquire-By-Hash field in (In)Release to get
>>> Packages from the by-hash directory if available a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 886016 + pending
Bug #886016 [debootstrap] debootstrap: add support for Acquire-By-Hash for
downloading indices
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
886016: https://bugs.debia
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Heya,
>
> Holger Wansing (2018-05-13):
> > However, there is much more work to do here, "svn" and "alioth" is
> > often mentioned in the manual.
>
> That's fair. But maybe we should track this as a different RC bug (just
> to make extra sure t
Heya,
Holger Wansing (2018-05-13):
> However, there is much more work to do here, "svn" and "alioth" is
> often mentioned in the manual.
That's fair. But maybe we should track this as a different RC bug (just
to make extra sure this doesn't go unnoticed/unfixed until the release),
which could be
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing (2018-05-10):
> > Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> > > installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> > > 2018-05-31
> > >
> > > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > > 897529: installation-guide: FTBFS
> >
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:51 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Sandro Tosi (2018-05-13):
> > > Hey debian-boot@ ! do you have any thoughts on this suggestions? do you
> > > feel the current rate of bug reports is impacted by the iss
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 05:14:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 06:05:53PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
>>Can't we just go for that instead, which would have the benefit of
>>matching the source package name?
>> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:51 AM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
> Sandro Tosi (2018-05-13):
> > Hey debian-boot@ ! do you have any thoughts on this suggestions? do you
> > feel the current rate of bug reports is impacted by the issue Eduard
> > reported? what would you like to see here? thanks!
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 06:05:53PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hey,
>
>Looking at names…
>
>Steve McIntyre (2018-05-09):
>> Yup. In fact, at this point I declare the conversion to be as done as
>> it's going to be. I've just imported these test repos into the
>> installer-team area:
>>
>> htt
Hi,
Holger Wansing (2018-05-10):
> Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> > installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> > 2018-05-31
> >
> > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > 897529: installation-guide: FTBFS
>
> This is because of the "ID xxx-yyy already def
Hey,
Looking at names…
Steve McIntyre (2018-05-09):
> Yup. In fact, at this point I declare the conversion to be as done as
> it's going to be. I've just imported these test repos into the
> installer-team area:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i
I guess this is fair, even if peo
Hi,
Sandro Tosi (2018-05-13):
> Hey debian-boot@ ! do you have any thoughts on this suggestions? do you
> feel the current rate of bug reports is impacted by the issue Eduard
> reported? what would you like to see here? thanks!
Why isn't “Joe user” checking what the installation guide recommends
> I tried to report a bug in the debian installer with reportbug. Doing
> this with "Joe user attitude", not looking for the actual virtual
> package name and other resources. I tried:
> reportbug install
> reportbug installer
> reportbug (and then selecting other and looking for debian-installer
16 matches
Mail list logo
