Re: APT Date verification

2018-02-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:05:50PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release > > file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implications > > for installing on devic

Re: APT Date verification

2018-02-08 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Hey guys, > > APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release > file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implications > for installing on devices with an inaccurate clock, as they might > now fail. > > There are two p

Re: APT Date verification

2018-02-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:25:16PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > It's a bit unclear if this only affects validation of the Date field, > > or also turns off Validation of the Valid-Until field (as a generic "turn > > off all d

Bug#889904: /etc/flash-kernel/dtbs versioning

2018-02-08 Thread Joey Hess
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.90 Severity: normal There's a good chance that the devicetree file for one version of the kernel will not work with another version. I suspect this was the case, and confirmed it today when my cubietruck failed to boot with mismatched versions. So, it would be goo

Re: APT Date verification

2018-02-08 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > It's a bit unclear if this only affects validation of the Date field, > or also turns off Validation of the Valid-Until field (as a generic "turn > off all date-related checks" option). Opinions on that? there definitly should

APT Date verification

2018-02-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hey guys, APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implications for installing on devices with an inaccurate clock, as they might now fail. There are two primary workarounds: * Set Acquire::Check-Date to false * Set c

Processed: forcibly merging 878483 889897

2018-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 878483 889897 Bug #878483 [task-gnome-desktop] task-gnome-desktop: Drop extra Recommends Bug #878483 [task-gnome-desktop] task-gnome-desktop: Drop extra Recommends Marked as found in versions tasksel/3.42. Bug #889897 [task-gnome-deskto

Processed (with 1 error): merging 889897 878483

2018-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 889897 878483 Bug #889897 [task-gnome-desktop] Please drop synaptic from Recommends Unable to merge bugs because: blocks of #878483 is '883440' not '' Failed to merge 889897: Did not alter merged bugs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#889717: Not booting to grub directly

2018-02-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:24:32PM +0530, Akash mazumder wrote: ... > *What was the outcome of this action? > Installer installs normally, but when I boot up it directly logs me >into Win10. I have manually select F9 and choose my boot option >[something like UEFI Operating system(Debian)

Bug#889897: Please drop synaptic from Recommends

2018-02-08 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Package: task-gnome-desktop Version: 3.42 Severity: normal Hi, For Buster, I'm wondering if synaptic shouldn't be dropped from the task-gnome-desktop Recommends. synaptic doesn't work properly with wayland and the default session will be running wayland at the time of the release. In addition, G

Debian-installer - sublevel3 - Time zones - Dushanbe - Tajikistan

2018-02-08 Thread victor.ibragimov
Hi Debian-i18n team! It looks like that in debian-installer "Dushanbe" (capital city of Tajikistan) is not listed in the list for time zone selection. Could you please, check if it is possible to include Dushanbe into the list. --- English source: Dushanbe Tajik translation: Душанбе ---

RE: New Language Process for Tajik: missing status update?

2018-02-08 Thread victor.ibragimov
Dear Christian and Holger, Please, keep me informed about the release of new ISO image with updated Tajik translation, so I save my Internet traffic. Kind regards, Victor -Original Message- From: Christian Perrier [mailto:bubu...@debian.org] Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 2:56 PM To:

Re: New Language Process for Tajik: missing status update?

2018-02-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Le 08/02/2018 à 10:50, Holger Wansing a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2018 schrieb victor.ibragi...@gmail.com: Hi Debian-i18n team! Sublevel3 is now 100% translated into Tajik language! So now all 5 files should be 100% translated. Yeah. :-) In the total - for all 5 sublevel files - a

Re: RE: New Language Process for Tajik: missing status update?

2018-02-08 Thread Holger Wansing
Am Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2018 schrieb victor.ibragi...@gmail.com: > Hi Debian-i18n team! > > Sublevel3 is now 100% translated into Tajik language! So now all 5 files > should be 100% translated. Yeah. :-) > In the total - for all 5 sublevel files - about 19 859 words have been > translated i

RE: New Language Process for Tajik: missing status update?

2018-02-08 Thread victor.ibragimov
Hi Debian-i18n team! Sublevel3 is now 100% translated into Tajik language! So now all 5 files should be 100% translated. -- In the total - for all 5 sublevel files - about 19 859 words have been translated into Tajik language. I am now waiting for the updated ISO image to make live tests and app