Since the time of writing sddm get a new release in debian and some
dependencies are improved - second there are now some native debian sddm
theme packages.
So task-lxqt-desktop should be changed that way:
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index ef6a0a48..0d1faab2 100644
> --- a/de
For the benefit of the s390 porters (whom I should have Cc'd on this
from the very start):
Unless I'm doing something terribly wrong, it appears that stretch (and
later) don't install on the hercules s390 emulator anymore. Anyone have
any clue what's wrong?
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:49:48PM +020
Tests with the provided images:
* debian-9.0+HACK-amd64-NETINST-1-with-provides.iso does the trick
* tasksel show both LXDE and LXQt so this point is fixed
* installation of both LXDE and LXQt went well, LXQt perfect, LXDE
picked up lxqt-policykit somehow, possible not related to tasksel.
Should be
Michael Biebl (2017-10-26):
> The debconf templates are of course translated. What I meant is that I
> don't ship /usr/share/locale in the eject udeb.
I think I misread gettext as debconf when I received your mail, and I
really should have read it more thoroughly before replying.
> Or is it impo
Am 26.10.2017 um 16:59 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
>> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the
>> gettext translations.
>
> Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the
> i18n + l10n part working is importa
Cyril Brulebois (2017-10-26):
> Following the bump from alpha1 to alpha2, the situation improved quite a
> bit for the d-i daily builds (see #879662 for context). I've triggered a
> manual build for all archs, and if my copying/pasting is correct, the
> results are as follows:
>
> armel:a
Hi KiBi!
Cyril Brulebois:
> intrigeri (2017-10-25):
>> I'm working on the last blockers towards starting the experiment I've
>> proposed on debian-devel@ 2.5 months ago, i.e. enabling AppArmor by
>> default for a while in testing/sid.
> Does it make sense to have it installed everywhere, includi
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the
> gettext translations.
Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the
i18n + l10n part working is important.
> But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in
Hi'ntrigeri,
intrigeri (2017-10-25):
> I'm working on the last blockers towards starting the experiment I've
> proposed on debian-devel@ 2.5 months ago, i.e. enabling AppArmor by
> default for a while in testing/sid.
Does it make sense to have it installed everywhere, including in
chroots, conta
Hi Petr,
Petr Cech (2017-10-25):
> apt 1.6~alpha removed binary package apt-transport-https and therefor
> debootstrap with a https URL fails with dependency error:
>
> I: Checking component main on https://deb.debian.org/debian...
> E: Couldn't find these debs: apt-transport-https
>
> Followin
FYI, a quick follow-up:
Cyril Brulebois (2017-10-26):
> On further investigation, it seems IPv6 addresses changed for both
> machines. I've just modified dillon's configuration accordingly to
> account for the native IPv6 addresses, and next builds should show
> up again.
It seems IPv6 assignmen
lickey).
di-autobuild_daily-kfreebsd-amd64-20171024-:Permission denied
(publickey).
di-autobuild_daily-kfreebsd-amd64-20171026-0857:Permission denied
(publickey).
kibi@fischer:/home/d-i/di/logs$ grep Permission\ denied.'*'publickey
*201710*
di-autobuild_daily-kfreebsd-i386
Package: apt
Version: 1.6~alpha2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: FTBFS
[ X-D-Cc: debian-boot@, debian-mips@, debian-powerpc@ ]
Hi,
Following the bump from alpha1 to alpha2, the situation improved quite a
bit for the d-i daily builds (see #879662 for context). I've triggered a
manual b
13 matches
Mail list logo
