On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Holger Wansing
wrote:
> Hi Lior and list,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > For the installer itself, I would not start before the release of
> Stretch,
> > > it's too late for that now.
> > > My first target would be the installer for buster.
> >
> > I'm adding
Package: di-netboot-assistant
Version: 0.49
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete con
I am affected by this as well.
Googling shows shows people experimenting with workarounds - creating an
additional unencrypted /boot partition independent of the unencrypted EFI
partition.
This is overly complicated when the subsequent install workflow already
does the correct thing - in creating
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi Lior and list,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > For the installer itself, I would not start before the release of Stretch,
> > > it's too late for that now.
> > > My first target would be the installer for buster.
> >
> > I'm adding Lior in copy of this small sub
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #868357 [installation-guide] installation-guide: get rid of "not up to date
for " warnings
Added tag(s) pending.
--
868357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + pending
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Holger Wansing, on mar. 26 sept. 2017 20:51:34 +0200, wrote:
> > Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > Those warnings are there since Woody or Sarge, and I think they are no
> > > longer true.
> > > We should remove them.
> >
> > A patch is attached.
>
Holger Wansing, on mar. 26 sept. 2017 20:51:34 +0200, wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Those warnings are there since Woody or Sarge, and I think they are no
> > longer true.
> > We should remove them.
>
> A patch is attached.
> It removes the warnings for all archs except hurd and kfreebsd var
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Package: installation-guide
> Severity: wishlist
>
> On (for example)
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.arm64/index.html
> the installation guide has warning messages like
>
> "Although this installation guide for amd64 is mostly up-to-date,
> we plan to make
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:04:54 +0200
with message-id <1506448...@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
and subject line Re: busybox: CVE-2016-6301: NTP server denial of service flaw
has caused the Debian Bug report #833442,
regarding busybox: CVE-2016-6301: NTP server denial of service flaw
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 833442 1:1.27.2-1
Bug #833442 [src:busybox] busybox: CVE-2016-6301: NTP server denial of service
flaw
Marked as fixed in versions busybox/1:1.27.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
833442:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.63
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effecti
Hi Vagrant,
thanks for your reply!
I have now come up with a revised script taking your comments into
consideration.
Am 25.09.2017 um 21:22 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
> On 2017-09-25, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> The SolidRun CuBox has very good support in Mainline Linux.
>> Thus it is a great candidat
12 matches
Mail list logo
