On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:54:44PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 23/08/17 19:22, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> While it is good that we use material from official sources, Debian is
> >> independent of any state and may not n
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 03:22 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Drew, such conversion from xsfbs to dh should really be accompanied
> by
> a thorough debdiff check:
>
> $ debdiff --controlfiles=ALL ../libxcursor*changes
>
> which makes the breakage obvious:
> > Shlibs files of package libxcursor
.oO( Third time is the charm? )
Cyril Brulebois (2017-08-24):
> Michael Biebl (2017-08-24):
> > Am 23.08.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> >
> > > My NMU FTBFSes on mips64el:
> > >
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mips64el&ver=234-2.1&stamp=1503523165&
Control: reassign -1 libxcursor1 1:1.1.14-2
Control: retitle -1 libxcursor1: broken shlibs for the udeb
Control: tag -1 patch
(Minor nitpick.)
Jeremy Bicha (2017-08-23):
> When libxcursor was converted to dh's rules, the line defining PACKAGE
> was accidentally removed.
>
> So this line:
> dh_m
Package: libxcursor1-udeb
Version: 1:1.1.14-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
When libxcursor was converted to dh's rules, the line defining PACKAGE
was accidentally removed.
So this line:
dh_makeshlibs -V "libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2)" --add-udeb=$(PACKAGE)-udeb
gets inte
Michael Biebl (2017-08-24):
> Am 23.08.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>
> > My NMU FTBFSes on mips64el:
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mips64el&ver=234-2.1&stamp=1503523165&raw=0
> >
> > James Cowgill mentioned this gcc bug report:
> > https://bu
Am 23.08.2017 um 23:57 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> My NMU FTBFSes on mips64el:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mips64el&ver=234-2.1&stamp=1503523165&raw=0
>
> James Cowgill mentioned this gcc bug report:
> https://bugs.debian.org/871514
>
> so I think I might
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2017-08-23):
> Michael Biebl (2017-08-23):
> > Am 23.08.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > > Would you be OK with a minimal NMU to fix the missing file? This issue has
> > > been blocking the D-I Buster Alpha 1 release for weeks already (even if it
> > > hadn't been
Le Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:54:44PM +0200, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
> If that means a user in Kosovo is more likely to configure their system
> correctly, then it is a good technical solution, similar to what I
> described (leaving out the country codes for such regions and helping
> them choose a
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Michael Biebl (2017-08-23):
> Am 23.08.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > Would you be OK with a minimal NMU to fix the missing file? This issue has
> > been blocking the D-I Buster Alpha 1 release for weeks already (even if it
> > hadn't been diagnosed and r
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> While it is good that we use material from official sources, Debian is
> independent of any state and may not need to feel constrained by such lists/
> standards in the same way that a commercial software vendor might be.
On the othe
On 23/08/17 19:22, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> While it is good that we use material from official sources, Debian is
>> independent of any state and may not need to feel constrained by such lists/
>> standards in the same way that a
Hi KiBi
Am 23.08.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Would you be OK with a minimal NMU to fix the missing file? This issue has
> been blocking the D-I Buster Alpha 1 release for weeks already (even if it
> hadn't been diagnosed and reported against udev-udeb until recently), and
> I'd be hap
I am trying to configure a preseed image using RAID + encryption. I
originally wanted to do this without LVM, however it does not seem (at
least with encryption) that this is possible. I simply want to know if
this is even possible via preseed -- that is, to have both RAID and
encryption partit
Le 23/08/2017 à 10:12, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Ansgar Burchardt (2017-08-23):
>> Emmanuel Kasper writes:
>>> The default base system installed by debootstrap includes all packages
>>> with Pritority essential and
>>> important, but this was not yet documented.
>>
>> There is no "esse
Hi Matthew,
For these kinds of questions, please ask on the debian-user mailinglist.
The -boot list is meant for development of the installer, not for
support with the full installation images (which contain more than just
the installer). In contrast, the -user list is meant for user support.
Reg
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:23:52AM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> many thanks for the patch. I will apply it to the d-i repository,
> but I would prefer to wait until we have have kernel 4.13 in
> unstable and can change the d-i kernel ABI setting accordingly.
Makes total sense. I onl
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 10:38 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> > > I added run-init to busybox just now, but I don't see -n option
>> > > in
>> > > klibc-2.0.4 source. Can you point me to the source code with -n?
>> >
>> > It's not upstream yet,
Hi,
I am tring to install debian 9 using the offline DVDS, which is the most
convenient for me. The menu comes up but none of the options work. It
just pauses for a few seconds with none of the keys working and then
comes back to life.
When I go into the command prompt through the help menu (the o
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-08-19):
> Am 19.08.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>
> > A timely fix would be appreciated, the breakage(s) in the graphical
> > installer prevented us from releasing debian-installer over the past few
> > weeks, and it would be great not to wait too long before we
Ansgar Burchardt (2017-08-23):
> Emmanuel Kasper writes:
> > The default base system installed by debootstrap includes all packages
> > with Pritority essential and
> > important, but this was not yet documented.
>
> There is no "essential" priority. There is only "required" (and its
>
Emmanuel Kasper writes:
> The default base system installed by debootstrap includes all packages
> with Pritority essential and
> important, but this was not yet documented.
There is no "essential" priority. There is only "required" (and its
dependencies).
Ansgar
22 matches
Mail list logo
