Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 664707 !
Bug #664707 [phlipple] phlipple: Segmentation fault on startup
Bug #653675 [phlipple] phlipple: Segmentation fault on startup
Changed Bug submitter to 'Ben Finney ' from 'Ben Finney
'.
> submitter 462809 !
Bug #462809 [partman-
Hello,
Aurelien Jarno (2017-08-19):
> glibc/2.24-14 has been blocked for long in unstable due to the linux
> package not migrating. Unfortunately it failed to migrate at the same
> time due to bug#871275, which has nothing to glibc besides the fact that
> "libc-bin" appears in the log.
>
> In sh
Hi,
glibc/2.24-14 has been blocked for long in unstable due to the linux
package not migrating. Unfortunately it failed to migrate at the same
time due to bug#871275, which has nothing to glibc besides the fact that
"libc-bin" appears in the log.
In short, after waiting for more than 2 weeks, it
Hi there,
Now it is time to raise a different problem: Hardware Variants.
Right now we have the Clearfog Pro, and the Clearfog Base.
The future might bring also introduce other CPU variants different from
Armada-388 (but thats pure speculation).
The Device-Tree was actually renamed in mainline wi
Hi again everybody,
I finally got around to trying this out myself using a freshly
debootstrapped stretch, and 2017.07-rc3 u-boot and these are my findings
with the early posted db entry:
The device-tree gets copied as expected
boot.scr gets generated
root= argument is not added to cmdline: That
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> (Again, please keep debian-boot@ in copy.)
>
> Raphael Hertzog (2017-08-19):
>> > I've only quickly glanced at the contents of both packages, and
>> > debdiff mentions no obvious issues (file lists are the
Am 19.08.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> A timely fix would be appreciated, the breakage(s) in the graphical
> installer prevented us from releasing debian-installer over the past few
> weeks, and it would be great not to wait too long before we're able to do
> so, esp. with linux 4.12.6-
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
(Again, please keep debian-boot@ in copy.)
Raphael Hertzog (2017-08-19):
> > I've only quickly glanced at the contents of both packages, and
> > debdiff mentions no obvious issues (file lists are the same).
>
> I believe this is precisely the problem. The new udev-ude
Am 19.08.2017 um 10:14 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> I wonder if it would be possible to have autopkgtest tests covering
> udev-udeb...
We'd be happy to ship such an autopkgtest. Help in that regard would be
much appreciated.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
Am 19.08.2017 um 10:19 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 19.08.2017 um 04:59 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>>
>> I haven't looked into the changelog and actual changes (yet), but I'd be
>> happy to get some input (no pun intended) from systemd maintainers.
>>
>
> Maybe this is related:
> https://github.com/s
I've been searching for more information about this bug, and I've found
a bug report at RedHat that probably is connected to this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227522 . This had led me to
another bug report, this time, in KDE:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350688 .
So it
Am 19.08.2017 um 04:59 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
>
> I haven't looked into the changelog and actual changes (yet), but I'd be
> happy to get some input (no pun intended) from systemd maintainers.
>
Maybe this is related:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/43af16c99c800afdfc4b6913ea7596aadd
Processing control commands:
> found -1 3.35
Bug #872601 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: Patch for Raspberry Pi 2 support
Marked as found in versions flash-kernel/3.35.
> notfound -1 3.79
Bug #872601 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: Patch for Raspberry Pi 2 support
Ignoring request to alter found version
Control: found -1 3.35
Control: notfound -1 3.79
Control: close -1
Forgot to add a version number to this report.
While trying to apply this patch to the latest version, I discovered
that there already is a RPi entry in version 3.79, and the reason this
did not work for me was that the wrong ker
Hello:
I'm also experiencing this problem. I've checked the content of the file
~/.config/kcminputrc and the settings are effectively changed in it.
However, neither the mouse cursor speed nor its acceleration seem to
take any effect. I've also tried to change the number of lines scrolled
by the m
15 matches
Mail list logo