On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:01:41AM +0700, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:05:17 +0200
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > That's unfortunate, yes, but there's no easy way to keep old packages
> > around in a given repository.
>
> That's one way to think about it. Got it, keeping old
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:58:27 +0200
Source: cdebconf
Binary: cdebconf cdebconf-gtk libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev
cdebconf-udeb cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-text-udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb cdebc
cdebconf_0.227_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.227.dsc
cdebconf_0.227.tar.xz
cdebconf-dbgsym_0.227_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk-dbgsym_0.227_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.227_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.227_i386.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.227_i386.u
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:05:17 +0200
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> That's unfortunate, yes, but there's no easy way to keep old packages
> around in a given repository.
That's one way to think about it. Got it, keeping old modules is hard.
But I wasn't asking about keeping old modules, I see no point in
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Was there at the very begining
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)? D
Works great thanks !
Hi,
Matt (2017-04-06):
> I've some problems with os-prober not recognizing my nixos
> installation on another harddrive. I've been tyring to debug this but
> I have to edit files in-place rather than from the git directory,
> i.e., I have to edit /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro
> direct
Hi,
I've some problems with os-prober not recognizing my nixos
installation on another harddrive. I've been tyring to debug this but
I have to edit files in-place rather than from the git directory,
i.e., I have to edit /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro
directly. And the makefile has no "i
Alexander Sosedkin (2017-04-05):
> > Added tag(s) stretch-ignore.
>
> Whatever it means, it sounds very wrong.
>
> I see you guys like discussing workarounds, but how about, you know,
> actually publishing the correct kernel for netboot in the repo?
> Somebody used to do that, why isn't it the c
Package: installation-reports
Followup-For: Bug #855075
Dear Maintainer,
(no need to cc me on followups tks)
tags moreinfo
thanks
hello,
i ran into a similar problem, but not with
DVDs, instead it was that i had two USB sticks
which happened to have iso images on them and
during the insta
> Added tag(s) stretch-ignore.
Whatever it means, it sounds very wrong.
I see you guys like discussing workarounds, but how about, you know,
actually publishing the correct kernel for netboot in the repo?
Somebody used to do that, why isn't it the case now?
http://debian.backend.mirrors.debian.o
Anything else I can do to get this issue looked into ?
Thanks,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
12 matches
Mail list logo