Hi,
Metztli Information Technology (2017-03-27):
> Boot method: CD/USB
> Image version: https://metztli.it/readOnlyEphemeral/xiuhcohuatl.iso built on
> Mar 25 08:35 (2017)
> Date: Mar 26, 2017, 01:49
A couple of months ago, I asked:
| Do we need to get installation reports for non-Debian instal
Hi,
Would you be interested in acquiring any of the updated contact databases
of below specified titles that will add great value to your marketing
programs?
We can segment Industry List & Technology Users List by C-level, VP-level,
Director-Level and Manager Level as per your requirements.
*
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this a
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 12:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> It's time to start thinking about our next stable point
> release. Here
> are some dates, please let us know which ones would work.
>
> * April 8-9
Not ideal, but should work.
> * April 15-16
Only on 16th.
> * April 22-23
> * April 29
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:54:18PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > One can always use http://snapshot.debian.org/ as one's mirror and
> > specify a dated URL that matches the ISO's creation date.
> I think (based on the last few paragraphs in the "Usage" section of
> that URL) that one would also
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 13:32 +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Alexander Sosedkin writes:
>
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:43:40 +0200
> > > > Philipp Kern wrote:
> >
> > > Even if we'd leave the old kernel udebs in testing for a while, you'd
> > > still hit a point where we'd need to drop them and ol
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:32:46 +0200
Philip Hands wrote:
> Alexander Sosedkin writes:
>
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:43:40 +0200
> > Philipp Kern wrote:
> >
> >> Even if we'd leave the old kernel udebs in testing for a while,
> >> you'd still hit a point where we'd need to drop them and old
> >>
Alexander Sosedkin writes:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:43:40 +0200
> Philipp Kern wrote:
>
>> Even if we'd leave the old kernel udebs in testing for a while, you'd
>> still hit a point where we'd need to drop them and old installers
>> would break.
>
> I can see that it's impossible to support dow
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:43:40 +0200
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Even if we'd leave the old kernel udebs in testing for a while, you'd
> still hit a point where we'd need to drop them and old installers
> would break.
I can see that it's impossible to support downloading modules for all
old ISOs.
But
On 2017-03-27 11:56, Nye Liu wrote:
The reason I ask is because I have custom grub menu configs that I
don't want to constantly hand edit or patch on a cron job along with a
cron to download the dailies... and then have no idea if the cron will
do the right thing, or if the daily even works. I'd
Thanks for your response.
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:31:45 +0200 Philipp Kern wrote:
> IOW: Is there a way to guarantee that
> (dist)/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz does not
> contain a kernel that has no modules package IN THAT SAME mirror?
>
> Or maybe even an automate
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:18:16PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> One thing I *haven't* tested yet is whether earlier kernel
> would make a difference -- not that I would think but who
> knows.
Just for kicks I booted all kernels installed on this machine
(all prior experimentation was done unde
12 matches
Mail list logo
