I am attempting to install jessie on a Dell Poweredge R815 (I have four). It
has been running wheezy reliably for years. And running squeeze reliably for
years before that. But no matter what I try it won't install or boot.
I have tried two ways.
1. I attempt a fresh install from a USB dongle. I
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:24:13AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> So yes, we *want* light-locker in the default Debian Xfce desktop. But that
> doesn't mean you can't use something else with the Xfce desktop environment
> under debian: just remove light-locker. Yes, it'll remove task-xfce-deskto
Hi Viktor,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> if an installation is attempted on a system with a PCI network interface
> only, it is necessary to select virtio as network interface to continue
> with the installation. This works because the virtio choice is
> eff
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:59 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> I'm surprised this is news for you.
This is not. And we're not going anywhere.
>
> Depends are used when something doesnt work without the depends. XFCE
> definitly works without a screensaver.
So you actuallu missed my point,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
> > Well, having it in recom
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 09:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
>
> Well, having it in recommends is enough for that.
Then I don't see the point in having Depends:
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 02:01 -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards
> > if
> > they
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Because we *want* light-locker as part of the default Xfce install.
Well, having it in recommends is enough for that.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On dim., 2016-06-19 at 08:03 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct.
> > > We
> > > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it
> > > afterwards
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards if
> they know what they do.
>
Uh, no, because when you go to delete li
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards if
> > they know what they do.
I still don't see why this cannot be achiev
tags 827562 wontfix
thanks
Quoting Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org):
> > > I suggest that task-xfce-desktop reduce the dependency on
> > > light-locker from Depends to Recommends.
>
> task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We
> want light-locker by default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 827562 wontfix
Bug #827562 [task-xfce-desktop] task-xfce-desktop: Depends on light-locker
Should Be Recommends
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
827562: http://bugs.debian
13 matches
Mail list logo
