flash-kernel_3.65_armel.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-04-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 08:09:09 +0200 Source: flash-kernel Binary: flash-kernel flash-kernel-installer Architecture: source armel Version: 3.65 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Ch

Processing of flash-kernel_3.65_armel.changes

2016-04-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
flash-kernel_3.65_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_3.65.dsc flash-kernel_3.65.tar.xz flash-kernel-installer_3.65_armel.udeb flash-kernel_3.65_armel.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Processing of flash-kernel_3.65_armel.changes

2016-04-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
flash-kernel_3.65_armel.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: flash-kernel_3.65.dsc flash-kernel_3.65.tar.xz flash-kernel-installer_3.65_armel.udeb flash-kernel_3.65_armel.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian

partman-auto (in)consistency

2016-04-30 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, I'm debugging an oddity in auto-partitioning with a friend, and we've found some odd inconsistencies in the partman-auto recipes in terms of swap space calculation. In *some* cases, swap size is set up as: 96 512 200% linux-swap (see recipes/home) but in others it's the much more

Re: [RFC] Call for review of GNU/screen support for D-I (was Re: Merge orion5x/kirkwood to flavour marvell and marvell-qnap)

2016-04-30 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Roger, Roger Shimizu wrote: > For example, I know for it's necessary to have GNU/screen support for > armel/armhf/arm64 platform; howover, for i386/amd64 PC, it usually > have CRT/LCD and physical keyboard attached, so it's easily to switch > console by Alt-F1 ~ F4 during debian installing.So f

Bug#740503: Still broken in 8.0.4

2016-04-30 Thread Jan Heitkötter
Hi Steve, Am 28.04.2016 um 23:42 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > You say 8.0.4; I assume you actually meant 8.4.0? Yes, typo >> BTW, information in Debian Wiki is >> outdated. The text talks about tarballs, but >>