If only I had had a test environment to test my rewrite against, oh
well.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> +Template: netcfg/use_vlan
> +Type: boolean
> +Default: false
> +# :sl6:
> +_Description: Are you configuring on an IEEE 802.1Q VLAN trunk port?
> + Virt
Mapping jessie to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:13:25 +0100
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64
debian-inst
On 03/30/2016 09:53 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:26:11AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> As Jared was mentioning to me the other day, there is unfortunately a
>> mentality in the server world of not installing the OS in UEFI yet and
>> leave the CSM enabled. The be
On 03/30/2016 09:48 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:16:35AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Can you comment what version of Windows you had noticed this behavior?
>> We actually factory install as old as Windows 7 with GPT disks in legacy
>> mode at Dell. We don't fa
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20120712
Severity: serious
Justification: silently ignores failures, creating broken packages
Hi,
Whilst preparing the dini uploads for the upcoming point releases, on
debdiffing the binary packages against the previous versions I noticed
that one
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u3.b1_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u3.b1.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u3.b1.tar.xz
debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64_20150422+deb8u3.b1_all.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 753163
Bug #753163 {Done: Daniel Kahn Gillmor } [gnupg-agent]
gnupg-agent: depends on pinentry-gtk2
Bug #764292 {Done: Daniel Kahn Gillmor } [gnupg-agent]
gnupg2: brings too many dependencies into standard task
Unarchived Bug 753163
Un
Mapping wheezy to oldstable.
Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:50:39 +0100
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Binary: debian-installer-7.0-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-7.0-netboo
debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u3.b1_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u3.b1.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u3.b1.tar.gz
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-amd64_20130613+deb7u3.b1_all
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 10:26 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > > You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
> > >
> > > ip link add link eth0 name
On 2016-03-30 09:39 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> Yes, UI/cursor-hightlight is bit strange. But it at least works.
>> I'll try to make libraries, introduced by screen, udeb support first,
>> and then fix the UI issue.
>
> Some progress updat
---
debian/changelog | 2 ++
netcfg-common.c | 1 +
netcfg.h | 3 +++
vlan.c| 16
write_interface.c | 15 +++
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 2a5e4e6..7b7aebe 100644
-
---
debian/changelog | 1 +
vlan.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 7b7aebe..941c16d 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ netcfg (1.138) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* All of above resolves
---
Makefile | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 3 ++
debian/netcfg-common.templates | 34 +++--
netcfg.c | 5
netcfg.h | 2 ++
vlan.c | 67 +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 433568 + pending
Bug #433568 [netcfg] add vlan support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
433568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433568
Debian Bug Tracking
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:13:11AM +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Today I tried already to complain about this at paste.debian.net:
>
>
> >
> > Debian Stretch testing is currently installable, but it is not bootable, I
> > tried this
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:16:35AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Can you comment what version of Windows you had noticed this behavior?
> We actually factory install as old as Windows 7 with GPT disks in legacy
> mode at Dell. We don't factory install Windows 8 or Windows 10 in
> legacy mode.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:26:11AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> As Jared was mentioning to me the other day, there is unfortunately a
> mentality in the server world of not installing the OS in UEFI yet and
> leave the CSM enabled. The best way to allow for that mentality to
> break is to all
Thanks for the comments.
On 03/30/2016 06:11 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:50:27PM -0500, mario_limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
>> I was briefly discussing this with Steve McIntyre and wanted to bring
>> it to a wider discussion. Currently users need to make a selection at
>> i
Le 30/03/2016 03:48, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On 2016-03-29, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 07:50 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [...]
>>> I'd like to propose changing this and by default install both legacy and
>>> UEFI bootloaders on architectures that support both
On 03/30/2016 09:11 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:50:27PM -0500, mario_limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Certainly windows can NOT boot GPT disks if booted in legacy mode,
> and can only boot GPT disks in UEFI mode.
>
> So you sure can't choose GPT always if there is any ot
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> > You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
> >
> > ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9
> > or
> > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9
> >
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:50:27PM -0500, mario_limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was briefly discussing this with Steve McIntyre and wanted to bring it to a
> wider discussion. Currently users need to make a selection at installation
> time whether to install in UEFI mode or in Legacy mo
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
>
> ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9
> or
> ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9
>
>
I know that. vlan package is needed for the ifupdown hooks to parse
vlan stanza from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 818611 + pending
Bug #818611 [netcfg] netcfg: Misleading error message when parsing line with
trailing blank
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
818611: http://bugs.debian.o
El 11/10/15 a las 23:29, Dominic Hargreaves escribió:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 05:45:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 16:50 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > ndisc6 (
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:50:27PM -0500, mario_limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> I was briefly discussing this with Steve McIntyre and wanted to bring
> it to a wider discussion. Currently users need to make a selection at
> installation time whether to install in UEFI mode or in Legacy mode.
In fac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 795211 grave
Bug #795211 [yaboot-installer] Yaboot in Jessie, following Jessie OS
installation, fails to boot Mac OS X
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> user debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-powe...@lists.debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today I tried already to complain about this at paste.debian.net:
>
> Debian Stretch testing is currently installable, but it is not bootable, I
> tried this several times since last week. First of all GRUB is not
> installable on BTRFS-par
29 matches
Mail list logo
