Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 06:49:40 +0100
Source: partman-nbd
Binary: partman-nbd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
partman-nbd_0.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-nbd_0.31.dsc
partman-nbd_0.31.tar.xz
partman-nbd_0.31_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
partman-nbd_0.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-nbd_0.31.dsc
partman-nbd_0.31.tar.xz
partman-nbd_0.31_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
On 16/12/15 00:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/12/15 00:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2015-12-16):
>>> On 15/12/15 23:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags:
Hi,
Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-16):
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:59:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-15):
> > > Control: tags -1 + patch
> > >
> > > Attach a patch to check if the DASD is already online because
> > > trying to set a DASD online twice results in
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:59:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-15):
> > Control: tags -1 + patch
> >
> > Attach a patch to check if the DASD is already online because
> > trying to set a DASD online twice results in an error causing
> > the s390-dasd module to
Hi Dimitri,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:33:56PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 15 December 2015 at 17:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-15):
> >> Package: d-i.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >> Tags: d-i
> >>
> >> Dear Debian Installer Team and Maintainers,
> >>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 16.12.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>
> >> Wouldn't be hard to add this check to setupcon itself.
> >
> > Setupcon is a portable script that can be used
Am 16.12.2015 um 15:28 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I don't see why this check would make it init system dependend or
>> dependend on Debian specifics.
>
> I was talking about the following check: whether initrd has configured
> the
Am 16.12.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't be hard to add this check to setupcon itself.
>
> Setupcon is a portable script that can be used on any distribution ---
> Debian or not, on Linux or FreeBSD, with system
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Wouldn't be hard to add this check to setupcon itself.
Setupcon is a portable script that can be used on any distribution ---
Debian or not, on Linux or FreeBSD, with systemd or without systemd.
Although currently console-setup
Am 16.12.2015 um 12:16 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:47:24AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/90-setupcon.rules
>> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="vtconsole", KERNEL=="vtcon*",
>> RUN+="/bin/setupcon"
>
> What does this do?
It runs setupcon when the bac
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 06:07:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-15):
> > Package: d-i.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: d-i
> >
> > Dear Debian Installer Team and Maintainers,
> >
> > I would like to contribute a new package for the Debian Installer
> >
Hi Philipp,
Alexander (on CC) just reported ran into the same issue. His system has more
than 20 DASDs and the dialog continues to show up. The triggers the
special debconf return code and the "hardware-detection" dependency for this
module is not satisfied. This reported when starting the par
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:47:24AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/90-setupcon.rules
> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="vtconsole", KERNEL=="vtcon*",
> RUN+="/bin/setupcon"
What does this do? I mean when does the action "add" of "vtconsole"
occur? During the boot or when the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:16:58AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> I shall now add:
>
>>> This is a shot in the dark, but can you try and create the following
>>> udev rules file:
>>>
>>> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/90-setupcon.rules
>>> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="vtconsole", KERNEL=="vtcon*",
>>>
Hi Cyril!
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:06:01AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (2015-12-02):
> > > Mathieu mentioned branches a while ago:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/05/msg00271.html
> > >
> > >
> > That's spot on, it's exactly what is needed in partma
17 matches
Mail list logo
