Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.134
Severity: normal
User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: initscripts-dep
Hi,
your package keyboard-configuration declares a dependency on the
initscripts package.
Please check, if this dependency is actually needed and remove
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:14:35 +0100
Source: flash-kernel
Binary: flash-kernel flash-kernel-installer
Architecture: source armel
Version: 3.49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Ch
flash-kernel_3.49_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_3.49.dsc
flash-kernel_3.49.tar.xz
flash-kernel-installer_3.49_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_3.49_armel.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
flash-kernel_3.49_armel.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
flash-kernel_3.49.dsc
flash-kernel_3.49.tar.xz
flash-kernel-installer_3.49_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_3.49_armel.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian
Sorry, botched From header in previous.
Please find syslog here: pastebin.com/dajjZQBc
Please find syslog here: pastebin.com/dajjZQBc
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2015-10-02):
> It's been a few days without any daily builds so I've decided to apply
> my patch on all linux and kfreebsd porterboxes, after adjusting some
> bits:
> - missing http.sslCAinfo parameter on one;
> - missing merge from origin/porterbox for some.
>
> I'll take
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-11-12):
> Hi Cyril!
>
> I just stumbled across this bug while I was going through the BTS
> looking for unresolved sparc* issues.
>
> Since I am also a porter for x32, I would be rather thrilled to see
> x32 support in Debian Installer. Do you think there is
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 11:28 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> > If the output is -1, the bug has been fixed. If the output is 0, then
> > the bug is still present. 0 indicates the two strings are equal. Clearly
On 11/12/2015 11:28 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> If the output is -1, the bug has been fixed. If the output is 0, then
> the bug is still present. 0 indicates the two strings are equal. Clearly
> they are not. :)
Looks like it has been fixed. Anything non-zero means strcmp says the
strings are not
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:20 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/PortsSparc
> >
> > Started a catagory of major bugs. Please place links and titles to
> > the bug report in this list so we can better track the status and
> > reference th
> https://wiki.debian.org/PortsSparc
>
> Started a catagory of major bugs. Please place links and titles to
> the bug report in this list so we can better track the status and
> reference the problems quickly.
The underlying upstream issue of this bug in glibc seems to have been
fixed [1], so I as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 706743 EFI partition is created when installing in legacy mode
Bug #706743 [debian-installer] EFI partion is created when installing in legacy
mode
Changed Bug title to 'EFI partition is created when installing in legacy mode'
from 'EFI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 706743 EFI installation in Legacy Mode
Bug #706743 [debian-installer] Fwd: Efi in Legacy mode
Changed Bug title to 'EFI installation in Legacy Mode' from 'Fwd: Efi in Legacy
mode'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 706743 EFI partion is created when installing in legacy mode
Bug #706743 [debian-installer] EFI installation in Legacy Mode
Changed Bug title to 'EFI partion is created when installing in legacy mode'
from 'EFI installation in Legacy Mode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Cyril!
I just stumbled across this bug while I was going through the BTS
looking for unresolved sparc* issues.
Since I am also a porter for x32, I would be rather thrilled to see
x32 support in Debian Installer. Do you think there is a realistic
Business Deal of 24.5m usd for you, Reply back for more details if interested.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:debian-installer
Bug #803769 [cdimage.debian.org] cdimage.debian.org: hangs on Allwinner board
after "Detecting hardware" and emits E: Unimplemented function
Bug reassigned from package 'cdimage.debian.org' to 'src:debian-installer'.
Ignoring request
Sure, I checked and that is a folder.
Which file exactly do you need?
On 11/12/2015 11:11 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Is there any chance you could send us the installer's syslog (stored
under /var/log/installer)?
On 11/12/2015 12:28 PM, Jose R R wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Edward Shishkin
wrote:
On 09/21/2015 01:12 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 07:40:37AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
I have realized that although partman-reiser4 udeb enables Reiser4 to
be listed as an option
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for answer.
1.
I think that we are not referring to the same line.
jessie-updates is in fact there for volatile, I am referring to the one
above it, that should read security.debian.org, that is the critical one.
2.
OK, but there is an extra forward slash that should not be the
Hi Carlos,
Carlos Kosloff (2015-11-12):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20150422+deb8u2
> Severity: important
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 8.2
> APT prefers stable-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20150422+deb8u2
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.U
On 11/12/2015 05:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 19:13 -0500, James Valleroy wrote:
>> On 11/11/2015 03:43 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Perhaps you could drop to a shell and try manually loading those
>>> modules and see what, if anything, it says?
>> Modules seem to load ok:
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Edward Shishkin
wrote:
> On 09/21/2015 01:12 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 07:40:37AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
>>>
>>> I have realized that although partman-reiser4 udeb enables Reiser4 to
>>> be listed as an option during the Debian-Installer
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 19:13 -0500, James Valleroy wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 03:43 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Perhaps you could drop to a shell and try manually loading those
> > modules and see what, if anything, it says?
>
> Modules seem to load ok:
Did lsusb (or maybe usb-list in d-i env) then st
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 18:46 -0600, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2014-09-30, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 08:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 00:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > However, at the moment initramfs-tools won't include PHY drivers
> > > >
27 matches
Mail list logo
