[cc me on replies]
This is a critical bug making the entire live installation unusable. Can
we fix this before 8.1?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785069
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Someone on my team at Dell made a doc on how to do this with SLESa few years
ago. I can't look it up right now, but a search for "Stuart Hayes UEFI PXE"
should pull it up. It shows how to set up the DHCP server too so that you don't
break legacy PXE too.
That should be a good starting point.
-
[ Adding CC to debian-efi for this - we have a mailing for EFI
stuff...! ]
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:43 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 09:30 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> > I can't find any references for how
I'm wishing to use Debian-Installer to create a Debian (testing)
installation with a full disk encryption scheme where the root partition
is a file system directly atop the dm-crypt device.
As it stands, it appears the installer requires you to create a
partition table on the Encrypted Volumes
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #786882 [debian-installer] debian-installer: FTBFS on arm64: can't find dtbs
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
786882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Ian Campbell (2015-05-26):
> Upstream decided to structure things a bit more (by vendor). Sorry for
> not thinking of d-i when I fixed up the kernel packaging side.
Thanks for your push. For those following at home, that's:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debi
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:43 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 09:30 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > I can't find any references for how to PXE boot UEFI: I find lots of
> > posts complaining that pxelinux.0 is not compatible with UEFI and not
> > much more.
>
> I've struggled
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 09:30 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> I can't find any references for how to PXE boot UEFI: I find lots of
> posts complaining that pxelinux.0 is not compatible with UEFI and not
> much more.
I've struggled a bit with this recently for work and am still figuring
some stuff
Ian Campbell (2015-05-26):
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:16 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > → Besides the ABI bump, one can see apm/ and arm/ being introduced here.
> > src:debian-installer likely needs to learn how to handle this.
>
> Upstream decided to structure things a bit more (by vendor).
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:16 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
> There seems to be some dtb dance here, and I think the src:linux's
> having relocated the dtbs under subdirectories is responsible for the
> FTBFS. Comparing some recent kernels:
> | kibi@wodi:/tmp/linux-kernel$ debdiff
> binary-ker
Suffering an XY problem here: I want to set up a small machine to work as DHCP/
TFTP server to serve as part of an autobuilder to provision lots of machines
built as a
standard build for Debian 8. I have a set up for providing PXE from a
Cubietruck running Debian.
I have a TFTP/DHCP set up whi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wontfix
Bug #432309 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debootstrap] should
check Release signature by default?
Bug #515938 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debootstrap]
debootstrap: check release files by default, perhaps suggest/recommend
Bug #610753 {Done: Cyril Bruleb
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Seeing this "solved" by an opt-in for being secure switch is simply
embarrassing for Debian's already not so shining security philosophies
and paradigms.
There's basically no reason that speaks against doing it properly, i.e.
vice-versa: requiring verification by defaul
Cyril Brulebois (2015-05-25):
> Holger Wansing (2015-05-24):
> > probably we should do an upload for installation-guide before 8.1,
> > to get updated manual into Jessie?
> >
> > The 8.0 manual says, the graphical installer is the default,
> > there were many last-second changings in the english
'DISTRIB_ID=Debian' > ./tmp/device-tree/tree/etc/lsb-release; \
| echo 'DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"' >>
./tmp/device-tree/tree/etc/lsb-release; \
| echo 'DISTRIB_RELEASE="9 (stretch) - installer build 20150526-0
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Vagrant Cascadian (2015-05-25):
> On 2015-05-24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> The version of u-boot in experimental requires some changes for
> >> debian-installer to generate appropriate u-boot images.
> ...
> >> The update to debian-installer and u-boot 2015.04+ upl
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #786369 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Updates for cubox-i/wandboard
with u-boot 2015.04+
Added tag(s) pending.
--
786369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786369
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 786872 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786873
Bug #786872 [installation-reports] installation-report: Jessie (8) on Neoware
m100 mobile thin-client without graphics
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.debian
Vagrant Cascadian (2015-05-25):
> On 2015-05-25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Now that I've looked at board/solidrun/mx6cuboxi/mx6cuboxi.c it seems
> > one is supposed to distinguish between boards by toying with GPIOs
> > (mx6cuboxi.c in u-boot), so nothing for d-i to worry about, as long as
> > th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.58
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
It's another VIA-device without graphics-output, I wished, it would work by
default, not
the other way around, getting fixes upon request.
- -- Package-specific info:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:21:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information
> > about all (including empty) partitions!
>
> Ok, I see. Sounds like the proposed patch is appropriate then
Gedaan met tijd verliezen aan de verwerking van uw post. Dankzij de
frankeermachine bespaart u niet alleen tijd, maar ook geld!
Vind de beste leverancier:
http://www.debesteleverancier.be/frankeermachine/gratis-offerte.htm?lng=nl&tg=frama&utm_campaign=frama&utm_source=admr&utm_medium=email&you=con
Gedaan met tijd verliezen aan de verwerking van uw post. Dankzij de
frankeermachine bespaart u niet alleen tijd, maar ook geld!
Vind de beste leverancier:
http://www.debesteleverancier.be/frankeermachine/gratis-offerte.htm?lng=nl&tg=frama&utm_campaign=frama&utm_source=admr&utm_medium=email&you=deb
23 matches
Mail list logo
