Michael Lager, le Wed 06 May 2015 14:32:23 +0100, a écrit :
> The reason the upgrade failed when starting X was that colord couldn't start
> because it was missing libudev.so.0 as reported:
>
> "/usr/lib/colord/colord: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0:
> cannot open shared object
On 5 May 2015 at 19:45, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> * Packages currently at "important":
> - cron:
> Not needed in chroot/container environments.
Hm, i'd say it's not needed full-stop. There are systemd timer units
and e.g. systemd-cron that satisfy the need for periodic execution,
with
For what it's worth, I bumped into this while upgrading from 1.118
in a pre-release jessie to 1.123 from released jessie.
According to http://www.fifi.org/doc/debconf-doc/tutorial.html#AEN198
it's possibly because there are file descriptors left open at the end
of the postinst.
Calling db_stop e
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:00:20PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > - dnsutils:
> > bind9-host provides a (limited) DNS query interface. No need to
> > install both bind9-host and dnsutils by default.
> > -> demote to "optional"
>
> I'd actually argue for demoting bind9-host a
On 2015-05-06 11:21:13 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > - nfacct:
> > No idea why this is at Priority: important.
> > -> demote to "optional"
> Even extra... This is a very niche package and I have no idea why it is
> being installed everywhere!
jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org (2015-05-06):
> Yep, I think so... I'm looking at it now.
> The question is how to rebuilt a debian CD after.
> Will a replacement of kernel package and udeb kernel package in the
> pool/l/linux will be sufficient ?
You're going to end up with GPG check issues if you do so
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:26:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>>> cron is part of POSIX.
>>
>> The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX person
>> are...
>
>Perhaps uni
Geert Stappers (2015-05-06):
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:01:29AM +0200, jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org wrote:
> > Le 2015-05-05 18:56, Geert Stappers a écrit:
> > >
> > >
> > >FWIW: I think that at '*' has to be something like
> > >
> > >tar xf data.tar
> > >
> >
> > Hum...Hum... True that I forget
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:21:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
>> * Same for question for "dmidecode": could the priority be lowered to
>>"standard"?
>I think that this is fine, as long as it is still available in d-i.
>But laptop-detect (which I do not un
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:45:09 PM EEST, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
>>- traceroute
>
>#3 on old - I used to use it more, but these days with firewalls it
>doesn't strike as very useful.
I know I use mtr in preference these days, anyw
On May 06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Note that I believe this has changed over time: with the advent of VMs
> and containers the expectations what a system should minimally provide
> have become smaller.
The differences between VMs and "normal" servers are very small, limited
only to a few packa
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:01:29AM +0200, jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org wrote:
> Le 2015-05-05 18:56, Geert Stappers a écrit:
> >
> >
> >FWIW: I think that at '*' has to be something like
> >
> >tar xf data.tar
> >
>
> Hum...Hum... True that I forget something... my bad.
> This should be more someth
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> cron is part of POSIX.
>
> The problem here is what the expectations of an experienced UNIX person are...
Perhaps unix/posix tasks would satisfy such folks.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.d
On 05/06/2015 11:34 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Tue May 05, 2015 at 20:45:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> * Packages currently at "important":
>> - cron:
>> Not needed in chroot/container environments.
>> -> demote to "standard"
>
> RC.
>
> | important
> | Important p
Hi,
On Tue May 05, 2015 at 20:45:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> * Packages currently at "important":
> - cron:
> Not needed in chroot/container environments.
> -> demote to "standard"
RC.
| important
| Important programs, including those which one would expect to find on
|
On May 06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> But is this enough reason to keep w3m at priority standard? Personally I
> would rather use "ssh -D" or such than bothering with a rather limited
> text-mode browser.
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
pgponSqgK84RI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On May 05, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
Me too.
Let's look at the problem from a different point of view. This is what
I remove when building cloud images for my employer's infrastructure:
dpkg --purge \
discover discover-da
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:45:09 PM EEST, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
[ Please send replies only to boot@ ]
Cross-checking with popcon old (installed but not used) data
from: http://popcon.debian.org/by_old
This won't catch daemons etc, or take in account use in script. But if it
ends up in the
Le 2015-05-05 16:52, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org (2015-05-05):
As a workaround, you can :
- Boot on the Debian CD
- Select Rescue
- Change to a terminal
- cd /tmp
- ar x
/cdrom/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64_3.16.7-ckt7-1_amd64.deb
- xzcat data.tar.xz
- cd /
Le 2015-05-05 18:56, Geert Stappers a écrit :
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:11:14PM +0200, jean-y...@lenhof.eu.org
wrote:
Hi,
As a workaround, you can :
- Boot on the Debian CD
- Select Rescue
- Change to a terminal
- cd /tmp
- ar x
/cdrom/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64_3.16.7-ckt7
Paul Wise writes:
>> - cron:
>> Not needed in chroot/container environments.
>> -> demote to "standard"
>
> A lot of packages ship cron jobs, I guess this means they will need to
> depend on cron?
They already have to depend on cron if it is required for proper
operation (or recom
21 matches
Mail list logo