oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:07:22 +0200 Source: oldsys-preseed Binary: oldsys-preseed Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian

Processing of oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.changes

oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: oldsys-preseed_3.16.dsc oldsys-preseed_3.16.tar.xz oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bo

Processing of oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.changes

oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: oldsys-preseed_3.16.dsc oldsys-preseed_3.16.tar.xz oldsys-preseed_3.16_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#783019: marked as done (kirkwood network console images ask to choose ethernet device)

Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#783019: fixed in oldsys-preseed 3.16 has caused the Debian Bug report #783019, regarding kirkwood network console images ask to choose ethernet device to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#764982: Backports when the danger is contrib and non-free

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:00:09PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 20-04-15 om 22:19 schreef Geert Stappers: > > Op 20-04-15 om 09:39 schreef Turbo Fredriksson: > >> Besides, we had this exact argument for weeks (months) about contrib > >> and non-free 'in the day'. Eventually, _that_ (amongst

Bug#783042: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Boot method: sdcard (microSDHC) Image version: Jessie RC 3 from http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-armhf/current/images/netboot/SD-card-images/ Date: Tue Apr 21 01:27:41 UTC 2015 Machine: cubieboard a10 (revision 2) Processor: armhf Memory:

Bug#783041: Advanced Options in Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer (Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer AMD64 DVD ( Re-submited)

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 06:47:40PM -0700, Ricky Ritchey wrote: >Comments/Problems:after I booted up the “Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer >”, I clicked on >“Advanced Options” in the installation menu and the “Alternative >Desktop Environment”

Bug#783041: Advanced Options in Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer (Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer AMD64 DVD ( Re-submited)

Package:installation-reports (Debian 8 Jessie DI-rc3 installer AMD64 DVD) Boot method: DVD Image version: Date: Machine: Processor:Intel Celeron 925 Memory:3 GB DDR3 Partitions: Don't

Bug#764982: Backports when the danger is contrib and non-free

Op 20-04-15 om 22:19 schreef Geert Stappers: > Op 20-04-15 om 09:39 schreef Turbo Fredriksson: >> Besides, we had this exact argument for weeks (months) about contrib >> and non-free 'in the day'. Eventually, _that_ (amongst others) "won" >> the argument - it's not an official part of Debian GNU/Li

Processed: tagging 763695, reassign 763695 to keyboard-configuration, affects 763695 ..., usertagging 763695

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 763695 + help Bug #763695 [console-setup] console-setup is slowest part of boot, not fast as setupcon manpage tells us Added tag(s) help. > reassign 763695 keyboard-configuration console-setup/1.113 Bug #763695 [console-setup] console-setup

Bug#764982: Backports when the danger is contrib and non-free

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > On Apr 20, 2015, at 7:01 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > I really don't think this is a good idea and I'm this close to > > re-close the bug report. > > > Well, I asked a fair question I think. I knew the answer (but I could

Bug#764982: marked as done (apt-setup-udeb: Backports via d-i, but not by default)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:01:45 +0200 with message-id <20150420200145.go23...@gpm.stappers.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#764982: Backports, 2B || !2B has caused the Debian Bug report #764982, regarding apt-setup-udeb: Backports via d-i, but not by default to be marked as done. This mea

Re: Bug#781882: frequent flash-kernel triggers on Wheezy->Jessie upgrade

Control: reasssign -1 flash-kernel flash-kernel/3.34 On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:49:14 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: retitle -2 frequent flash-kernel triggers on Wheezy->Jessie upgrade > Control: severity -2 normal > Control: found -2 3.34 > > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 13:04

Bug#783019: kirkwood network console images ask to choose ethernet device

On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 19:11 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > By commenting out that one line things seem to progress in a way which > looks promising (i.e. much more spew than above). I think the most > plausible solution would be: > > diff --git a/oldsys-preseed b/oldsys-preseed > index f60196f..4cd

Bug#758410: marked as done (d-i manual: update for bootmenu entries of graphical installer)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:18:01 +0200 with message-id <20150420201801.17eea1c9afae1a55a703e...@wansing-online.de> and subject line Re: Bug#758410: d-i manual: update for bootmenu entries of graphical installer has caused the Debian Bug report #758410, regarding d-i manual: update for

Bug#783019: kirkwood network console images ask to choose ethernet device

Package: oldsys-preseed Version: 3.15 Severity: grave Tags: patch Doing a test install of jessie on my TS-419 I get asked (via the serial) for a serial port and a ssh password. I happen to have a serial port but these devices mostly do not and are supposed to be headless. I'm using the images fro

Re: Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:26:10AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > While we're at it, it would be nice to have the same "Only if I > explicitly ask for it" feature for non-free (and probably contrib). > I may be willing to compromise my freedom in order to get my laptop wifi > working, on the basis

Re: Debian Installer Jessie RC 3 release

Hello Installer experts, Am Sonntag, den 19.04.2015, 16:25 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Feedback for this release > = > > We need your help to find bugs and further improve the installer, so > please try it. Installer CDs, other media and everything else you will > ne

Bug#769778: marked as done (installation-report: Testing set up by upgrading Stable)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:27:03 +0200 with message-id <20150420132703.4775986b@s5.lokal> and subject line done has caused the Debian Bug report #769778, regarding installation-report: Testing set up by upgrading Stable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Philip Hands wrote: > Turbo Fredriksson writes: >> >> Good for you. Maybe it's better now, but my opinion still stands. > > Well, that's a jolly constructive attitude, well done. Not how I meant it, but thanx for misunderstanding. I meant that my opinion about back

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:48 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Backports main is official Debian. [1] You misunderstand the announcement. … official Debian service … Notice the last word here! It say "service". Not 'official _PART_ of Debian'! -- Life sucks and then you die -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#764982: Backports, 2B || !2B

On Apr 20, 2015, at 7:01 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I really don't think this is a good idea and I'm this close to > re-close the bug report. Well, I asked a fair question I think. I knew the answer (but I could be wrong - I haven't been paying attention to Debian GNU/Linux matters in years)

Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)

Turbo Fredriksson writes: > On Apr 19, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >> Did you check if it really was back ports? > > Yes. I've been using Debian GNU/Linux since.. 'bo' or something and a DD since > '97 or so. I know what I'm doing (98% of the time :). > >> I use backports on all