On 2015-03-19 03:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...]
>
> Thank you. Could we get those added as well please?
>
>
> # fix for nasty bug #778773:
> unblock partman-base/183
> unblock-udeb partman-base/183
>
> # no objection from d-i PoV at first glance:
> unblock-udeb openssh/1:6.7p1-4
>
Ack, ap
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20130613+deb7u2 20150107
Severity: normal
Toying around with monolithic images made me (re?)discover that crypto
components are missing there. The reason seems to be their priority
(optional), meaning they don't get automatically picked up in the
pkg-lists/standa
Niels Thykier (2015-03-18):
> On 2015-03-18 16:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
> > urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
> > don't get previous hints obsoleted.
> > [...]
> >
> >
On 2014-12-28 13:34, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > If we choose this solution, here is a quick and dirty patch against
> > di-autobuild to do that. It's basically changing the hardcoded paths
> > and call to schroot. There is probably more
Hi,
Christian Perrier (2015-01-26):
> partman-target (94) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[ Steve McIntyre ]
>* Don't add entries for random USB media to /etc/fstab, they're not
> useful. Closes: #761815
I'd like to know how that was tested. Using libvirt, importing mini.iso
as a US
Hello all,
in attachment proposal for manpages for os-prober based on it's
documentation.
Please review and improve.
Feel free to use it.
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
.\" Manpage for os-prober.
.\" Contact debian-boot@lists.debian.org for improvements.
.TH os-pro
Hi,
On Montag, 9. März 2015, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Well, what happened in #757413 doesn't fill me with joy indeed. And
> now the same happens with these bug reports a few hours after that…
about #771617: I often setup LVM inside encrypted partitions on wheezy, so I
was fairly sure this bug do
On 2015-03-18 16:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
> urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
> don't get previous hints obsoleted.
> [...]
>
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niel
Hi,
here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
don't get previous hints obsoleted.
# update master list + l10n:
unblock choose-mirror/2.61
unblock-udeb choose-mirror/2.61
# l10n:
unblock clock-s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 780545 +jessie +sid
Bug #780545 [os-prober] os-prober looping with formated partitions without OS
Added tag(s) jessie.
Bug #780545 [os-prober] os-prober looping with formated partitions without OS
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing
On 18 March 2015 at 11:59, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> And really, the best way to get this fixed is to write the missing manpage.
Attached. Please add to the Debian package.
linux-boot-prober.8
Description: Binary data
os-prober.8
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I have a PXE booting configured with Debian installer for testing/jessie
too. I noticed, that on help screen is only available label "menu".
Labels "install" and "expert" are missing. I need also the text-only
startup screen, because of DRAC SOL installations.
I think this change is source of
Chris Bainbridge (2015-03-18):
> On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> > Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> > submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
>
> Isn't a missing man page a violation of the requirement stated in
> D
Hi Chris,
On Mittwoch, 18. März 2015, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> > submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
>
> Isn't a missing man page a violation of th
On 18 March 2015 at 11:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug. If you want it to happen,
> submit one. Artificially bumping the severity won't help.
Isn't a missing man page a violation of the requirement stated in
Debian Policy Manual 12.1? Hence violation of p
Control: severity -1 normal
Debian Bug Tracking System (2015-03-18):
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > severity 542899 serious
> Bug #542899 [os-prober] os-prober: please add a man page
> Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
Pretty sure that's in no way a serious bug.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #542899 [os-prober] os-prober: please add a man page
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
542899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 542899 serious
Bug #542899 [os-prober] os-prober: please add a man page
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
542899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
18 matches
Mail list logo