Re: Bug#163737: Are You Having Bad Teeth? sU

It is weird to hear that many celebrities are with bad teeth, do you know Tom Cruise had some horrible teeth. My friend shows me his previous time images; I was really shocking for me. celebrities with bad teeth -- View

Re: on my retirement from Debian

Hi Joey. Joey Hess (2014-11-07): > Since I'm leaving Debian, I won't be involved in d-i any longer. > > I haven't had time or bandwidth to do much for years, so no great loss. ;) > I will remove myself from the couple of packages I'm still listed in > Uploaders. > > https://lists.debian.org/deb

on my retirement from Debian

Since I'm leaving Debian, I won't be involved in d-i any longer. I haven't had time or bandwidth to do much for years, so no great loss. ;) I will remove myself from the couple of packages I'm still listed in Uploaders. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/11/msg00174.html I look forward t

debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:43:19 + Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.48+deb7u2 Distribution: wheezy Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By

Bug#766459: marked as done (debootstrap: should not try to configure base-files before /etc/passwd has the usual users in a Debian system)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:17:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#766459: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.48+deb7u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #766459, regarding debootstrap: should not try to configure base-files before /etc/passwd has the usual users in a Debian system to b

Bug#766459: debootstrap/base-passwd: #767999 and #766459 should really be fixed in base-passwd

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:06:07PM +, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > At least Santiago's and my opinion diverge on whether base-passwd is presently > in line with policy on 3.8 Essential packages. Therefore the route from here > appears to hinge on interpreting policy in one of two ways: my point

Bug#768464: preseed install of Debian Jessie failing

Package: installation-reports Boot method: ISO image attached to a VirtualBox VM Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/debian-testing-i386-DVD-1.iso Image sha1 hash: 028a7c958a8f15bd6fe6f6cb43a28cf6a9950f45 Date: 5 November 2014. 11:15 GMT Machine: HP EliteB

Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +1100, csir...@yahoo.com.au wrote: > Apologies in advance. You really hit a nerve here. > > Kernel 3.7 was released December 2012. Debian project created a dependency on > this for the default init system roughly 15 months later. Which is fine, and > perfectly

Bug#768184: debian-installer: Progress indicator sometimes false

Stéphane Aulery (2014-11-07): > Le mercredi 05 novembre 2014 à 10:48:29, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > > > ISTR apt's unable to count (possibly because it can't or at least > > doesn't know in advance how many files it will need). > > At other times the sequence is correct. This is not always ap

Bug#768184: debian-installer: Progress indicator sometimes false

Le mercredi 05 novembre 2014 à 10:48:29, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > ISTR apt's unable to count (possibly because it can't or at least > doesn't know in advance how many files it will need). At other times the sequence is correct. This is not always apt working below? I did not know where to fi

debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Mapping wheezy to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:43:19 + Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.48+deb7u2 Distribution: wheezy Ur

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2_amd64.changes

debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2.dsc debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.48+deb7u2_all.deb debootstrap-udeb_1.0.48+deb7u2_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on

Bug#768445: debootstrap: fails when called with --include=a,b,..

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.64 Severity: normal debootstrap dies with an obscure error when called with the --include option which has more than a couple of packages: $ sudo /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=mips --foreign --no-resolve-deps \ --variant=minbase --verbose \ --include=wireless-tool

Bug#768427: debian-installer: build-depends: elilo [ia64], with elilo gone away

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal We're still build-depending on elilo on ia64, while this package got removed (#755509); since ia64 is quite unmaintained, it might make sense to actually drop this build dependency and let release people know that they can drop this package from the d-i n

Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd

-Original Message- From: Cyril Brulebois To: Simon Richter Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-embed...@lists.debian.org, debootst...@packages.debian.org, cdebootst...@packages.debian.org Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:45 Subject: Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd > You might

Re: Problem with uefi motherboard.

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:29:50PM -0500, Ryan Larrowe wrote: > My computer won't boot after a fresh install. Grub says unknown > file system and starts rescue mode. I've tried searching some posts > on the issue but none have worked. I have a 200MB efi partition > that I did not set a mount poi