Bug#648251: os-prober: Still not solved in version 1.63 after two years

2014-02-19 Thread Peter Littmann
Package: os-prober Version: 1.63 Followup-For: Bug #648251 Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I have Fedora installed on /dev/md5(RAID1) but update-grub / os-prober didn't found it. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Implementing

Bug#666974: installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb

2014-02-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 February 2014 20:02, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > Package: grub-installer > Version: 1.85 > Followup-For: Bug #666974 > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > The bug is still present in Wheezy's installer. The enclosed (naive) > patch makes sure grub-installer jumps to state 2 (hence ignores > $d

Processed: Bug#666974: installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb

2014-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 666974 patch Bug #666974 [grub-installer] installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#666974: installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb

2014-02-19 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Package: grub-installer Version: 1.85 Followup-For: Bug #666974 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, The bug is still present in Wheezy's installer. The enclosed (naive) patch makes sure grub-installer jumps to state 2 (hence ignores $default_bootdev) if grub-installer/bootdev is known. It has been suc

Re: Bug#738765: boot.img in daily image files exceed 10mb limit

2014-02-19 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 19 feb 14, 08:56:51, Shinn, Rob wrote: > On 02/19/2014 01:21 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: [snip] If you don't mind, please be so kind to remove me from the CC list, I'm only triaging bugs filed against unknown packages and can't help you further with this issue ;) Kind regards, Andrei --

Bug#739006: Switch to mkdosfs instead of libparted

2014-02-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:48:19AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On 2/19/2014 10:14 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> This *looks* sane enough to me, but I've not had a chance to test >> it directly yet. What testing have you done, please? > >None yet. I

Bug#739006: Switch to mkdosfs instead of libparted

2014-02-19 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/19/2014 10:14 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > This *looks* sane enough to me, but I've not had a chance to test > it directly yet. What testing have you done, please? None yet. I guess I could figure out how to get qemu to emulate an efi system. On

Bug#739006: Switch to mkdosfs instead of libparted

2014-02-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Phillip, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:49:56PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: >Package: partman-efi >Tags: patch > >The attached patch switches partman-efi to use mkdosfs instead of >libparted to format the efi system partition, in preparation for the >parted3 transition. This *looks* sane enough to

Bug#738765: boot.img in daily image files exceed 10mb limit

2014-02-19 Thread Shinn, Rob
On 02/19/2014 01:21 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Re: Bug#738765: boot.img in daily image files exceed 10mb limit This > happens because boot.img exceed a "magic" 10mb limit. > > BTW, do we know the precise value for this issue? It'd be good that > we'd simply add a test during build, to abort it